0
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread

 
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 09:53 am
Thomas wrote:
Interesting -- British newspapers, right and left alike, consider it news that the American president sometimes goes to the bathroom. My British friends must be worse informed than I thought.


They consider it news when Harry picks his nose.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 09:57 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Interesting -- British newspapers, right and left alike, consider it news that the American president sometimes goes to the bathroom. My British friends must be worse informed than I thought.


They consider it news when Harry picks his nose.


Now THAT was funny. Because it is true.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:00 am
squinney wrote:
What I find interesting is that in his fifth year as President he doesn't know protocol because he "isn't used to attending UN meetings. "


Nonsense!

Perhaps you could let us all know - based on your vast experience - just what is the "protocol" for going to the john at the UN.

All this illustrates the desperation and malice of the close-minded compulsive Bush detractors on this thread.

There are three significant parts to this BS. First the utterly unremarkable incident itself; second the fact that the media agency chose to make it news; and third the touting of it as something meaningful by practicioners of partisan nonsense on this thread.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:05 am
Perhaps it's just the touting of it due to lack of having earned respect.

Perhaps it is the touting of it cause Bush / his administration? Republicans find it okay to stick their noses in our bedrooms, but think bathroom talk is out of line.

Rolling Eyes

Perhaps it's just a silly jab, one of those cases where the door was left wide open for comment and silliness and SOME just have no sense of humor.

I don't really think anyone is taking it seriously. Lighten up.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:10 am
We don't really espect him to know UN protocol after 5 years as President of the strongest, most powerful, freedom lovingest, vacationingest country in the world.

It's hard work.

Really hard work.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:24 am
Coming soon to a Presidential speech near you...

Quote:
Premier Silvio Berlusconi on Friday declared Italy's mission in Iraq ''an absolute and total'' success, and said Italy would continue to reduce its military presence there.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:32 am
Foxfyre and Timberlandko...

timberlandko wrote:
Deja vu all over again ...

Quote:
Bush 'Potty Note' was a fake

(JND) - Reuters News has acknowledged the Bush 'Potty Note' photo spread after his United Nations speech was enhanced using Adobe photoshop ...

When weathering against just how unreliable the mainstream media are, it may be worth to think twice before relying on some blog for the proof on that.

"Juice News Daily", from which Timber took that quote, by now has had to retract its claim about the photo being a fake. Digitally enhanced (to make the writing come out more clearly), yes, but the text was there true enough.
And as Walter's latest link shows, the Prez did indeed get up to go to the toilet immediately after.

Now I, for sure, dont care one WHIT about a President's need to go to the toilet, and I would rather have been spared the whole report.

But one's got to find great irony in Timber's unqualified post from a blog item and Foxfyre's subsequent, immediate tirades about the "non-reporters posing as journalists" who "neither research nor even gather their own information", "every single one of" whom "should own up to their own deceptive techniques".

This whole tirade, after all, was based on a copy/paste of a single blog item from Juice News Daily, which duly turned out to be erroneous.

So in short, we have Foxfyre dramatically lamenting "the tragic part" in where "erroneous information", written by "non-reporters posing as journalists" who "neither research nor even gather their own information" is repeated and "then copied and pasted all over the internet", where it immediately "convinces those who do not have a healthy skepticism about it all" ...

... when she based that very lament on an erroneous piece of information, which was copied/pasted over the internet, where it immediately convinced former journalist Fox, who sure didn't bother to "research" it herself. So much for "healthy skepticism"! Razz

Hard to see, the beam in one's own eye... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:37 am
Glad it wasn't me, who wrote that :wink:

Thanks, nimh.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:43 am
And, in the same light as nimh's post:

georgeob1 wrote:
kelticwizard wrote:
[
What bunk. FEMA does not require permission from the governor. It is Federally funded,and needs no permission from any state government to do what Congress funded it to do-save lives, commence rescue operations, and so much more.

Because Governor Blanco did not agree for the Federal government to take over the entire city of New Orleans before the storm hit, the Bush supporters are maintaining that the Feds could only sit idly by and watch it happen.

Another variation on this theme is that FEMA "are not first responders".

This is completely false.


This statement is incorrect in virtually every particular. The law is very clear on FEMA's role and the limits of the powers of the Federal government in local matters. It is useful to accompany one's indignation with some factual knowledge of the subject at hand.


In answer, I give you this:

Quote:
Chertoff delayed federal response, memo shows

By Jonathan S. Landay, Alison Young and Shannon McCaffrey

Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - The federal official with the power to mobilize a massive federal response to Hurricane Katrina was Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, not the former FEMA chief who was relieved of his duties and resigned earlier this week, federal documents reviewed by Knight Ridder show.


Even before the storm struck the Gulf Coast, Chertoff could have ordered federal agencies into action without any request from state or local officials. Federal Emergency Management Agency chief Michael Brown had only limited authority to do so until about 36 hours after the storm hit, when Chertoff designated him as the "principal federal official" in charge of the storm.


As thousands of hurricane victims went without food, water and shelter in the days after Katrina's early morning Aug. 29 landfall, critics assailed Brown for being responsible for delays that might have cost hundreds of lives.

But Chertoff - not Brown - was in charge of managing the national response to a catastrophic disaster, according to the National Response Plan, the federal government's blueprint for how agencies will handle major natural disasters or terrorist incidents. An order issued by President Bush in 2003 also assigned that responsibility to the homeland security director.


But according to a memo obtained by Knight Ridder, Chertoff didn't shift that power to Brown until late afternoon or evening on Aug. 30, about 36 hours after Katrina hit Louisiana and Mississippi. That same memo suggests that Chertoff may have been confused about his lead role in disaster response and that of his department.

"As you know, the President has established the `White House Task Force on Hurricane Katrina Response.' He will meet with us tomorrow to launch this effort. The Department of Homeland Security, along with other Departments, will be part of the task force and will assist the Administration with its response to Hurricane Katrina," Chertoff said in the memo to the secretaries of defense, health and human services and other key federal agencies.


On the day that Chertoff wrote the memo, Bush was in San Diego presiding over a ceremony marking the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II.


Chertoff's Aug. 30 memo for the first time declared Katrina an "Incident of National Significance," a key designation that triggers swift federal coordination. The following afternoon, Bush met with his Cabinet, then appeared before TV cameras in the White House Rose Garden to announce the government's planned action.


That same day, Aug. 31, the Department of Defense, whose troops and equipment are crucial in such large disasters, activated its Task Force Katrina. But active-duty troops didn't begin to arrive in large numbers along the Gulf Coast until Saturday.....


From Knight Ridder
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:45 am
Now, can we put the whole "FEMA / Feds have to have permission from the governor" thing to rest?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:47 am
nimh wrote:
This whole tirade, after all, was based on a copy/paste of a single blog item from Juice News Daily, which duly turned out to be erroneous.

So in short, we have Foxfyre dramatically lamenting "the tragic part" in where "erroneous information", written by "non-reporters posing as journalists" who "neither research nor even gather their own information" is repeated and "then copied and pasted all over the internet", where it immediately "convinces those who do not have a healthy skepticism about it all" ...

... when she based that very lament on an erroneous piece of information, which was copied/pasted over the internet, where it immediately convinced former journalist Fox, who sure didn't bother to "research" it herself. So much for "healthy skepticism"! Razz

Hard to see, the beam in one's own eye... :wink:


So you're saying Foxy's advice is sound.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:49 am
Yep - pity she never applies it herself. Makes it seem so ... meaningless, somehow. Dare I say even: a mere stick to use against the other side, without, apparently, any autonomous significance to the user herself.

But yes, definitely sound advice! I would almost say: read it before posting anything you write ... and remember what happened.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:50 am
What I like especially about this, well, "case study" might be a big word here, is the pars pro toto metaphor it constitutes for the whole issue surrounding purported media bias. Its the history of it in a nutshell.

"You can't trust the reputed, mainstream media, because the journalists are biased -- so we're gonna rely on rabble-rousing blogs and talk radio from now on instead!"

Makes so much sense ... ;-)
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 10:55 am
squinney wrote:
Now, can we put the whole "FEMA / Feds have to have permission from the governor" thing to rest?


Actually no. The Feds can and certainly could do things like preposition supplies and materials at federal facilities (or even leased ones) anywhere without permission or even coordination with local authorities. However the authority for the preparation, initiation, and execution of disaster and evacuation planns & response is entirely and exclusively in the hands of state and local officials.

We had some relatively minor problems in the first area - partly a Federal responsibility; while we had very major problems in the second area - problems that were the principal cause factors (apart from the natural disaster itself) for what followed.

The selective focus on the first aspect of this matter by folks who also deny the seconfd and far more significant factor, is a clear indicator of their political bias and motivation.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 11:03 am
Thomas wrote:
Interesting -- British newspapers, right and left alike, consider it news that the American president sometimes goes to the bathroom. My British friends must be worse informed than I thought.


Disingenuous? The story is, the most powerful man in the world felt he had to ask an aide if he could go to the toilet, yes?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 11:04 am
"...is a clear indicator of their poltical bias and motivation..." george, You are funny!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 11:05 am
McTag wrote:

Disingenuous? The story is, the most powerful man in the world felt he had to ask an aide if he could go to the toilet, yes?


Take this in relation to how many he asked when going to war ...
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 11:06 am
McTag wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Interesting -- British newspapers, right and left alike, consider it news that the American president sometimes goes to the bathroom. My British friends must be worse informed than I thought.


Disingenuous? The story is, the most powerful man in the world felt he had to ask an aide if he could go to the toilet, yes?


You are defending the newsworthiness of a false story.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 11:08 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:


You are defending the newsworthiness of a false story.


You have more recent information than online?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2005 11:09 am
georgeob1 wrote:
However the authority for the preparation, initiation, and execution of disaster and evacuation planns & response is entirely and exclusively in the hands of state and local officials.

Is that even in the least true?

As soon as a disaster is declared an Incident of National Significance, the coordination of management operations shifts to the Department of Homeland Security.

The Department's head, Chertoff declared it such an incident on 30 August.

As FreeDuck has laid out in painstaking detail HERE, Chertoff had both the authority and the information to do so three days earlier already, when Governor Blanco wrote her State of Emergency letter to President Bush.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/23/2025 at 04:33:40