Abortion. Right or Murder?

I added some balance to your post, as you were focused on the negligence of the female, and not at all on the male. Was that an oversight?

Then whose body is it a part of?

If it is a part of her body, then she has a right to remove it. If it is not a part of her body, she has a right to remove it.

You seem to look at things through a black and white lens. According to you, if the woman gets an abortion, that makes her guilty of murder. Therefore, if you prevent that woman from getting an abortion, and force her to give birth, you are guilty of handing a baby over to the person who attempted to murder that same baby. How do you plead?

And according to the Bible, wasn't Moses guilty of murder? After all, he did order the slaughter of women who were pregnant.

In America this month a man convicted of raping a 12 year old girl was granted joint custody of the child that resulted from that rape. Ain't life beautiful.

I have no problem with people believing whatever it is that gets them through the night but once they start making laws that criminalise people for disagreeing with them then can get lost.

How about feeding and looking after all the children that are already here before you start intruding into women's bodies. Sick, totally sick.

Also. Womb? Who the hell says womb anymore? So ridiculous.

Well, it does sound more touchy/feely than uterus.

Murder is a legal term defined in laws. If the law doesn't say that something is murder, then it is not. You might find abortion morally wrong, but if it is legal, then it ain't murder.

Murder

To me, it is a murder.

Murder is killing of life?

What is killing future lives called?

Your problem is that you are insisting on one answer and everybody is forced to comply with it. Opinions on this topic are about evenly divided, so forcing one answer on everybody violates half the people's rights, no matter which answer. It is ok to let everybody decide for themselves, at least until a consensus forms.

A political party is not a consensus.

How many people they agree with abortion in any stage but they can t do it themselves with their own hands? That is how you have to see it if you agree

How many people would eat a steak, but can't kill and butcher a cow with their own hands/

Yeah exactly. I m ready to eat veggies if i don t find already killed animals .

Exactly. You’re ok with someone else supplying already killed animals though, and would eat and enjoy the benefits gained from them.

Yes because it s not going to make any difference if i eat or not . The same ammount is gonna be killed .

And if people can't get safe legal abortions they're going to go for the backstreet variety.

Right.

You keep proving your own point.

If you don't want to eat meat, don't.
If you don't want an abortion, don't get one.

I'm not going to tell you to do either one, or not do either one.

Not only will abortions go backstreet, but induced personally.

How far does this logic go?

If you don't want a child marriage, don't have one. If you don't want slavery, don't buy a slave for yourself.

It s not simple as you say and it s totally different.

You are killing your own kind and you are implimenting on society that it s ok to do so .
Psycologiclly will harm the same society because of these actions.


A few can be that they are like feeling nothing at all .

like everything in this universe have it s good and bad part, the bad part is that a creature is killed no matter it s stage , the good part is that he or she s not going through this life of possible suffering .

A human life is potential. It's not just a body, it's a a soul. How is it that if someone went into a panda and killed it's young, the entire western world would be outraged.