Anyway, sorry I directed so much of my anti-apathy and anti-anti-Bush rant your way
my aim was a little faulty but at least the bullet sailed straight enough. Do read that link. Good night.
You're bent on attacking PNAC, and that's fine (though I think you're wrong in a few ways about that too),
yeah, i am. when unelected, unappointed voices are a driving force behind national policy, it's a problem in my opinion.
That's how representative democracies work... and not all special interest groups are up to no good. :wink: I'll be curious to see your actual reasons are. The PNAC has a broad enough vision that I'm certain you can't disagree with all of it. Be sure and give them equal time with their slanderers, or... well, you know what you'll get is unreliable (at best).lil trouble accepting Cav's horribly untimely demise
our a2k cav ?
Couldn't resist slipping in for a couple quick answers:
DontTreadOnMe wrote:You're bent on attacking PNAC, and that's fine (though I think you're wrong in a few ways about that too),
yeah, i am. when unelected, unappointed voices are a driving force behind national policy, it's a problem in my opinion.
okay. i'll try to do a good job in my explanation, so i'll collect my thoughts before sharing. and yeah, you are right there is more than one side to any story. three sides as i like to say.
DontTreadOnMe wrote:Yes, that one.lil trouble accepting Cav's horribly untimely demise
our a2k cav ?
The Hospital. The Wake.
I read of the meetings between Bush and Chirac and Schroeder from a dozen different sources. The NYT told the most discouraging pessimistic tales of that and seemingly every other lead story there was. Do New Yorkers like being depressed or something? They made USA Today look like the American Spectator (think extreme-Fox). It wasn't so much that I disagreed with there take (I usually do), but that they seemingly edit out every inspirational thought, every potential positive in a subliminal kind of way with their choices of words. I imagine it's just reflective of the various writers' mindsets, but when read immediately before or after other paper's reporting of same events the negativity that stands out like a naked person in a crowd. I wonder if the suicide rates in New York are higher than other cities? If you're miserable, and you subscribe to the Times, do yourself a favor and try ANY other reputable source for your news for a week and see if your mood doesn't improve.
