1
   

Prince Charles to marry his slag

 
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 03:59 pm
Lord Ellpus wrote:
Piffka, If you are going back that far, he would have to do the same in Scotland ala the "history according to Hollywood and Mel Gibson epic" Braveheart. (you know, blue face...shouts "HOLD" a lot)

Segment of film script :-

Mel:- "G'Day you English Pommie B**stards, hoots mon if you dinnae turn around and send your bonnie wee soldiers back to Pommieland Sport, me and me fellow mate Scotlanders will give you a good kicking"

English Commander:- " I'm sorry Sir, we'll go immediately in order to give you more time to be heroic in this film and demonstrate how beastly us English have been"

Mel:- "Well, hurry up you English fop, I have to finish this film quickly in order to bugger off back to my beach Condo...its too bloody cold and wet here, and the Midgies are making me itch"
It would be interresting to see Charles face blue.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 04:01 pm
Fergie is the spokesperson for Weight Watchers in the States--and very popular.
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 04:10 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Piff says "Steve -- If you can imagine each of the fifty states as a country (and you ought to -- we are so different), then the USA is not doing THAT badly."

Well of course you are right but then the 50 states didn't have long histories as independent countries.

What I was really getting at was that most Americans seem to have a problem with the concept of pooling or sharing sovereignty.

However, back to strange dancers from Seattle

http://www.mossyback.com/
Did somebody forget about the Native Amarican Indian's? If you don't know about them, they had their own individual tribes. Also, don't forget, that Alaska, LA, and Hawaii used to be individual countries at one time.
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 05:16 pm
Noddy24 wrote:
Fergie is the spokesperson for Weight Watchers in the States--and very popular.
I'm an American and I find Fergie annoying. I do wonder though if she is a spy for the Brittish. Maybe she knows where their WMD's are.
0 Replies
 
ConstitutionalGirl
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 05:19 pm
ConstitutionalGirl wrote:
Noddy24 wrote:
Fergie is the spokesperson for Weight Watchers in the States--and very popular.
I'm an American and I find Fergie annoying. I do wonder though if she is a spy for the Brittish. Maybe she knows where their WMD's are.
The WMD's could be hidden in Camillia's Wine Celler.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 05:22 pm
I think she did visit here, haven't heard of a permanent move. Probably too late now. The public is fickle and has an extremely short attention span. That, coupled with really lousy short-term memory, is what leads to the old question, "What have you done for me lately?"
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 09:35 pm
Fergie is popular here, though it has been awhile since she has been really big news.

Much has been made of the fact that she was a bartender in New York not too long before she became a royal, and Americans came to view her as partly one of ours. She has a "slightly naughty but nice" image. Her bomb-out as a royal is hardly held against her. Coinciding as it did with the Diana fiasco, the continuing revelations of the (former King) Duke of Windsor's friendly ties to Hitler, and the harboring of former traitor Anthony Blunt on the royal payroll, most Americans came to regard the royal family as Officially Messed Up In The Head.

Not getting along with that bunch is, if anything, a badge of honor.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Apr, 2005 11:11 pm
Shame she didn't get custody of her children- they were at the wedding, too, with Randy Andy, their dad.
He keeps out of the limelight; I only seem to see him at weddings and funerals. I wonder what he costs per annum?
But shame on me, I shouldn't talk like this. I suppose if I want a royal family (did I just say that?) then I cannot banish a future king's brother.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 01:24 pm
Quote:
Camilla takes place on Queen's balcony

Sat Jun 11, 2005


Link to related photo
Members of the Royal family (L-R) Prince William, Camilla Duchess of Cornwall, Prince Charles, Prince Edward, Queen Elizabeth and the Duke of Edinburgh watch the fly past on the balcony of Buckingham Palace in London following the Trooping the Colour ceremony marking the Queen's official birthday in London, June 11, 2005. Camilla, Prince Charles's new wife, appeared on Saturday for the first time on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, an iconic setting for royal appearances before the public. REUTERS/Kieran Doherty

Link to related photo
Prince Charles's new wife Camilla appeared for the first time on June 11, 2005, on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, an iconic setting for royal appearances before the public. Prince William (L) speaks with Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall (C) as Prince Charles (R) watches a fly past on the balcony of Buckingham Palace following the Trooping the Colour ceremony in London, June 11, 2005. REUTERS/Kieran Doherty



LONDON (Reuters) - Prince Charles's new wife Camilla appeared for the first time on Saturday on the balcony of Buckingham Palace, an iconic setting for royal appearances before the British public.

Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, was taking part in her first Trooping the Colour ceremony as a member of the royal family to mark Queen Elizabeth's official birthday.

During the procession Camilla rode in a carriage with her step-son Prince William.

In an annual ceremony dating back to the early 1700s, the queen inspected the red-coated troops of the Household Division on Horse Guards Parade in London's Whitehall district.

The queen later joined Camilla and other members of the royal family on the palace balcony to watch a Royal Air Force flypast.

Camilla, blamed by many for Charles's split with the late Princess Diana, was for many years relegated to the sidelines of royal engagements before her marriage in April to the heir to the throne.

Camilla's appearance on the balcony will have been a "hugely significant moment" for her, former BBC royal correspondent Jennie Bond told Reuters.

"To stand there will be a total affirmation that she is now accepted as the second most senior female royal in the land and must take her position as such," Bond said.
Source
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 02:18 pm
and your point is?
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 03:01 pm
I guess Walter figured this was a tiny step in the direction of Camilla being accepted as a full fledged member of the Royal Family. Before she was Charles' Embarrassing Mistress.

Maybe the Royal Family will try to promote her a little bit. I'm not biting my fingernails over this, mind, but bit by bit people who were once considered unacceptable do win acceptance.

I think she would have to make a nice speech or do a great job adopting a cause for people to change their opinion of her.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 03:14 pm
Camilla's Chas's wife. They were going to keep her off the balcony? Let her stand on the balcony, for crying out loud. Enough with the banishment already.

I think Camilla would be a real laugh in private. Her sister looks interesting, too.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 03:16 pm
She's got to have humor with a chap like Charles.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 03:21 pm
CJ

he has an enormous di1k aparantly
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 03:59 pm
Camilla's doing rather nicely. Has a couple of charities that she continues to do work with, has picked up a few more. Keeping her own house. Seems like a pretty standard grownup woman in a lot of ways.

Being attached to that family - well, if she wants to be around them, more power to her.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 04:04 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
CJ

he has an enormous di1k aparantly


Steve, admit it, your judging him by his nose only (or was it his ears?) Wink
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 04:31 pm
McTag wrote:
They were going to keep her off the balcony? Let her stand on the balcony, for crying out loud. Enough with the banishment already.


Actually, I see no evidence that anyone ever intended to keep her off the balcony.

But the fact that she was on the balcony is somehow considered by some as an attempt by the Royal Family to include her in the family picture, as it were.

Not that anyone was actually going to kick her off the balcony in the first place.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Jun, 2005 04:35 pm
McTag wrote:
I think Camilla would be a real laugh in private. Her sister looks interesting, too.


Maybe, but she's still part of the lousy deal the royal family and assorted hangers-on gave Diana.

So to hell with her.

But then, it's not my country, so you can do what you wish.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jun, 2005 03:39 am
It's her hat that intrigued me. Why wear something like that in 2005?Laughing
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jun, 2005 09:05 am
Msolga, for the same reason, one would consider a balcony
appearance important in 2005 Wink
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.24 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 01:50:00