There are many who condemn those bombings.
Although 25,000 dead at Dresden hardly compares to the deaths of more than 11 million people.
According to "historians" who have revised the amount of deaths in Dresden, they officially have counted 25,000 dead.
This is interesting.
The population in Dresden before the attacks was 600,000 inhabitants.
The city was completely destroyed by the bombing which came without warning. The Allies improvised a new kind of bomb that was a destroyer burning and spreading particles everywhere. These bombs turned down buildings like crazy.
But, historians -who knows who have paid them- say that from 600,000 people, with such a devastation, that only 25,000 people died and 35,000 were "missing".
They add that after a while, those 35,000 people who were "missing" they "appeared later on".
Well, lets play the game.
In order to be officially counted as "dead", the requirement is the dead body. So, from 600,000 people after the total destruction of Dresden, the number of dead bodies is 25,000.
I like it.
I will tell to those "historians" to perform the same way of counting with the number of dead Jews in WW2 that have been claimed as 6'000,000.
So, using the same official method of counting, we can say. "hell with that number of 6'000,000" dead Jews in WW2.
Yes, hell with that counting because such is not the official method, and that exaggerate number has been reached just as an "estimate".
Such amount given by you of 6'000,000 dead Jews is simply unacceptable.
You must count the bodies, and come back and give us the number of dead Jews bodies you found after WW2.
You must count the dead bodies -go from cemetery to cemetery in Europe- and give as the number of deaths in WW2, and you must count 11'000,000.
No other amount is acceptable... count the dead bodies and come back.
There is no need to replace the statues that are turned down by those fanatics who think that they are making a benefit to society by removing the representation of what was part of history in the US.
I think that these liberals love to much backing up illegal immigration, because they are becoming more and more Mexican alike each day.
They want to destroy the statues of great men who fought for their principles -whatever their principles were- and became heroes by war actions, and their input to make great this country.
Liberals want to replace those statues of former heroes by statues of female black singers, a fireman doing his duty, perhaps a statue of the fat gossip woman who lives across the street when walking her dog, etc.
They want one of "their own" represented in the statue.
And this is what Mexicans did since centuries ago. The statue of Francisco Pizarro is far away from downtown, but the cities are full of statues of former aborigine kings. This is because Mexicans hate "white people" in power, their leaders can be white but with black color of hair.
And, I can tell that even if liberals put the statue of Batman inside of a university or in front of a municipal building, the novelty will last no more than a few weeks.
After that, nobody will care about a piece of stone or copper in the middle of the park, and worst, such is indeed another waste of taxpayers money.
I think that if taxpayers money will be spent -again- in new statues, then before erecting a new one, the figure to be posted must be under vote, this is to say, "the People" must decide.
Not the Mayor, not the city councils, not the Congressmen, but "the People" in election day.