0
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 03:41 pm
Like McG said, that's just too easy.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 03:41 pm
D'oh! That's 2 softballs in a single thread!
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 03:45 pm
McGentrix wrote:
D'oh! That's 2 softballs in a single thread!


In a single hour. Smile
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 03:56 pm
And Walter contributed to the entertainment with his unique comma placement in his last post. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 03:59 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
And Walter contributed to the entertainment with his unique comma placement in his last post. :wink:


The A2K weekend edition usually has a bigger entertainment supplement.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 04:03 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
And Walter contributed to the entertainment with his unique comma placement in his last post. :wink:


The A2K weekend edition usually has a bigger entertainment supplement.


Laughing
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 6 Jan, 2006 11:05 pm
blatham wrote:
fox

You do get that donations are not the problem, rather any quid pro quo legislative favors delivered in return...the first being the way things work, the second being criminal?


cicerone wrote:
Fox prolly doesn't understand what this investigation is all about. Ignorance is devine!


blatham- Being from Canada, you may not have grown up with Merrie Meolodies and Loonie Toons, but being from Canada, you probably did - in as much as they were cultural icons of the US.

In any case, one of my favorite Warner Bros cartoon involved a pair of dogs: One was a real tough nut, usually a bull dog, and occasionally wearing a bowler with a rakish tilt. Whether bulldog or other breed, his name was always "Spike." The other pooch was a small and generally non-plain mutt, whose name (if it ever was revealed) wasn't memorable. What was memorable was the way the small mutt would bounce around the strutting and self-confident Spike, with his tongue lagging and his eyes bulging, desperately trying to kiss up to his hero:

"You really kicked that cat's ass! Right Spike?"

"Boy that cat took a real beating. Right Spike?"

"That cat prolly doesn't understand what this investigation is all about. Right Spike?"

"Ignorance is devine, and that cat is deevine! Right Spike?"

At some point, Spike grunts "Shaadupp!" and smacks the little pooch in the kisser.

We're waiting Spike.
0 Replies
 
Mortkat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 01:20 am
Finn- I don't think that Blatham's early years in Canada set him back with regard to his understanding of US cartoons. Didn't they get the same ones we did. I am of the mind that Blatham's unfortunate lack of coherence may stem from the dreadful medical system in Canada which forces people to wait in interminable queues. A child who needs treatment for a skull fracture, for example, mauy have to wait until it is too late, I understand.

Give him some slack, Finn!!!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 05:26 am
Foxfyre wrote:
There is a vast difference between a lobbyist who may or may not be Republican lobbying Republicans and a person who is lobbying on behalf of the Republican party. The media gives the impression that the latter is the case. It isn't.


Jesus. Your ability to deny anything you aren't comfortable hearing or thinking about reaches levels I've never encountered before.

Jack Abramoff:

- Bush Pioneer
- College Republican National Committee (CRNC) National Chairman from 1981-85
- one of Tom DeLay's "closest and dearest friends"
- Director of the National Center for Policy Research
- financial support overwhelmingly to Republican politicians
- joined the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, whose website described him as "directly involved in the Republican party and political conservative movement leadership structures and is one of the leading fund raisers for the party and its congressional candidates."
link
- And then there is the identity of the people involved. For 25 years Abramoff has been a key figure in the conservative movement that led to the 1994 Republican Revolution, which once promised "to drain the swamp" in Washington, D.C. Abramoff is mentor and close friend to the prominent activist Grover Norquist, and to Ralph Reed, founder of the Christian Coalition, highly successful political operative, and self-advertised adviser to the Bush White House. Both Reed and Norquist, in fact, lead organizations that were recipients of the tribes' generosity, through Abramoff's intercession. (the Weekly Standard)

And a HELL of a lot more, not least being the K Street Project.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 05:35 am
As of yesterday, you all likely know already, DeLay is gone as a consequence of his own party finally getting the clue that someone so ethically impaired ain't good for either democracy or for electoral hopes in November, the guy having become about as attractive as an aardvark turd hanging on a dead christmas tree.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 05:36 am
Quote:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-01-06-hill-poll_x.htm
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 07:30 am
Reduce taxes to the very wealthy and let the poor kids get blown to **** because bucks are scarce. Every bloody day I cannot imagine what else these bastards will do to make me detest them more and they find a way.

Quote:
The NYT fronts an internal Pentagon report concluding that 80 percent of marines who died from upper-torso wounds in Iraq could have been saved by larger body armor. The Marine Corps has known this since last June, yet did not place an order for the armor until September.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 10:32 am


Of the 1,001 polled, 52% were Democrats and 40% Republican. How do you think the poll results would change if those numbers were reversed?

http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/client/act_dsp_pdf.cfm?name=mr060106-3topline.pdf&id=2928
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 10:36 am
blatham wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
There is a vast difference between a lobbyist who may or may not be Republican lobbying Republicans and a person who is lobbying on behalf of the Republican party. The media gives the impression that the latter is the case. It isn't.


Jesus. Your ability to deny anything you aren't comfortable hearing or thinking about reaches levels I've never encountered before.

Jack Abramoff:

- Bush Pioneer
- College Republican National Committee (CRNC) National Chairman from 1981-85
- one of Tom DeLay's "closest and dearest friends"
- Director of the National Center for Policy Research
- financial support overwhelmingly to Republican politicians
- joined the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, whose website described him as "directly involved in the Republican party and political conservative movement leadership structures and is one of the leading fund raisers for the party and its congressional candidates."
link
- And then there is the identity of the people involved. For 25 years Abramoff has been a key figure in the conservative movement that led to the 1994 Republican Revolution, which once promised "to drain the swamp" in Washington, D.C. Abramoff is mentor and close friend to the prominent activist Grover Norquist, and to Ralph Reed, founder of the Christian Coalition, highly successful political operative, and self-advertised adviser to the Bush White House. Both Reed and Norquist, in fact, lead organizations that were recipients of the tribes' generosity, through Abramoff's intercession. (the Weekly Standard)

And a HELL of a lot more, not least being the K Street Project.


And, considering that 40% of his efforts were devoted to Democrats in the last several years, your expounding relates to this scandal, how? And how is it honest to repeatedly refer to Republicans and say that 40% of the contributions going to Democrats is irrelevent? Take your time. I'll wait.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 10:43 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
blatham wrote:
fox

You do get that donations are not the problem, rather any quid pro quo legislative favors delivered in return...the first being the way things work, the second being criminal?


cicerone wrote:
Fox prolly doesn't understand what this investigation is all about. Ignorance is devine!


blatham- Being from Canada, you may not have grown up with Merrie Meolodies and Loonie Toons, but being from Canada, you probably did - in as much as they were cultural icons of the US.

In any case, one of my favorite Warner Bros cartoon involved a pair of dogs: One was a real tough nut, usually a bull dog, and occasionally wearing a bowler with a rakish tilt. Whether bulldog or other breed, his name was always "Spike." The other pooch was a small and generally non-plain mutt, whose name (if it ever was revealed) wasn't memorable. What was memorable was the way the small mutt would bounce around the strutting and self-confident Spike, with his tongue lagging and his eyes bulging, desperately trying to kiss up to his hero:

"You really kicked that cat's ass! Right Spike?"

"Boy that cat took a real beating. Right Spike?"

"That cat prolly doesn't understand what this investigation is all about. Right Spike?"

"Ignorance is devine, and that cat is deevine! Right Spike?"

At some point, Spike grunts "Shaadupp!" and smacks the little pooch in the kisser.

We're waiting Spike.


This is the best analogy I've seen yet of this phenomenon, Finn, but I wouldn't hold my breath for either Spike or the annoying little dog to 'get it'.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 10:49 am
That IS a good analogy!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 11:29 am
blatham, Isn't it interesting that righties tell cartoon jokes after they have knowledge that our marines were under-equipped and killed unnecessarily - continuing to make excuses for this incompetent administration that continues their rhetoric about "to protect the American people." They just want to save the big bucks for tax breaks for the rich, and phuck the marines.

That kind of attitude is about the most outrageous, and they don't even understand anything.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 11:47 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
blatham, Isn't it interesting that righties tell cartoon jokes after they have knowledge that our marines were under-equipped and killed unnecessarily - continuing to make excuses for this incompetent administration that continues their rhetoric about "to protect the American people." They just want to save the big bucks for tax breaks for the rich, and phuck the marines.

That kind of attitude is about the most outrageous, and they don't even understand anything.


Perfect timing - thanks.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 01:11 pm
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
blatham, Isn't it interesting that righties tell cartoon jokes after they have knowledge that our marines were under-equipped and killed unnecessarily - continuing to make excuses for this incompetent administration that continues their rhetoric about "to protect the American people." They just want to save the big bucks for tax breaks for the rich, and phuck the marines.

That kind of attitude is about the most outrageous, and they don't even understand anything.


Perfect timing - thanks.


I would never be so crass as to say that I told you so. Smile
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jan, 2006 01:15 pm
Even De:Lay (appropriate) is beginning to understand the seriousness of the charges made against him. His egomania is beginning to realize the reality of what's happening in the real world.

DeLay to relinquish Congress post
Embattled Republican politician Tom DeLay will not attempt to reclaim his post as majority leader of the US House of Representatives, officials say.
Mr DeLay was forced to step aside temporarily after he was indicted in Texas on a campaign finance case.

The politician is accused of laundering corporate contributions for use in Republican campaigns in the state.

He has maintained his innocence and had until now said he intended to resume his leadership post once cleared.

His decision to quit clears the way for Republicans to choose a new leader to represent them in the House of Representatives.

'Always ethical'

Mr DeLay, a close ally of President George W Bush, was one of the most powerful politicians in Washington before his indictment in September.

In a letter to Republicans he said he "had always acted in an ethical manner". * We shall see very soon.

But he could not "allow our adversaries to divide and distract our attention," he wrote, quoted by the Associated Press new agency.

Mr DeLay's spokesman said the politician would retain his seat in the House, Reuters news agency reported.

Mr DeLay and two others are accused of laundering $190,000 (£109,000) in corporate donations for distribution to Republican candidates to the Texas Legislature in the 2002 state campaign.

Texas state law forbids the use of corporate money for political campaigns.



Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/4591250.stm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 07:20:06