Magginkat wrote:
..
Why do you cheer when the man (I use that word loosely) occupying the oval office announces that he has broken the law and will continue to do so? Would you do the same if the last legally elected president, Bill Clinton was still in office? LMAO! Hell no.
HELL YES! We in fact did do the same thing for Clinton when he too like many of his predecessors wiretapped calls between our foreign enemies and people residing in the USA and between those residents and other residents in the USA. Since it was legal for Clinton to authorize such wiretapping, then it is also legal for Bush to authorize the same kind of wiretapping. Clinton did not break the law when he authorized such wiretapping. Bush did not break the law when he authorized such wiretapping.
[quote]The Constitution of the United States of America
Effective as of March 4, 1789
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
...
Article II
...
Section 2. The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several states, when called into the actual service of the United States
...
13. Joint Resolution: Passed
September 14, 2001. SJ 23 ES 107th CONGRESS JOINT RESOLUTION
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/terroristattack/joint-resolution_9-14.html
14. Public Law 107-243 107th Congress Joint Resolution
Oct. 16, 2002 (H.J. Res. 114) To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq
www.c-span.org/resources/pdf/hjres114.pdf
What is your evidence that you think refutes my evidence? [/color]
You guys are such hypocrites. For several years you screamed that lying matters. Now that your old boy has become known as the most hated, most prolific liar to every occupy a public office your whole outlook has changed.
Bunkum Slop! All that alleged hatred et cetera is based on lying propaganda
Hypocrites.[/quote]
Clinton pled guilty to perjury before a grandjury. When Clinton perjured himself, he broke the law. Bush has not ever testified before a grandjury.
Bush did not
lie about Saddam possessing ready-to-use WMD or abetting al-Qaeda's perpetration of 9/11. Bush believed that true until he learned it was not true well after the invasion of Iraq. My evidence to support that is the fact that Clinton while president said Saddam possessed ready-to-use WMD and he declared Saddam's regime a danger to Americans among others.
12. STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT,
October 31, 1998
H.R. 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998
www.library.cornell.edu/colldev/mideast/libera.htm
What is your evidence that you think refutes my evidence?
