@Blickers,
Those are your words, not mine.
The record of these events as described variously by; Hillary herself, The State Department IG, the NSA reviewers and the FBI Director, etc. are inconsistent and contradictory in a number of points, so questions of veracity exist before any hackers are involved. You appear to be ignoring all that.
Let's suppose that Assange releases some alleged Hillary e mails that were not among those Hillary provided in printed paper form to the State Department. What shall we make of them? No direct comparison can be made because Hillary ordered the destruction of the electronic records in violation of existing law and Federal regulation. The State Department has already released some official e mails ( from the files of those in government who received them) which were not included among those she disclosed to the State Department. Thus we already know her disclosure was not complete (though whether that was done knowingly or accidentally we don't know).
I'll ask you, -- should such released alleged e mails be believed or discounted out of hand? I believe the right answer is that if they are important they should be investigated to determine the facts as well as possible. Unfortunately, in the present circumstances, and with the present administarion, that isn't likely. As a result, in the minds of many, Hillary will be suspected. I ask you, whose fault is that? I suspect it is the person who ordered the destruction of the electronic records in the first place, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Deception and lies breed, suspicion, confuson and more lies. What goes around comes around.