Phoenix32890 wrote:mysteryman- I happen to agree with you almost all of your points. The problem is, that the political stance that you are espousing is NOT shared by all conservatives, especially the most vocal ones.
Quote:I believe we have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.
I believe in individual privacy.
In today's society, your two statements that I quoted from you are a contradiction in terms. If one has individual privacy, a citizen should not have to be concerned that religious groups will attempt to superimpose their values on him. Apparently, this is exactly what is happening on the conservative end of the political spectrum.
Those two statements seem to be the ones most people have a problem with,so I will explain them.
Everyone has the right to practice their own religion,without interference or harassment by the govt (providing their religion does not involve human sacrifice or child abuse). That is freedom OF religion.
IMHO,freedom FROM religion consists of many things.
Some of them are good things,but many people think that we cant have manger scenes in a public park,the 10 commandments in a public building,or any public display of religion,of any sort.
Those are what I mean about freedom FROM religion.
When people get offended because a school girl wears a necklace with a cross to school,when people get offended because a Muslim girl follows her religious beliefs and wears a headscarf to school,those people are guilty of wanting freedom FROM religion.
Individual privacy means just that.
You have the right to do whatever you want in your own home,again that does not include abusing kids or your spouse,or committing murder,without interference from me or anyone else.
That also means you have the right to turn away religious missionaries if you want.
That is what I mean by those statements,others might have different ideas.