@Baldimo,
Quote:You sound pretty sure about this statement?
Admittedly it's a guess based on the relative populations of conservative Christians and Muslims in the USA.
Quote:You must also think cows still walk the streets of Denver...
Poked along by Massai herdsmen...I was really thinking about the hinterlands, not metropolitan areas — I realize that there are big demographic changes going on and had originally put "Idaho" but changed it to Colorado because that was the scene of the court battle cited in the article.
Quote: It reeks of targeting.
Some instances might have been but factual information is needed. I'm not sure it matters, legally.
Quote:
There shouldn't be a law in the first place, it's stupid to make people do things against their beliefs.
It's even stupider to allow people to claim they are exempt from civil authority because of their religious beliefs. Where does it end? It's against my beliefs to vaccinate my child. It's against my beliefs to pay taxes. It's against my beliefs to register my car. It's against my beliefs to sell cosmetic products to unmarried women.
Religious liberty guarantees freedom to worship any god and belong to any church but that's a far cry from just allowing any sort of behavior outside a religious context based on something as subjective as one's spiritual beliefs. Part of living in a pluralistic society is knowing where the boundaries between the public, private, and personal spheres are and not trying to force society at large to conform to the your own views. There are plenty of religious communities that recognize this and make the effort to separate themselves from the society at large to avoid this kind of conflict.