@blatham,
blatham wrote:
Money money money money money money money
Quote:State Department drops human rights as condition for fighter jet sale to Bahrain
The Obama administration had required as a precondition that Bahrain improve its human rights record, but the Trump administration dropped that requirement in a notification to Congress.
Possibly Trump is trying to have a "reset" in our relations with Bahrain.
Like most Moslem countries in the Middle East, Bahrain is highly intolerant of Christians and other non-Moslems, and, like the others, it's Moslem population is composed of Shias and Sunnis who are equally intolerant of each other. In the case of Bahrain, there is a Sunni ruler and elite that rules a largely Shia population. Across the Gulf, Iran is ruled by a Shia theocracy and is working hard to create discord in the Shia populations of Bahrain, the Emirates and Saudi Arabia.
"Human rights records" depend a lot on who is making the judgment. The UN Human Rights Commission finds no fault with either North Korea or these Moslem Countries, despite the avowed religious intolerance and the episodic cases of slavery that arise in some of them. Our former president Obama also ignored all this in his apology tour to the Middle east that was one of his early major acts as President. Obama somehow imagined that he spoke for Western Civilization, as he apologized to all, starting at an eminent university in Cairo. for the past ravages of mostly European colonial powers.
We have an important Naval base in Bahrain, and have used it and our relations with other Moslem nations to contain the revolutionary government of Iran; serve our other self-interests; and sustain the political stability of the region.
Blatham here plucks a detail out of the air to make an essentially fallacious point, mocking the actions of a neighboring government and our Christian traditions as he does so, oblivious of the political realities involved, and himself offering no alternative of any kind.
Meanwhile his Canadian government oversees the sale of it's uranium mining assets to Russia; piously supports international agreements on "climate change" ( all while itself having a much higher per capita rate of carbon emissions than any country in the Western Hemisphere); and as it earns most of its trade surplus through the export of tar sands petroleum - the only significant fuel in the world that is actually much dirtier than coal.
It often appears to me that Blatham should turn his zeal for reform closer to home. It is a bit strange that. with so much in Canada that should engage his professed concerns, he instead obsesses in the internal affairs of a neighboring country. Perhaps he finds Canada a bit boring.