192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 08:14 pm
@goldberg,
Quote:
Wait, are you trying to insult Indian Americans?
Still trying to clean up your poopity mess eh?

You seem to write with skill so Im not gonna play your games. I take it youre educated enough to "get it".
goldberg
 
  0  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 08:25 pm
@farmerman,
Take care. I had better go into hiding just like Biden.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 08:34 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
BLM is as nice a "REMINDER" to whites that blacks seek the same inclusiveness that the US Constitution exclaims and the Gettysburg Address reminds us.

BLM are Communists. Black people are not the problem. White liberals are.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  3  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 08:37 pm
Saying "all lives matter" to a BLM motivator, is like standing up at a birthday party and screaming "I have a birthday too". It may be technically correct, but misses the point entirely.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  6  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 08:50 pm
When someone just has to respond to the statement “Black Lives Matter” with “All Lives Matter”, they are missing the point.


Black Lives Matter is a statement born of thousands of injustices over time that have combined in their weight to effectively invalidate black lives. Black lives matter is a desperate attempt to remind this country of something that was and is in danger of being erased by unjust convictions, unjust shootings, unjust strangulations and lynchings and by all the injustice that says “Wait, now is not the time to protest”, or “Don’t protest like that” .

The people who are compelled to answer “all lives matter” are missing the point like if some homeowners - seeing their neighbor’s house burning down and the firemen rushing frantically to save it - go to the firemen and proudly exclaim, “Our houses matter, too!”

Below viewing threshold (view)
farmerman
 
  5  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 09:02 pm
@goldberg,
Blacks were implicitly identified as proprty in the original body of the Constitution. When the Reconstruction Amendmennts were all ratified, they were almost immediately weakened by state legislatures and fed courts. Black Slaves became black victims who could easily be picked out and targeted for unfair state llaws and even atrocities and all sorts of unique discriminatory economic laws focused on blacks alone.
Of course other discrmination was taking place but none were uniquely identified within the US Constitution by explicit and implicit wording.


BLM , had it merely added the word "too' at the end of the phrase would you get it??

We are 155 years after the Civil War and what it ultimately grew to stand for and we are STILL not a land where all PEOPLE are created equal. As long as the black citizens of this country dont have the same full opportunities as other races , mostly(but not exclusively) whites, we are missing the point entirely.
Use of "All Lives Matter", nope, were not ready for that phrase at all. I think as a nation, we have to earn it with a lot more hard work.

McGentrix
 
  -2  
Tue 28 Jul, 2020 10:23 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

When someone just has to respond to the statement “Black Lives Matter” with “All Lives Matter”, they are missing the point.

Black Lives Matter is a statement born of thousands of injustices over time that have combined in their weight to effectively invalidate black lives. Black lives matter is a desperate attempt to remind this country of something that was and is in danger of being erased by unjust convictions, unjust shootings, unjust strangulation's and lynchings and by all the injustice that says “Wait, now is not the time to protest”, or “Don’t protest like that” .

The people who are compelled to answer “all lives matter” are missing the point.


Have we agreed on something before? I'm not sure. But we got this at least.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 12:13 am
https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/cb072820dAPR20200728124519.jpg
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 12:37 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:
Have we agreed on something before? I'm not sure. But we got this at least.

How is it an injustice for white people to try to defend themselves when a black person tries to rape and/or murder them?
BillRM
 
  3  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 12:56 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

McGentrix wrote:
Have we agreed on something before? I'm not sure. But we got this at least.

How is it an injustice for white people to try to defend themselves when a black person tries to rape and/or murder them?


No but it is injustice when innocent blacks men are going about their law abiding business an still get murder by polices or others.
Below viewing threshold (view)
BillRM
 
  3  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 01:40 am
@oralloy,
An who said anything about self defend?

footnote the 50 years old white women, the navel vet, or reporters and even the naked woman is not and never was a threat to the police or even Trump brown shirts.
Below viewing threshold (view)
BillRM
 
  3  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 02:47 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

It is justified self defense that you are wrongly referring to as casual murder. Or at least, that's what you are calling it when it's a white person who is justifiably defending themselves.


Please point to any posting of mine that question the right of self defense however it was not self defense when the police beat a middle age naval vet, or used gas on middle age white women, or pepper balls on a naked white woman.

More important police cutting off the air supply for 8 minutes of a handcuff man is not self defense.
oralloy
 
  -4  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 03:11 am
@BillRM,
Just a few posts up you referred to justified self defense as "murder by polices or others":
https://able2know.org/topic/355218-4675#post-7042211

Trayvon Martin was shot in justified self defense as he tried to murder the captain of his local neighborhood watch.

Michael Brown was shot in justified self defense as he tried to murder a police officer.

Alton Sterling was shot in justified self defense as he tried to murder police officers.

Eric Garner died from injuries that he sustained while resisting a lawful arrest.

Oscar Grant was accidentally shot while resisting a lawful arrest.

Philando Castile was shot because he ignored clear commands to keep his hands visible and reached for an unknown object.

Terence Crutcher was shot because he ignored clear commands to keep his hands visible and reached for an unknown object.

Tamir Rice was shot because he pointed a very realistic looking toy gun at police officers.

Sandra Bland committed suicide in her jail cell.
BillRM
 
  2  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 04:05 am
@oralloy,
First comment my bet is that if it was a very young white child was playing with a toy gun he would not had been shot as the police would had taken greater care toward a child that could had been their.

Children play with toy guns all the time an white children are not normally gun down as a result.

My bet is if it had been a white child an if the police had gun him down they would had been facing manslaughter charges at least..
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 05:06 am
@Wilso,
Wilso wrote:

Quote:
"It's safe. It doesn't cause problems. I had no problem. I had absolutely no problem, felt no different. Didn't feel good, bad or indifferent. And I tested, as you know, it didn't, it didn't get me. And it's not going to hopefully hurt anybody. So we know from that sample because it's been so many years from a safety standpoint, it's safe. I happen to think, based on what I've read, I've read a lot about hydroxy. I happen to think that it has an impact, especially at the early years," he said.


For **** sake. Seriously? Who are the biggest idiots? Trump, or the brainless, inbred, buck-toothed morons who voted for him?


A question for the ages. Every time I come down on the side of Trump being more ignorant and classless than his supporters...one of his supporters comes along to show the supporters may very well be more ignorant and classless than he.

I suspect social scientists will debate this question for a very long time.

VERY LONG.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 05:44 am
Nearly 43 percent of the ambassadors nominated by Trump have not undergone the regular training for diplomats, but were selected on the basis of political motives.
In other Western democracies it is unusual to rely on political supporters rather than formally qualified diplomats.

Appointments - Donald J. Trump

Trump's actions may be illegal. For example, the Foreign Service Act of 1980 stipulates that ambassadors should come from a diplomatic background and have the necessary experience. Politically motivated appointments are therefore legal, but should be the exception.

'Beyond the pale': antics of Trump ambassadors highlight crisis in US diplomacy
Quote:
The president has given key diplomatic roles to big donors – who have stood out for their lack of qualifications or aptitude

The US ambassador to Iceland, a dermatologist and major Republican donor, reportedly became so paranoid about his security he asked to carry a gun and to be taken everywhere in an armoured car.

Despite the absence of particular security concerns, the embassy in Reykjavik advertised in the local press for bodyguards, to placate the ambassador, Jeffrey Ross Gunter.

Gunter’s alleged antics are not an isolated case. A record share of Donald Trump’s ambassadorial appointments have been political, mostly rewards for big-money donors, and his nominees have frequently stood out for their lack of qualifications or aptitude.

A report to be published on Tuesday by Senate Democrats on the current situation at the state department, titled Diplomacy in Crisis, said: “While it is true that every administration has its share of questionable appointments, the Trump administration’s choices have gone beyond the pale, jeopardizing the department’s ability to safeguard our nation’s interests.”

Since being nominated May 2019, Gunter has proved so hard to work with he has gone through seven deputy chiefs of mission (DCMs), career diplomats who do most of the day-to-day management of the embassy. According to CBS News, he rejected his first deputy, who had spent months learning Icelandic, because he “didn’t like the look of him” at their introductory meeting.

Gunter also reportedly refused to return to his post after attending a conference in Washington in February, arguing he could do the job remotely, and was only coaxed back to Reykjavik in May after a call from the secretary of state, Mike Pompeo.

The state department said that Gunter’s return was delayed by the coronavirus pandemic.

CBS reported that Gunter was persuaded not to make a formal request for a gun permit to the Icelandic authorities, who have very strict firearms laws.

Gunter did not immediately respond to a request to comment, but after the CBS report, he issued a statement to the Icelandic press, saying: “Our focus at the US embassy remains where it has always been – on strengthening the US-Icelandic bilateral relationship which brings so much benefit to both our great nations. I am honored to be leading our team during this successful period of US-Icelandic appreciation and respect.”

On the question of the ambassador’s preoccupation with his personal security, a state department spokesperson said: “Protection programs for our leadership are standard features at most US facilities around the world. We continue to have a very close working relationship with Icelandic authorities on security and other matters.”

Gunter is far from being the only wealthy Trump-donor-turned-diplomat to stand out for their eccentricities. The ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, a billionaire Trump backer, has been investigated by the state department office of the inspector general (before the inspector general was fired in May) for racist and sexist remarks.

Johnson is reported to have resisted holding Black History Month events in 2018, asking his aides whether he would be addressing “a whole bunch of black people”. He was also reported to have held a number of official functions at a men-only London club, White’s.

Johnson rejected the charges. He wrote on Twitter: “I have followed the ethical rules and requirements of my office at all times. These false claims of insensitive remarks about race and gender are totally inconsistent with my longstanding record and values.”

Johnson’s former DCM, Lewis Lukens, claimed in December that the ambassador had fired him because he had mentioned Barack Obama in a speech to British university students.

Lana Marks was a handbag designer and member of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club before he made her ambassador to South Africa, where she also forced out her DCM, amid concerns that she was seeking to install her son in a senior role in the embassy, after she referred to him as her “chief of staff” in a tweet, which she later deleted.

Marks told Foreign Policy that she had removed her DCM, David Young, because “our management styles were quite different” and was seeking to get him a more senior job elsewhere. US officials said there was no connection between Young’s departure and Marks’ son.

“The rate at which DCMs are being removed, and the reasoning behind the removals, has created cause for concern,” the Senate Democratic report, said. “In the process, the department lost significant institutional knowledge and substantive experience.”

The report includes a litany of cases of unqualified or unvetted diplomatic nominees. It notes the recent case of Mina Chang, who was given a senior state department job despite having limited relevant experience and allegedly padding her résumé with exaggerated accounts of her career, claiming to have served on a UN panel that did not exist. There was even a fake Time magazine cover about her accomplishments.

Chang resigned but denied the allegations against her. She said the Time cover was done by an enthusiastic supporter, although Chang did not correct an interviewer who presented it in 2017 as an example of her achievements.

Christine Toretti, nominated in May 2018 to serve as ambassador to Malta, had been subject to a restraining order in 2008 for “placing a bullet-riddled target sheet” in the office of her ex-husband’s doctor.

Ronald Neumann, the head of the American Academy of Diplomacy and former deputy assistant secretary of state, said that the Trump diplomatic record was “somewhat outside the norm in numbers, and I think further outside the norm in poor quality of political appointees”.

Of the 189 US ambassadorial posts, only three are currently held by African Americans, according to the American Foreign Service Association. The increasing share of top jobs going to Trump donors have also served to close off avenues of career advancement in general, leading to an exodus of aspiring diplomats.

Between July 2017 and June 2018, according to the Senate Democratic report, 722 full-time, non-seasonal employees left the state department, about 7% of the total staff.

A state department spokesperson rejected widespread reports of low morale, using one of Pompeo’s favourite buzzwords.

“The state department’s swagger is fully back,” the spokesperson said. “From day one, Secretary Pompeo has delivered on advancing the interests and values of the American people both here at home and around the world.”


0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Wed 29 Jul, 2020 07:47 am
Quote:
With an umbrella in his left hand and a hammer in his right, the man in black lobbed his weapon so nonchalantly into an auto parts shop’s windows that it surprised many others in Minneapolis marching nearby in a May 27 protest after George Floyd’s death.

Soon after the abrupt attack, the mostly calm demonstration near a police precinct erupted into looting and arson — the first fire in riots that eventually caused $500 million in damage and left two people dead, the Associated Press reported.

For weeks afterward, activists and Internet commenters homed in on a viral video of the figure nicknamed “Umbrella Man,” speculating that his intent was actually to turn the peaceful protests destructive.

On Tuesday, Minneapolis police identified him as an affiliate of a white supremacist group that allegedly sought to “incite violence,” according to a search warrant affidavit filed in the Hennepin County District Court. The Star Tribune first reported of the warrant. The 32-year-old man has not been charged.


WP
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.48 seconds on 07/07/2025 at 01:18:54