Rio 2016 - Fantasy Olympics Game

Right, but I was trying to see what I had going re China and Japan and didn't understand how the Rio link works, if they post at the end of a day or momentarily as numbers come in. You asked us to let you know if we saw some error in our numbers, but I don't know how to tell. On the other hand, I don't really want to be always checking numbers - I'll leave it to you and be happpy.

Silver to one of my neighbours !!!!!! (ok - 3 blocks away - but still !!!!)

I wrote a python program to scrape data from:
https://www.rio2016.com/en/medal-count-sports

Here's what I get for everybody:

And here's what I get for the countries with medals:

ossobucotemp, no need to check numbers so long as I input the gold, silver, bronze winners in correctly the standings will be spot on. My table is automatically generated from the results so as long as my table matches the olympic table here https://www.google.co.uk/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=o4KnV_SWEcvU8geFsreoCQ&gws_rd=ssl#q=olympics+2016&mie=oly%2C%5B%22%2Fm%2F03tnk7%22%2C1%2C%22m%22%5D we're all good

Here are the standings after day 2

Found a bug in my program (NZE vs NZL).

How did a Canajun team get a Rugby bronze?

So unexpected but Hooray!

I'm impressed with Australia because of the smallish population.

At midnight PDT, this is what I got. Hopefully it matches Skin Rip's.

126 [ 12 17 15] nacredambition
122 [ 12 15 17] markr
122 [ 12 15 17] McGentrix
120 [ 12 16 12] Skin Rip
118 [ 12 14 16] tgordon92
114 [ 12 12 18] Hilarion
112 [ 12 12 16] wheel158
109 [ 11 13 15] fbaezer
106 [ 12 11 13] tsarstepan
103 [ 12 10 13] wheel158son
99 [ 10 11 16] jetabor
97 [ 11 9 15] Sanja
94 [ 10 9 17] ehBeth
82 [ 8 9 15] lmur
73 [ 9 6 10] Ecartmill
71 [ 7 9 9] Ticomaya
70 [ 8 8 6] ossobuco

53 [ 5 7 7] USA
39 [ 5 3 5] CHN
29 [ 3 4 2] ITA
28 [ 3 3 4] USAW
28 [ 2 5 3] RUS
25 [ 2 4 3] USAM
23 [ 4 0 3] AUS
23 [ 3 2 2] CHNM
22 [ 3 0 7] JPN
17 [ 2 2 1] KOR
16 [ 2 1 3] CHNW
15 [ 3 0 0] HUN
14 [ 2 1 1] THA
10 [ 1 1 2] GBR
8 [ 1 1 0] SWE
8 [ 1 1 0] BRA
7 [ 1 0 2] TPE
6 [ 1 0 1] BEL
6 [ 0 2 0] RSA
6 [ 0 2 0] NZL
6 [ 0 2 0] INA
6 [ 0 1 3] CAN
5 [ 1 0 0] VIE
5 [ 1 0 0] NED
5 [ 1 0 0] KOS
5 [ 1 0 0] CRO
5 [ 1 0 0] COL
5 [ 1 0 0] ARG
5 [ 0 1 2] KAZ
4 [ 0 1 1] UKR
3 [ 0 1 0] PRK
3 [ 0 1 0] PHI
3 [ 0 1 0] MGL
3 [ 0 1 0] FRA
3 [ 0 1 0] DEN
3 [ 0 1 0] AZE
2 [ 0 0 2] UZB
1 [ 0 0 1] POR
1 [ 0 0 1] POL
1 [ 0 0 1] GRE
1 [ 0 0 1] GEO
1 [ 0 0 1] ESP

Here are the standings after day 3

Close but Nacredambtion and jetabor are both wrong

DPR Korea wasn't pulling through correctly

126 [ 12 17 15] nacredambition
China Women 2-1-3
USA - Men 2-4-3
France 0-1-0
Japan 3-0-7
South Korea 2-2-1
Brazil 1-1-0
DPR Korea 0-1-0
Kazakhstan 0-1-2
Kenya 0-0-0
New Zealand 0-2-0
Azerbaijan 0-1-0
Colombia 1-0-0
India 0-0-0
Mexico 0-0-0
South Africa 0-2-0

So should be 119
11-16-16

Jetabor is correct

Found my mistake. I had nacredambition down for CHNM instead of CHNW.

Excellent, so if we both match no one is wrong

I modified my app to display our standings every ten minutes (it runs in a command prompt window). Nacredambition has surged into the lead in the past hour or so.

When I typed Nacredambition into a search, I got Naked Ambition. LOL

That hat Tak suggests you will always be able to go: faster - higher - stronger

Citius - Altius - Fortius

My sister, Pearly Lustre , reckons that our mother was quite inventive for some reason.

Here are the standings after Day 4