Finn Writes
Quote:One can only wonder why blatham finds it necessary to spew such bilious comments in your direction fox. If you were the simpleton blatham suggests, it's hard to understand why he might spend any time at all in countering your arguments.
Well I don't know either Finn. He says I'm dogmatic (among a few dozen other uncomplimentary adjectives). Interpretation as nearly as I can tell: I hold opinions he disagrees with, and because I don't change my opinions I am dogmatic. He of course does not apply the requirement to change opinions to anyone but conservatives and I seem to have a big bullseye painted on my forehead for this one. I just consider it an illustration of the thread's thesis.
Quote:Whatever you may or may not be, you are not a simpleton.
Well, thank you but yes sometimes I am. As a strongly extraverted intuitive type, given incomplete criteria, I tend to go with the version that seems to makes the most sense and then have to backtrack or amend as new information comes in. And I put way too much faith in people to be fair and reasonable sometimes.
Quote:Gosh, could it be that the masculine blatham is dismissive of the feminine foxfyre? Is gender bullying evidenced?
Who knows?
One of my more dogmatic stances is a conviction of the impropriety of judging undeclared motives of others.
Quote:Ad hominem attacks diminish all who launch them. I could be wrong, but my experience in this forum is that you always, despite provocation, remain civil and engaged in ideas rather than invective. I, for one, appreciate this.
Thank you. I try. I don't always make it. But I try.
Quote:PS: I have high regard for blatham.
I did too until I found him to be cruelly cutting even as he demonstrated the most grievous offenses of which he was accusing me. I post from liberal, conservative, and everything in between sources to support my views on A2K, and he posts only from clearly liberal sources, but according to him, I'm the one who is deficient in my sources.
Quote:He is a fuzzy headed liberal, but he strives for clarity, and his intellect is impressive. Like all of us, he is subject to error (tough for a Liberal to acknowledge, but so be it), but his occassional conceit casts a shadowed light upon him.
How can one strive for clarity when clearly expressing contempt for any other point of view? That I and other conservatives have posted unbiased data showing the disparity between liberal and conservative ideology among most university faculties and have backed those up with personal experience and opinion of others including educators is somehow sinister to Mr. Blatham. He has to protect the world from people like me whether he does it with clarity or not.
Quote:Blatham will cut me slack, but that's because he holds open the hope that he'll get into my pants some day.
:::::cough::::::
Blatham writes
Quote:Perhaps the three of us can move into a group hug if you use the simple device of considering me a liberal version of John Bolton.
I would just like to consider you as one of those rare liberals who reasons and thinks. However, one needs to reciprocate respect. I regretted very much when you decided to end our friendship.
Lash writes
Quote:Foxy, if this is already here in the preceding pages I haven't read, just let me know, and I'll delete it.
That piece or one very similar to it has been posted, but it can't be posted enough, Lash. Please don't delete it.
And now it's to the showers for me and off to teach my class whcih interestingly today will focus on the resistance to change during the English Reformation.