Foxfyre wrote:
The President can request such authority from the governor. President Bush did that in advance of the hurricane and declared a national emergency that would allow the use of federal troops. He was turned down.
That's not true. It was several days after the hurricane hit that the president asked the governor to cede her authority over Louisiana National Guard. Yes, he was turned down, but this did not happen before the hurricane hit.
Quote: The President requested the governor take action that the Federal government would have taken; ie mandatory evacuation in advance of the storm. She did not.
They had already decided to do the mandatory evacuation when he requested it, and they did do it. They might could have done it sooner, but that sounds like shoulda, woulda, coulda to me.
Quote: Prior to the levee breaking, FEMA through its associated agencies had trucks in place to deliver food and water to the Superdome. They were turned away on pretext they did not want to attract more people to that shelter.
No, that was Red Cross and again, several days after the storm. I don't know if I agree with the reasoning behind the decision or not, but if I were in charge and already had a situation that was out of my control, I might have made the same error in judgment.
Quote:Note that even though the devastation was as severe in Mississippi and Alabama, you don't hear the same criticisms and complaints that is coming from Louisiana.
Actually, there were quite a few complaints coming out of Biloxi, they are just harder to find because the mass devastation in NO was a headline grabber.
Quote:Why? Because the governors there did their jobs and worked with instead of against FEMA. They didn't expect FEMA to take the point and they didn't expect FEMA to do it all.
I keep hearing this. If you are aware of something that the governors of Missip and Bama did that the governor of Louisiana did not, please present it. I've not seen it. Nobody expects FEMA to do it all, but the declaration of emergency clearly stated that they expected the storm would overwhelm their resources and their ability to respond. If you read the National Response Plan from DHS, that is precisely when the federal government is supposed to take control of the relief effort. This plan should have gone into effect before the storm hit but it didn't.
Quote:Did the bureaucracy get in the way of efficiency and effectiveness. Absolutely and those things should be looked at an should be corrected.
But the most criticism is from a flooded city that should have been evacuated and wasn't.
Agree with the first part. As for the second part, I wonder how well my town would react to a disaster a fraction of that size. They just don't have the resources. NO is a city of 1/2 a million residents and who knows how many tourists. I agree that a mandatory evacuation should have been called earlier, but that is the greatest of all second guessing. Yes, it should have been completely evacuated, but after the storm, where was the cavalry?