192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Builder
 
  -4  
Tue 26 Dec, 2017 09:00 pm
@layman,
Quote:
".....by definition, them Trump-haters aint "truly loving people."


And they just don't see that in themselves. They attack anyone in a personal way, if that person doesn't share their tunnel-vision, but can't actually get their heads around how they are the type of person they think they are attacking. Gaslighting, without even knowing they do it.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
hightor
 
  3  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 03:19 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Not really or they wouldn't be going into default.

They're in default precisely because they can't meet their obligation to pay it back. They aren't receiving grants. The loans are issued with the understanding that they will be paid back with interest. States and municipalities can't run trillion dollar debts into the future the way the federal government can.
Builder
 
  -3  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 03:57 am
@hightor,
Your statement was that states cannot operate on deficit spending.

Take it as read that you've been proven wrong yet again, Hi.
hightor
 
  4  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 04:46 am
@Builder,
They cannot operate with a structural deficit. The federal government can. I already addressed my initial misstatement about "deficit spending" and my erroneous use of "18 billion" when I meant "18 trillion".
Quote:
Requirements that states balance their budgets are often said to be a major difference between state and federal budgeting. State officials certainly take an obligation to balance the budget seriously, and in the debate over a federal balanced budget in the early- and mid-1990s, much of the discussion centered on the states' with balanced budgets. This article is concerned with the nature, definition and enforcement of state balanced-budget requirements.

Nature of state balanced-budget requirements All the states except Vermont have a legal requirement of a balanced budget. Some are constitutional, some are statutory, and some have been derived by judicial decision from constitutional provisions about state indebtedness that do not, on their face, call for a balanced budget. The General Accounting Office has commented that "some balanced budget requirements are based on interpretations of state constitutions and statutes rather than on an explicit statement that the state must have a balanced budget."

The requirements vary in stringency from state to state. In some states the requirement is that the introduced budget be balanced, or that the enacted budget be balanced. In other states policymakers are required to ensure that expenditures in a fiscal year stay within the cash available for that fiscal year. Other states may carry unavoidable deficits into the next fiscal year for resolution.

There are three general kinds of state balanced budget requirements:

1. The governor's proposed budget must be balanced (43 states and Puerto Rico).
2. The budget the legislature passes must be balanced (39 states and Puerto Rico).
3. The budget must be balanced at the end of a fiscal year or biennium, so that no deficit can be carried forward (37 states and Puerto Rico).

In each case, it is practically impossible for revenues and expenditures to get out of balance, since expenditures are controlled by available funds.

(...)

Unlike the federal government, states are not able to issue debt routinely. Issues of general obligation debt require at least the approval of the legislature and in many states, voter approval. The issue of revenue bonds requires legislation to create an agency to issue bonds and the creation of a revenue stream to repay the debt. These practices mean that the issuance of debt is fully in the public view. It is extremely rare for a state government to borrow long-term funds to cover operating expenses, although. Louisiana did in 1988 and Connecticut did in 1991. There do not appear to be any other examples of this practice from recent years.

A legislature and governor can jointly revise a budget at any time. But most legislatures are not in session throughout the year, and some legislatures meet only for a few months every other year. Requiring legislative consent for every change in a budget would impose delays or the costs of special sessions. Therefore, many state constitutions allow governors or special commissions to revise budgets after they have been enacted to bring expenditures into line with revenues


NCSL

I stick by my original point; it's irresponsible for politicians to use tax cuts to curry favor with the electorate in the face of massive debts, especially after historically attacking "deficit spending" for decades.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 06:02 am
Israel's transport minister is pushing ahead with a plan to extend Jerusalem's soon-to-open high speed rail line to the Western Wall, where he wants to name a future station after President Donald Trump.
The proposal will likely face opposition from the international community, which does not recognise Israeli sovereignty over east Jerusalem.
The Tel Aviv-Jerusalem high-speed line is expected to open next spring.

The Guardian: Israeli minister plans to name Western Wall train station after Trump
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 06:25 am
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
Re: Finn dAbuzz (Post 6564133)
Did you know that George W. Bush and Michelle Obama are friends? (I think it's neat.)
Also true in the case of Clinton and Bush Sr. And yes, it is neat.

That nothing like this will happen with Trump is just one more indicator of how abnormal (in a bad way) he is. Just try to imagine Trump speaking about a future president without Trump demeaning the guy's election results or his administration's productivity or historical importance so as to suggest this new president is, compared to Trump, a loser.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 07:19 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
She's full of ****.

Oh. So you're saying it didn't happen?
Quote:
She doesn't have 1/100th the grace of W

Apparently neither do you.

The point of the article was to compare Bush II's behavior to Trump's, not to Streisand's. <eyeroll>
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
revelette1
 
  5  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 08:38 am
Washington Times is completely biased; I am sure they have distorted the truth of McCabe's testimony. When a transcript becomes available I'll look it up. Saying he can't confirm all of it does not mean parts of it wasn't confirmed. Page has already confirmed he met with Russian officials during a House Intelligence committee.

Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier (Business Insider)

Quote:
The House Intelligence Committee on Monday released the full transcript of the former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page's testimony before the panel last week, portions of which support details in an explosive collection of memos outlining alleged collusion between the campaign and Moscow before the 2016 US election.

Page revealed during his testimony that he met with members of Russia's presidential administration and the head of investor relations at the Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft during his trip to Moscow in July 2016.

He also congratulated members of the Trump campaign's foreign-policy team on July 14 for their "excellent work" on the "Ukraine amendment" — a reference to the Trump campaign's decision to "intervene," a representative previously told Business Insider, to water down a proposed amendment to the GOP's Ukraine platform.
blatham
 
  4  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 08:48 am
Sure, the modern right has gone insane. We knew that. Still, some instances of the thing can startle.
Quote:
Tennesseans will be allowed to bring their guns to the new home of the legislature but must leave any hand-held signs behind, according to a recently implemented policy.

The policy, which Lt. Gov. Randy McNally, R-Oak Ridge, and House Speaker Beth Harwell, R-Nashville, approved Dec. 14, expressly prohibits "hand-carried signs and signs on hand sticks" because they "represent a serious safety hazard."
Tennessean
blatham
 
  6  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 08:59 am
Russian trolls working to undermine Americans' faith in Meuller and the FBI
Quote:
Michael Morell, who ran the CIA, and Michael Rogers, former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, wrote in an op-ed in The Washington Post that Russia is still busy using its social media tools to create doubt across the U.S. about Mueller’s integrity.

“There is a perception among the media and general public that Russia ended its social media operations following last year’s election and that we need worry only about future elections,” the pair wrote. “But that perception is wrong. Russia’s information operations in the United States continued after the election, and they continue to this day.”

During one week in early December, for example, roughly 20 percent of the activity from accounts tied to Russian intelligence for propaganda was focused on undermining faith in Mueller’s investigation into potential collusion between Russia and the successful campaign of Donald Trump, according to research by The Alliance for Securing Democracy.
Newsweek
But this is only because Putin wants America to be great again. Honest.
0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Below viewing threshold (view)
hightor
 
  5  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 09:42 am
No surprise here:

Editor Admits Breitbart Publishes Fake News
Quote:
It is useful to know that you can’t believe a thing Breitbart says, because it’s willing to publish fake news that serves its perceived interests. I mean, you knew this anyway, but now you’ve had it confirmed by the editor-in-chief.
hightor
 
  2  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 09:50 am
@layman,
The story about the "Ukraine Amendment" is from 2016, of course.

So what caused Trump to change his mind? The fall of Manafort? The exit of Bannon? The influence of Mattis or other members of the military establishment? Any idea? He was pretty adamant that there was no Russian threat to Ukraine during the campaign .
layman
 
  -4  
Wed 27 Dec, 2017 10:28 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:


Kinda strange, eh? There's no place in either this article or the linked article it cites where the "Editor Admits Breitbart Publishes Fake News."

Now that's REAL fake news, eh?

I notice that you didn't quote any part of the article other than the author restating his false claim. Do you ever read past the false clickbait headline when it says want you would like to believe, Hi?

I didn't think so.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 09/19/2024 at 09:34:43