Bush supporters' aftermath thread

Just zapped? Pre-emptively? Damn. Musta been one of the Republican moderators.

The lock confused me too. I've seen hundreds of threads worse than that one. Do they ever unlock them once they've been locked... and have purged what they didn't like I wonder?

Dunno. This one from way back remains locked...I didn't even get a chance to post a snarky reply ...LOL.

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=888775#888775

Now it's unlocked!!!

Magic

Maybe it was locked "accidentally"?

Actually, such usually happens with locked threads - they get unlocked later.

Thanks Walter.

Usually it happens if someone reports a post, the thread gets locked and goes to committee. It remains locked so no changes can be made until the issue is discussed. If it is jusdged to be "acceptable" the thread is unlocked and life goes on.

Sometimes I have noticed a purge of posts if things get nasty. Other times it remains locked.

Missing a post there aren't you, McG? Thanks for the further explanation.

By the way, you guys should check out this thread.
(Especially Tico) :wink:

Scratch that. That thread sucks!

I found the url to the SNL skit (a mock tourism ad for France lol) . Yikes. Here's the dialogue...

"France. Home to the world's greatest painters, chefs.. and anti-Semites. The French. Cowardly, yet opinionated. Arrogant, yet foul-smelling. Anti-Israel, Anti-American, and, of course, as always, Jew-hating. Paris. The city of whores. Dog feces on every corner. And effite men yelling anti-Semitic remarks at children. The real creme de la creme of world culture. With all that's going on in the world, isn't it about time we got back to hating the French?"

Please address any and all complaints to the fine folks at SNL...here's the url:

http://www.miquelon.org/images/snlfrance2003.mpg

Interesting that that website (miquelon.org) has a protest letter (to the producers of SNL) about French-bashing (containing the SNL transcript). Them Canajuns are "profoundly worried" LOL.

http://www.miquelon.org/editorials/15-2-2004-LorneMichaels.htm

Would love to see SNL's producers' reply...

psssst



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-1425022,00.html

Blatham, you really should post that piece in the "I want the U.S. to lose the war in Iraq" thread.

I have a feeling there are a few on that thread who will be more than happy to hear your "news".

Go ahead. Make their day

"if I didn't think my opinion was right then it wouldn't be my opinion, therefore, any other opinion must be wrong, thus, stupid"
Blatham is, therefore, stupid. (Blatham also hates america and is considering moving to New Mexico to be with other people who hate american so much they are also willing to move to New Mexico)Ok, I lied about Blatham moving to New Mexico.(but not about his being stupid)

Blatham stupid? Perish the thought. He's just...a bit gormless LOL.

lol is right but I reiterate Blatham MUST be stupid.(he's both literate and liberal)

A sad contradiction we see way too much of these days.

yeah really, wouldn't it be nice if we could all be just like Tom DeLay?

Careful... I'm studying fallacies again today. :wink:

Interesting that inferred "I'm not like Tom Delay; therefore I am intelligent". Perhaps we should explore a definition of intelligence.

Using Ican's current method of research, let's say:

1. S/he is literate and liberal, therefore s/he is intelligent.

2. S/he is literate and liberal, therefore s/he is stupid.

3. S/he is literate and conservative, therefore s/he is intelligent.

4. S/he is literate and conservative, therefore s/he is stupid.

I think any particular bias on this particular subject can be discerned by how comfortable or uncomfortable one is with each statement.