@Leadfoot,
not really ,Im just calling out the obvious.. Youre limited powers of analyses and considering deep time ignores the evidence we have that life began very simply.
For many pro karyotes (from our view of them as they are extant ,now)
They have no DNA or iRNA
no mRNA introns
no mRNA to splice and cap
No nucleii nor complex organelles (like free living pre mitochondrial cells)
complex esters and fatty acids as cell walls (eukraryotes contain tranfer and complex elements)
contain but one enzyme for the mRNA polymerase to
act on but one kind of metabolic pathway (noATP/ADP pathways)
no methanogenesis metabolism (were they only plants???)
Now were we to go back several 10^9 years, would we find simpler and exchange based chemical structures (No purines and pyrimidines as we see in the Greenland or west Australian prokaryotickaryotic "fossil organelles"
Worry about your bar codes, meanwhile science has moved WAAAAY beyond your simple musings. Its not my field but I know Im waay closer to the facts than are you. Im not demeaning your intelligence like some other folks here would do. Im demeaning your IGNORANCE cause you have the ability to take up the subjct you just seem to refuse to even consider other nascent life options an the evidence that support them .
You have made fun of the fossil record. That too is an acquired skill. I suggest that , starting with the whale, you carefully read what the role of fossil species variability shows us and the actual heritability among the breadth of these fossils a they appear in stratigraphic time. Its a matter a induced variability as a sense of
1 expanding populations and end member changes
2 adaptability to environmental (geologic) changes
AND, all these change can occur without PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM, saltation, o or even cataclysms. We can see the global warming of today impress surface area changes in many marine animal species (just like it did for Pleistocene elephant and mastodons on land)