@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:David, you are way off target.
I need more practice.
Maybe I 'll go to the gunnery range tomorrow.
glitterbag wrote:This is about things that make people smile, and talking about
blowing holes in people usually is upsetting. Even if justified, normal people
are haunted by the idea that they (all by themselves) played God.
I raised the point of defending
from packs of
un-friendly dogs.
glitterbag wrote:It's always been crystal clear that you think guns are the answer to every question.
Well, no. I dont see how guns can help us to reconcile Quantum Mechanics with extant Relativity Theory.
When I was 13, the girl of my dreams gave me what I deemed the rong answer
when I asked her out, despite my guns. Thay did not help.
glitterbag wrote:There are plenty of topics where your fascination with guns would be welcome.
That 's good to know.
glitterbag wrote: It's rude to hijack a happy thread and insist that your issues be addressed.
Not every thread is a debate. I would smile if you would show
respect to the members who do not want to discuss weapons 24/7.
Please take a moment to consider my request.
OK, but I
woud like to get commentary on my discrimination concept
from Andy or anyone, either here or elsewhere.
I think he is coming back. ( I hope, anyway ); i.e., that 'd be only about 1 or 2 posts.
Possibly, he will adamantly
refuse to comment; we 'll see.
David