1
   

Powell,as expected,resigns- Rice successor

 
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 12:01 pm
PDiddie wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Anyone else find it telling that the one man who had any sense is departing the admin?


Ah yes, the last sane person in the administration...

http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/usa/colin-powell/capt.lon82607021755.indonesia_gala_powell_lon826.jpg


By this time it was old hat to him. Bush has him dress up and dance like that for the UN all the time.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 12:03 pm
Now if we could just get the crook Kofi out and Powell in at the UN, my day would be near perfect Smile
0 Replies
 
Thok
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 12:08 pm
JustWonders wrote:
Now if we could just get the crook Kofi out and Powell in at the UN, my day would be near perfect Smile


How do you mean, Powell as UN secretary general?

btw, I don't like Annan too. He is from Ghana, but help he his fellows and anywhere else? No.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 12:16 pm
Thok - I think Powell would make a great replacement for Annan. Not holding out much hope, but the thief Kofi must GO.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 12:17 pm
I'm looking forward to the Rice confirmation hearings. Oughta be good for some light entertainment.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 12:52 pm
JustWonders wrote:
Thok - I think Powell would make a great replacement for Annan. Not holding out much hope, but the thief Kofi must GO.


You have evidence of this man gaining personally from illegal transactions?
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:00 pm
We might if he'd stop trying to block the investigation.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:02 pm
JustWonders wrote:
We might if he'd stop trying to block the investigation.


would that be anything like Cheney attempting to block investigations into energy policy meetings?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:09 pm
Stole the words right out of my mouth, Bear...

How about our own gov't refusing to supply critical information about 9/11? There should be hordes of conservatives screaming for more information on that one, considering the level of attention that is being spent on oil-for-food...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:22 pm
AH lads, do you honestly expect an answer to those issues? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:24 pm
Quote:
THE OIL-FOR-FOOD INVESTIGATION

Senators Accuse U.N. Leader of Blocking Their Fraud Inquiry
By JUDITH MILLER

Published: November 10, 2004

Leaders of a United States Senate subcommittee investigating allegations of fraud in the oil-for-food program in Iraq have accused Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, of obstructing their inquiry.In a letter sent to Mr. Annan yesterday, the Republican chairman and ranking Democrat on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations charged that the secretary general and a panel he appointed to conduct an independent investigation into the charges of abuses appeared to be "affirmatively preventing" the Senate from getting documents from a former United Nations contractor that inspected goods bought by Iraq.

The senators also complained that Mr. Annan was blocking access to 55 internal audit reports of the program and other relevant documents and refusing to permit United Nations officials to be interviewed by the subcommittee's investigators

The United Nations-administered program, which ran from 1996 to 2003, allowed Iraq to sell oil to buy food and other essential supplies for Iraqis hurt by economic sanctions.

The senators said it had taken four months for Mr. Annan to reply to the subcommittee's requests, and when he finally did, he refused to cooperate with the Senate inquiry.

"We are concerned that the U.N.'s nondisclosure policy is being used as both a sword and a shield," the senators wrote, "sharing such 'internal records' when it favors the U.N., but then declining to do so when such disclosure could have negative implications.

"The blunt letter is signed by the subcommittee's chairman, Senator Norm Coleman, Republican of Minnesota, and Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan.

Edward Mortimer, director of communications in the secretary general's office, said United Nations officials would "carefully look into what is clearly a very awkward and troubling letter."

He said he would also consult with Paul A. Volcker, who heads the United Nations-appointed investigation panel. Mr. Mortimer emphasized that Mr. Annan had instructed all United Nations staff to cooperate with Mr. Volcker's panel, known as the Independent Inquiry Committee.

Neither Mr. Volcker nor members of his staff, who have had a tense relationship with several House and Senate committees investigating the program, could be reached for comment last night.

The subcommittee also announced yesterday that on Monday it would hold the first of several hearings into allegations of widespread corruption in the $64 billion program. Among the first witnesses scheduled is Charles A. Duelfer, the chief American adviser on Iraq's unconventional weapons programs. Mr. Duelfer, the head of the Iraq Survey Group, recently published a lengthy report on Iraqi weapons programs that documented Saddam Hussein's use of the program not to buy civilian supplies as intended, but to generate billions of dollars in illicit money, undermine sanctions and buy conventional arms.

In their letter to Mr. Annan, the senators cited the United Nations' refusal to permit Lloyd's Register, which the United Nations had hired to inspect Iraq's purchases, to provide documents to the Senate investigators.

In an Aug. 31 letter, the director of the United Nations' legal affairs office told Lloyd's that while Lloyd's should cooperate fully with Mr. Volcker's panel, "under no circumstances" was it authorized to provide documents to the subcommittee.

The letter also asks Mr. Annan to permit the Senate investigators to interview 11 senior United Nations officials, including Benon V. Sevan, who headed the program. Mr. Duelfer's report said Mr. Sevan might have received oil allocations from Saddam Hussein. Mr. Sevan has denied any impropriety.



Source
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:25 pm
See told ya!! Laughing
Thanks for proving my point JW
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:39 pm
JustWonders wrote:
We might if he'd stop trying to block the investigation.


So your charge that he profited illegally is without basis, even while Mobil, Chevron, and Phoenix Int and various individuals, including Americans, are in receipt of supoenas and while Annan is not. Do I have the facts right here, or is there something you haven't passed on to the rest of us?
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:57 pm
Will the Republicans remain on the right?

Yes, and they will continue to push the right further into extremism and will only be stopped by a third party, yet to be formed.

Condi Rice is a disaster, no matter angle she is viewed from.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 01:59 pm
plainoldme wrote:
Will the Republicans remain on the right?

Yes, and they will continue to push the right further into extremism and will only be stopped by a third party, yet to be formed.

Condi Rice is a disaster, no matter angle she is viewed from.


I think many of you are missing the fact that the current administration IS forming a very successful third party...the New Theocracy/Dominionist party....these are NOT republicans
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:09 pm
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/04.11.15.KeepsARollin-X.gif
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:14 pm
blatham wrote:
JustWonders wrote:
We might if he'd stop trying to block the investigation.


So your charge that he profited illegally is without basis, even while Mobil, Chevron, and Phoenix Int and various individuals, including Americans, are in receipt of supoenas and while Annan is not. Do I have the facts right here, or is there something you haven't passed on to the rest of us?


Blatham - try sticking to the subject at hand. Sure there's fraud to be found everywhere if one looks hard enough (I just discovered some interesting facts about unions and our recent election a few minutes ago).

If you want to believe that there's no proof that Saddam (and certain others) stole millions from the Oil for Food Scam while Annan and his corrupt UN bunch looked the other way, fine.

If nothing else, Annan is guilty by implication of the very fact that he's doing everything in his power to obstruct a valid investigation.

The hearings yesterday focused on Saddam. What's going to be really interesting is when those on Capitol Hill start naming names. And they will.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:19 pm
Nothing like a good 'ol witch hunt to get the republicans all interested.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:22 pm
Until you notice that a Democrat signed the letter as well.
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:45 pm
Who made these findings by the way?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/11/2025 at 02:42:42