I would recommend however that you actually go through and read the entire link I originally posted, as it seems to bring up some excellent points about how the original report was severely flawed.
CBS and NBC reporting on the content of the report itself tells us nothing. The 'alternative voting methodolgy project' page tells us nothing as well except an opinion of different ways it could be done based upon the CONCLUSIONS of the EM report, not a critical look at the report itself.
Thanks for the links, I still need to do some more studying on the one I posted before I can decide whether there is merit to it or not.
Here's a line from it, though:
Quote:"While we cannot measure the Response rate by actual Kerry and Bush voters, hypothetical response rates of 56% among Kerry voters and 50% among Bush voters overall would account for the entire Within Precinct Error that we observed in 2004."
This, apparently, is the basis for their statement in the Executive Summary(p.4), that states "It is difficult to pinpoint precisely the reasons, in general, that Kerry voters were more likely to participate in exit polls than Bush voters.
No data in the E/M report supports the hypothesis that Kerry voters were more likely than Bush voters to cooperate with pollsters, and, in fact, the data provided by E/M actually suggests the opposite might be true.
It seems there is some debate as to the veracity of the E&M report. I would highly suggest ya read the entire one I linked so you can edify me on how they in particular are wrong, that is if you like. If not, that's cool too.
Thanks again for the links
Cycloptichorn
edit: Forgot the best part:
Section D: The same polls more accurately predicted the Senate races
Interesting...