192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 11:24 am
@revelette1,
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/5/video-puts-muslim-bakeries-florists-in-gay-rights-/

I wonder why no one has targeted any Muslim bakers for the same reasons they targeted Christian bakers.
Debra Law
 
  6  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 11:27 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

can one really rant AND rave? doesnt one rant if one raves???

We must be precise as well as concise
Economy in word usage is admired if its correct.


Wasn't Trump raving about himself and his "unquestionable" success and ranting about everyone and everything else?

Here's one of his recent "successes": Signing a bill eliminating a "job killing" regulation that blocked coal mining debris from being dumped into nearby streams.

0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 11:33 am
@Olivier5,
I think Blatham has most of those who don't agree with him on ignore. He doesn't seem to respond to anyone but those who enter the echo chamber.
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 11:36 am
@Walter Hinteler,
The DNC is not a govt agency, they are a private group, so no way for treason to apply.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
giujohn
 
  -3  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 11:52 am
@camlok,
camlok wrote:

I don't argue with Farmerman either. I simply discuss the issues, the ones that have been long hidden from everyone. Can you think of any good reason that things should be hidden by governments from their citizens?

See,

https://able2know.org/topic/369218-2

The discussion starts about six posts down.


I can think of lots of information the public should not have access to.
giujohn
 
  -3  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:01 pm
@camlok,
camlok wrote:

The entire population of the US, or at least a good portion of it has "done been played".

You are aware that the press is protected in its job by the US constitution. You are familiar with that document, aren't you?


The Press certainly has the protection under the Constitution too freely report as they see fit. Hence the term yellow journalism. If I were president I wouldn't allow any reporters access to press briefings who demonstrate a proclivity for lies and fake news, political opinion when they should be only reporting the facts instead of left-wing political agendas. And if they have questions they can submit those questions by email and if as president I found them unworthy of response they wouldn't get any. That's not restricting their right to report, they are still free to do so. It's time somebody took a stand against a clearly biased and slanted mainstream media. Restricting or violating their constitutional right would be sending in troops to confiscate their printing press or there broadcast station.
camlok
 
  0  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:03 pm
@giujohn,
I can assure you that none of the information discussed there is in any way " lots of information the public should not have access to".

Have a look, it's a real eye opener.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:04 pm
@giujohn,
If I were president I wouldn't allow any reporters access to press briefings who demonstrate a proclivity for lies and fake news,
----------

That should make Trump and those reporters kindred spirits.
ossobucotemp
 
  5  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:09 pm
@camlok,
Huffington Post
White House Considering Mobilizing National Guard To Round Up Unauthorized Immigrants: Report
Huffington Post - ‎1 hour ago‎

President Donald Trump's administration is considering mobilizing as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, according to a draft copy of an order obtained by The Associated Press.


Good grief............
giujohn
 
  -3  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:13 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

what scares me most about der Herr, is his attempts at undermining every basis of trust that we Americans are used to. Qe are falling for the Joe Goebels crap that asserted

"If you repeat a lie often enough and with enough passion, it soon becomes a FACT"

Trump hqs got that from the Reich cookbook's chief chef.


So I guess that make the MSM a bunch of jack-booted storm troopers.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:16 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
Even I don't argue with farmerman on this type of subject.


I usually look out the window searching for flying pigs whenever that happens.


Don't get a big head...You are wrong enough on other topics...
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  1  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:17 pm
@ossobucotemp,
Even gooder grief!

Shades of Der Führer.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:20 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
. At some point they will have to ask themselves exactly how much damage to traditional politics and government they are willing to accept



And therein lies the problem.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:22 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

for example, if your special, can you be very special??

Why not...You're very redundant.
farmerman
 
  2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:24 pm
@giujohn,
must be the pizza pie
giujohn
 
  -2  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:28 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

must be the pizza pie


That's not a slur of my Italian heritage is it? While I am a member of the Wop-a-ho tribe, only I and other Wops can slur it.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  5  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 12:38 pm
blatham, as quoted and partially bolded by giujohn:
Quote:
At some point they will have to ask themselves exactly how much damage to traditional politics and government they are willing to accept


Quote giujohn:
Quote:
And therein lies the problem.


So what's so bad about traditional politics? All I see since the beginning of the 20th Century is waves and waves of immigrants who come to America, most of them with no papers except their birth certificate, and in a couple of generations they are middle class people and fully accepted into society. Traditional politics was a big part of that.

Traditional politics also stopped the relegation of black people to second class status. The guy behind Trump's attacks on Traditional Politics is Steve Bannon, who ran a pro-Russian website. I'll take American Traditional Politics over Russian politics any day of the week.

Here is a perfect example of Russian politics-how they handle dissenters and demonstrators:



Russian politics? No thank you.



McGentrix
 
  -1  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 01:06 pm
@Blickers,
Unlike how those Americans handle them?



(Source chosen on purpose)
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -4  
Fri 17 Feb, 2017 01:07 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

I think Blatham has most of those who don't agree with him on ignore. He doesn't seem to respond to anyone but those who enter the echo chamber.


Yes, he does so to keep his admirers in the know. This is his personal blog now and he only wants to read the positive comments.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 11/01/2024 at 10:39:52