monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

If there is a vaccine, it must be available to everyone. Anything else would be a scandal.

just as the coronavirus rips through nursing homes.

You gotta remember: A lot of these same people also believe [Trump is] “sent from God”.

Who will pay for it to be mass-produced and distributed?

What if developers keep it private and distribute it via secret networks of rich people who pay very high prices?

Coincidence? I think not.

livinglava wrote:

Who will pay for it to be mass-produced and distributed?

CureVac is a biopharmaceutical company, focused on developing vaccines for infectious diseases and drugs to treat for cancer and rare diseases. They've an own production facility. The distribution is done like it's done with any other medical product.

livinglava wrote:

What if developers keep it private and distribute it via secret networks of rich people who pay very high prices?

Vaccination is done here exclusively by medical practitioners ("doctors") here.
I sincerely doubt that someone can produce any medical product and earn money without selling it.

Patients will be diagnosed and treated.

Are they going to produce and distribute it on a global scale then?

livinglava wrote:

Are they going to produce and distribute it on a global scale then?

I'm not related to that company nor do I know how and to what countries they sell their their various vaccines generally

Here's an example of a character posting an opinion and attempting to camouflage it with a misapplied "fact":
https://able2know.org/topic/355218-4124#post-6971961

Trump Supporters Know Where to Turn in a Crisis: To Him

But I am not claiming opinion as fact there. That is an actual fact. This fact is proven by the fact that no one can put forth any alternative motivation for his attempts to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles.

If it's unethical for Trump to buy the rights and then keep them for the US exclusively, then is it any more ethical for any other owner/producer/distributor to produce/distribute the vaccine in a way that results in exclusion in one way or another?

livinglava wrote:

If it's unethical for Trump to buy the rights and then keep them for the US exclusively, then is it any more ethical for any other owner/producer/distributor to produce/distribute the vaccine in a way that results in exclusion in one way or another?

I've posted nothing about any other producer, don't know anything of such.

But as far as I know (just what has been published during the last two decades), this company sold their products without limitation.

But I am not claiming opinion as fact there. That is an actual fact. This fact is proven by the fact that no one can put forth any alternative motivation for his attempts to outlaw pistol grips on semi-auto rifles.

The ATF used an affidavit filed by Davy Aguilera to obtain the warrant that led to the Waco siege. The official filing date of this Affidavit was 25th of February 1993. Allegedly, the initial investigation began in June of 1992 when a postal worker informed a Sheriff of McClennan County that he believed he had been delivering explosives to the ammo and gun store owned and operated by the Branch Davidians. This store, named the "Mag-Bag", had been identified by said postal worker as suspicious in deliveries. The postal worker continued deliveries to the Mt. Carmel Center and reported seeing manned observation posts; in the affidavit, it states he believed they were armed personnel at these observations posts.

The McClennan county sheriff was notified in May and June of that year of two cases of inert grenades, black gunpowder, 90 pounds of powdered aluminum metal, and 30-40 cardboard tubes. Furthermore, the sheriff noticed another shipment of sixty AR-15/M-16 magazines, to which Davy Aguilera made the statement, "I have been involved in many cases where defendants, following a relatively simple process, convert AR-15 semi-automatic rifles to fully automatic rifles of the nature of the M-16" to justify the ATF's involvement in the case.

Another report was made to the Sheriff in November of 1992 by a local farmer who believed he heard machine gun fire. "By the sound of it," he said, "it was likely a .50 caliber machine gun and multiple M-16's." This farmer claimed he was very familiar with machine guns, having done a tour overseas in the U.S Army. The affidavit closes with Aguilera verifying the story via interviews made with associated parties and gun shops from which the Mag-Bag purchased items. Among these items were over forty-five AR-15 upper receivers and five M-16 upper receivers, which Aguilera clearly annotates, "These kits contain all the parts of an M-16 machine gun except for the lower receiver unit which is the "firearm" by lawful definition," admitting that neither the noise complaints nor the items ordered were necessarily illegal.

The reason for outlawing pistol grips on semi-automatic rifles is that it facilitates the use of kits which can be used to convert semi-automatic rifles to a functional fully-automatic operation.

In the Waco/Branch Davidian debacle. ATF obtained their search warrant on the basis of AR15 rifles possibly being modified to turn them effectively into M16 fully-automatic assault rifles. The WACO standoff began when people in the compound fired on ATF agents who came to serve the search warrant and conduct the search.

The objection to pistol grips on semi-automatic rifles is precisely that it facilitates the conversion of semi-automatic rifles to fully automatic operation.

Your sick repetition of violating peoples' civil liberties for sadistic pleasure only serves to both show that you are parading your opinions as fact, and that the sick person here is you.