10
   

Are the presidential election results real? Or simply a simulation?

 
 
oristarA
 
  2  
Reply Sun 29 Jan, 2017 09:49 am
Now, The World Has A Baby Emperor

Trump aides can't stop blabbing about how he's a madman

By Eric Levitz (NYMagazine)

Quote:
The president is a 70-year-old child whose TV time must be closely monitored — because any news story that upsets his ego will trigger a temper tantrum followed by irrational demands that his indulgent, overwhelmed guardians will be helpless to refuse.
......

Nearly a dozen of Trump’s closest confidantes helped plant an embarrassing news story about how their boss can’t handle embarrassing news stories. Which is to say: A president who prizes loyalty in his subordinates has already been betrayed by a huge swath of his inner circle.

More


0 Replies
 
Adrenaline1234
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jan, 2017 09:57 am
@oristarA,
Of course it's not real, we man just plotted against women.
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jan, 2017 08:10 pm
@Adrenaline1234,
Is "we man" like heman?

Sounds like a conspiracy theory, to me.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Jan, 2017 09:05 pm
@Adrenaline1234,
I wasn't invited into this plot. In my view, it was women who lost this election to Trump.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2017 12:39 am
@Adrenaline1234,
Adrenaline1234 wrote:

Of course it's not real, we man just plotted against women.


Eh...are you saying that your words are real?

So you plotted against women. For example, against:

http://www.bollywoodbiography.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/tiffany-trump-2.png
http://www.bollywoodbiography.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ivanka-trump-1.jpg

Are they beautiful? Are they hot? Are they worth being plotted against? Of course YES in your dark mind.

But I'm afraid that their dad is going to fix you. Because their dad is none other than the very baby emperor Donald Trump.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2017 06:54 am
Will Jordan tweeted hours ago (Click the link)

Days until achieving MAJORITY disapproval from @Gallup

Reagan: 727
Bush I: 1336
Clinton: 573
Bush II: 1205
Obama: 936

Trump: 8. days:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3XD9pfWYAMInut.jpg
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Jan, 2017 04:01 pm
@oristarA,
What about congress? Has their approval rate gone above 15% in the last decade?

0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2017 11:42 am
The Road to Impeachment

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3fthtuVMAAWJTB.jpg
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Feb, 2017 12:06 pm
A Clarifying Moment in American History

There should be nothing surprising about what Donald Trump has done in his first week—but he has underestimated the resilience of Americans and their institutions.

by ELIOT A. COHEN (The Atlantic)

......
Some Americans can fight abuses of power and disastrous policies directly—in courts, in congressional offices, in the press. But all can dedicate themselves to restoring the qualities upon which this republic, like all republics depends: on reverence for the truth; on a sober patriotism grounded in duty, moderation, respect for law, commitment to tradition, knowledge of our history, and open-mindedness. These are all the opposites of the qualities exhibited by this president and his advisers. Trump, in one spectacular week, has already shown himself one of the worst of our presidents, who has no regard for the truth (indeed a contempt for it), whose patriotism is a belligerent nationalism, whose prior public service lay in avoiding both the draft and taxes, who does not know the Constitution, does not read and therefore does not understand our history, and who, at his moment of greatest success, obsesses about approval ratings, how many people listened to him on the Mall, and enemies.

...


More
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2017 10:01 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

The Road to Impeachment



(From Public Policy Polling)
February 02, 2017
After 2 Weeks, Voters Yearn For Obama

Less than 2 weeks into Donald Trump's tenure as President, 40% of voters already want to impeach him. That's up from 35% of voters who wanted to impeach him a week ago. Only 48% of voters say that they would be opposed to Trump's impeachment.

More
roger
 
  2  
Reply Sat 4 Feb, 2017 05:00 pm
@oristarA,
Only 48% opposed? Somehow, you make that sound like a very small number, while 40% in favor comes out sounding like a very large number.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Feb, 2017 12:40 am
@roger,
roger wrote:

Only 48% opposed? Somehow, you make that sound like a very small number, while 40% in favor comes out sounding like a very large number.


Good catch.

But compare it to two week presidency, 40% is very high while 48% is rather low.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  2  
Reply Sun 5 Feb, 2017 12:48 am
Trump's vocation vs. vacation

Two weeks for vocation, $3 million for vacation.

Politico:

Trump’s Mar-a-Lago getaway could cost taxpayers more than $3 million
The president regularly hassled Obama for his travel. Now Trump is about to get a taste of his own medicine.
By MATTHEW NUSSBAUM 02/03/17 05:12 AM EST

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C333T_NUcAAPLnt.jpg
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Feb, 2017 01:10 am
Trump's whining about the checks and balances of powers:

Quote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 1d1 day ago
The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Feb, 2017 08:14 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

Trump's vocation vs. vacation

Two weeks for vocation, $3 million for vacation.

Politico:

Trump’s Mar-a-Lago getaway could cost taxpayers more than $3 million
The president regularly hassled Obama for his travel. Now Trump is about to get a taste of his own medicine.
By MATTHEW NUSSBAUM 02/03/17 05:12 AM EST



The baby emperor contradicts himself once again:

Quote:
Trump: No 'big' vacations, no salary as president
David M Jackson , USA TODAY Published 7:34 p.m. ET Nov. 13, 2016 |

Donald Trump is pledging no long vacations and no presidential salary during his time in the White House.

"There's just so much to be done," Trump told CBS' 60 Minutes in an interview broadcast Sunday. "So I don't think we'll be very big on vacations, no."

As for the president's $400,000-a-year pay, the New York businessman said: "No, I'm not going to take the salary. I'm not taking it."

Republicans have regularly criticized President Obama for his fondness for playing golf and his family vacations in Hawaii.



Didn't you promise you would reject $400,000-a-year pay? Now you want to take $3 million from the Federal government for your two-week work (should it be "work"?), Mr President?




0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  2  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2017 08:50 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

Trump's whining about the checks and balances of powers:

Quote:
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 1d1 day ago
The opinion of this so-called judge, which essentially takes law-enforcement away from our country, is ridiculous and will be overturned!



And this so-called president has a dream like this?:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4CVUgGUMAAEoku.jpg
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Feb, 2017 10:29 am
@oristarA,


How about FDR who threatened to pack the court with judges so he could get his "New Deal" passed when if it was to be challenged in the courts?
oristarA
 
  2  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2017 07:42 am
@Baldimo,
Times have changed.

Today it is a time of "precision strike", while in FDR days, nuking Japan was still acceptable.

Tell President Trump: Hit terrorists with precision, blocking them. Don't target all the people from the countries where terrorists live and hide.


giujohn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2017 09:38 am
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

Times have changed.

Today it is a time of "precision strike", while in FDR days, nuking Japan was still acceptable.

Tell President Trump: Hit terrorists with precision, blocking them. Don't target all the people from the countries where terrorists live and hide.




He's only targeting countries with Muslim populations where terrorists come from where there is either no accountable government or a government who refuses to cooperate with us regarding terrorism or share intelligence with us like Saudi Arabia and Egypt.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Feb, 2017 02:18 am
@giujohn,
giujohn wrote:

He's only targeting countries with Muslim populations where terrorists come from where there is either no accountable government or a government who refuses to cooperate with us regarding terrorism or share intelligence with us like Saudi Arabia and Egypt.


Quote:


Where America's Terrorists Actually Come From
Syrian refugees have committed zero attacks in the United States.

by URI FRIEDMAN JAN 30, 2017 (The Atlantic)
......
after sifting through databases, media reports, court documents, and other sources, Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration expert at the libertarian Cato Institute, has arrived at a striking finding: Nationals of the seven countries singled out by Trump have killed zero people in terrorist attacks on U.S. soil between 1975 and 2015.

Zero.

Six Iranians, six Sudanese, two Somalis, two Iraqis, and one Yemeni have been convicted of attempting or executing terrorist attacks on U.S. soil during that time period, according to Nowrasteh’s research. (Nowrasteh focused on plots against the U.S. homeland, which presumably Trump cares most about, rather than other terrorism-related offenses, like supporting a foreign terrorist group or trying to join a jihadist organization overseas.) Zero Libyans and zero Syrians have been convicted of doing the same. “Foreign-born terrorism is a hazard,” Nowrasteh argues, “but it is manageable given the huge economic benefits of immigration and the small costs of terrorism.”

As for refugees, Nowrasteh writes, Trump’s action “is a response to a phantom menace.” Over the last four decades, 20 out of 3.25 million refugees welcomed to the United States have been convicted of attempting or committing terrorism on U.S. soil, and only three Americans have been killed in attacks committed by refugees—all by Cuban refugees in the 1970s.

Zero Americans have been killed by Syrian refugees in a terrorist attack in the United States.

More


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 08:47:42