30
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ? Part 2

 
 
Builder
 
  -4  
Reply Wed 19 Oct, 2016 11:02 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
The founders of this country were wealthy and powerful.


And built their wealth on slavery.

Quote:
4 of the last Presidents (I'm including Hillary) have been born out of the lower middle class.


That might explain Hillary taking all that "stuff" from the whitehouse on their first time there, right? Just taking the bath towels and stuff.

You missed my point entirely, re the difference in the way the law is treating those on the street (death for unpaid fines) and in power (I misremember lying about that) .
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 19 Oct, 2016 11:04 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
They say Russian hackers did it.


Nothing like a good dose of hindsight, right? I mean Bush knew within an hour that it was Osama Bin Laden who dropped those towers, right? Had warnings from several other nations about it, but did jack **** about it.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 12:46 am
@DrewDad,
DrewDad wrote:
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

"I did have sexual relations with that woman."


Make your bloody mind up.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  6  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 06:53 am
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

It's easily addressable. Ask Podesta to release his emails if they are not true.

Sure, and you can provide your tax records for the last 15 years. I overheard someone saying you're a tax cheat. Prove that you're not.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  10  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 09:35 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
It's easily addressable. Ask Podesta to release his emails if they are not true.


WikiLeaks had no right to Podesta's emails and Podesta certainly has no obligation to release his emails validating the theft of the emails in the first place. Do you have no care at all that our intelligence agencies have confirmed Russia is behind the hacks? This time it was Hillary Clinton who was the target of a foreign country meddling in our elections and stealing information they had no right to, so you may have no problem with it. The next time it could be anyone. Are we now going to accept other countries interfering in our elections or anything else on partisan grounds now?
Real Music
 
  4  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 10:33 am
Russia is a not an ally of the United States. In fact Russia is an adversary of the United States. There is clear solid evidence that this adversary is attempting to influence the presidential election of the United States. It is also clear that Donald Trump is truly a friend and ally of Russia. In fact Donald Trump one sided allegiance to Russia makes Donald Trump himself to be an adversary of the United States.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 11:29 am
@RABEL222,
Quote Rabel22:
Quote:
Not knocking Obama but he hasent pushed Putin like he should have.

Ukraine is not a NATO country, so we are not obligated to defend it militarily. Russia took over the Crimea peninsula, which belonged to Ukraine and which had the only warm water Naval Base Russia has, (Russia leased the land from the Kiev government). Russia also armed rebels in Eastern Ukraine near the Russian border and started a civil war. The United States sent troops to train the Ukrainian Army to help them fight the rebels. Against Russia, which is totally dependent on oil exports, Obama upped US domestic production, then worked a deal with the Saudi so they would not cut back production to boost prices. The price of oil fell hugely, Russia's economy went into a Depression, the ruble is now worth less than half of what it was worth two years ago before the Crimean invasion.

http://i1382.photobucket.com/albums/ah279/LeviStubbs/Ruble%20vs%20dollar%202%20year%20chart%20Aug%204%202015_zpsch3jqghb.jpg
Obama also followed through on previous plans to give an antimissile system to former Russian vassal states Romania and Poland. Up to now, the former Soviet breakaway states belonged to NATO, but there were no NATO bases there because we did not want to raise tension with Russia. The anti-missile systems in Romania and Poland serves reminders to Putin that if he wants to play games, he's going to be looking at NATO bases up and down his Eastern European border.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 08:18 pm
@Blickers,
Not talking about Ukraine, Syria is where he is backing down. A few missles on his air force early would have stopped much of the carnage.
Builder
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 10:19 pm
@revelette2,
Quote:
This time it was Hillary Clinton who was the target of a foreign country meddling in our elections and stealing information they had no right to, so you may have no problem with it.


Oh, FFS; never heard of regime change? The US has been "spreading democracy" across several nations since the fifties. Heard of Operation Ajax? We even got a watered-down apology from a former sec of state (Maddy Albright) to the Iranian people for that murderous torture episode. And that was just the start.

Never heard of the first law of physics? Cause and effect.

Get some effect in your pipe, and smoke it.

And Russia donated lots of cash to the Clinton foundation, possibly to sweeten a deal with her on some yellow cake (that's an assumption shared).

0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2016 10:37 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Syria is where he is backing down.


And it isn't obvious why he had to back down? Pretending to be after ISIL, while directing their attacks, mistakenly dropping weapons and other supplies, and allowing them to truck oil out of the Golan heights. Putin knew exactly what was going on, and it doesn't take any imagination to know why Obama had to back down.
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 02:30 am
https://theintercept.com/2016/10/15/d-c-hivemind-mulls-how-clinton-can-pass-huge-corporate-tax-cut/

Hillary gives an enormous tax break to corporations. You pay for it.

https://theintercept.com/2016/10/15/d-c-hivemind-mulls-how-clinton-can-pass-huge-corporate-tax-cut/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 05:09 am
@Builder,
Quote:
allowing them to truck oil out of the Golan heights


Israel has occupied the Golan Heights for over four decades. There is no oil production in the Golan.
Builder
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 05:30 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
There is no oil production in the Golan.


Production began in 2014. Try and keep up.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 06:08 am
Latest recap of Hillary.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 06:27 am
https://theintercept.com/2016/10/19/a-peek-into-the-clinton-campaign-in-damage-control-mode-from-the-podesta-emails/

Hillary caught in a lie, rabidly tries to force those her lie damages to lie for her.

Quite an astonishingly unaccountable, entitled liar.

ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 08:12 am
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

Clinton
268 / 203 / 65
Trump
167 / 87 / 80

103


http://www.270towin.com/maps/clinton-trump-electoral-map

quite a jump from Trump to toss-up since the beginning of the week

Clinton 272 / 203 / 69
Trump 112 / 32 / 80

154
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 08:16 am
@ehBeth,
When they force the electoral college to no toss-ups, things have really changed since about a month ago.

Quote:
Electoral College Projections as of October 19th
Clinton vs. Trump: No Toss-up Map
This isn't a popularity contestâ„¢
This map will track the electoral vote count for the 2016 presidential election based on polling.

This version of the electoral map based on polls assigns states to Clinton or Trump with no toss-ups (unless exactly tied in the polls). Whichever candidate leads in our polling average, even if by just 0.1%, 'wins' the state.

For more information and individual poll results, see the polling averages page or visit the polling map that includes toss-ups and color gradients based on spread between Clinton and Trump



Clinton
351

Trump
187

http://www.270towin.com/maps/clinton-trump-no-tossup-states
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 02:12 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Quite an astonishingly unaccountable, entitled liar.


Worse still is that those who she didn't support then, are helping her to cover up for her BS.
Lash
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 05:13 pm
@Builder,
Money talks, average citizens walk.
Builder
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 21 Oct, 2016 07:51 pm
@Lash,
From your article, they're all trying to find out what they said back when Hillary was claiming their support, (but didn't have it) so they don't look like liars themselves.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/02/2022 at 10:18:39