29
   

Rising fascism in the US

 
 
hightor
 
  4  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 05:50 am
Trump ‘successfully chilled’ FBI from being willing to investigate anything related to him: Peter Strzok

Quote:
FBI agent Peter Strzok on Wednesday said former President Trump and others “successfully chilled the FBI’s willingness to investigate anything” Trump-related, complicating later inquiries into the former president’s handling of classified document.

Strzok took to Twitter to comment on new reporting from The Washington Post indicating that FBI agents and Justice Department prosecutors squabbled over how aggressively to criminally investigate Trump’s handling of classified documents, including whether to conduct a surprise search of his Florida residence.

“Trump, [Attorney General William] Barr, [special counsel John] Durham, and others successfully chilled the FBI’s willingness to investigate anything related to Trump. The FBI handled Trump with unprecedented kid gloves, afraid to follow the facts for fear of political blowback, delaying the investigation for months,” Strzok wrote in one tweet.

The FBI executed a search warrant of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence and recovered more than a hundred classified materials this summer, but the Post article suggests some agents wanted to cut off the criminal investigation into Trump’s document handling beforehand, after Trump’s team had said they turned over all the materials.

“How’d that work out? Oh, right, Trump still had 100+ docs,” Strzok said.

Strzok highlighted a section of the article contending the FBI agents were cautious in their treatment of the Trump case because of “damaging” mistakes in prior probes of Hillary Clinton as well as Trump.

“Really? Name one. I’ll wait,” Strzok wrote in another tweet.

The FBI had investigated Clinton over her use of a private email server while serving as secretary of State.

The Washington Post report details a number of internal Justice Department tensions surrounding the documents case: Some FBI agents thought Trump’s team should be believed in saying they’d turned over all the documents, while prosecutors pressed further investigation. Prosecutors urged the FBI to surprise-search Mar-a-Lago, while two top FBI officials said they should ask the former president’s permission.

The then-head of the FBI’s Washington field office, Steven D’Antuono, was against a surprise search and expressed concerns about the optics of agents descending on a former president’s home, according to the report.

The Post article cites sources who say D’Antuono asked Jay Bratt, head of the counterintelligence division of the Justice Department, if Trump was the subject of a criminal probe — and that Bratt responded, “What does that matter?”

Strzok said The Washington Post article “points to a damning fear in the FBI stemming from political fear, not from fact.”

The former FBI agent was fired from the bureau amid an investigation into Trump’s ties to Russia, after text messages were uncovered between him and former FBI attorney Lisa Page, discussing Trump critically during the 2016 election. Trump mocked Strzok and Page, who were having an extramarital affair, over the texts and their relationship — and knocked the Justice Department over what he saw as a strategy to undercut him.

Strzok sued over his termination, arguing it was politically motivated, and a judge ruled last week that the former president and former FBI Director Christopher Wray can be deposed in his case.

In his Wednesday Twitter thread, Strzok knocked the suggestion that some FBI agents were “simply afraid” that investigating Trump could harm their careers.

“You know what would go a long way to erasing that fear? Leadership that protected agents from political blowback, allowing them to do their job,” he wrote.

thehill
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 07:34 am
In some parts of the world, those who teach and conduct research at a university are exposed to considerable difficulties: For example, because governments suppress unwelcome scientific findings, because they harass researchers or because they monitor very closely what teachers teach their students in seminars.

In 22 countries, the everyday working life of scientists has worsened compared to 2012. This is the result of the new Academic Freedom Index compiled annually by the Universities of Erlangen-Nuremberg and Gothenburg.

The authors of the study paid particular attention to four countries whose development is exceptionally significant: In the USA, the paper states, individual states are increasingly intervening in academic institutions. Nine states, all Republican-ruled, have passed guidelines according to which the teaching of so-called critical race theory is no longer permitted. Conservative lobby groups put pressure on universities to stop funding research fields such as gender studies, environmental and climate protection. In addition, some states allowed lectures and seminars to be recorded or taped - even without the teacher's permission.

"The US case highlights that subnational politics can matter more for academic freedom than federal politics."

Academic freedom deteriorates in 22 countries

Academic Freedom Index – 2023 Update [with link to full text]
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 07:36 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:


When I find a column like that I try to search for the same news story covered by another, more respected, media site – even if the way the material is presented is legitimate or the article raises pertinent questions. Notice how many times the OP resorts to using stories from Murdoch sources. It instantly reduces credibility. Of course, anything the OP posts when she's in trolling mode is already suspect!


When is she not in trolling mode?

Even before she went full-throttle troll...which was long before her trolling during the primary season for the 2020 election...she essentially had nothing to say that was not just trolling.


Here in political commentary, we are all guilty of trolling to some degree. I have no trouble or shame in acknowledging my participation. But with her, it has become not just a primary element, not just a sustaining element...but damn near the ONLY element.

She is a troll...plain an simple. That is all there is to her. Unfortunately, that is all there is to those who attempt to make the American right seem reasonable. They have nothing that works but trolling. They have no agenda but to own people not of the right...and trolling is the only thing they have to use.

It makes more sense to just let her be left alone to just troll herself.
Lash
 
  -3  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 08:26 am
@Walter Hinteler,
You are correct. The US is writhing in the death throes of our final greedy cluster f. It’s bizarre and wrong, and the result will likely be a dystopian balkinization—but probably not before we do untold damage to many other countries.

The Republicans are tearing down the facts about race in America. The consortium of the DNC and spook agencies did the *same thing* around Covid, vaccines, and the CDC’s (formerly independent) assessments—using media suppression of dissenting doctors’ and research scientists’ opinions and funding to force the desired government narrative.

The Biden administration also uses the state media to drum up hatred of China, Russia, Trump and Trump voters, and strikers. They forced the EPA to say East Palestine was safe when everyone knew it was a dangerous, deadly lie.

In short, the US is devolving into an utterly corrupt banana republic from both political parties where the ‘truth’ is sold to the highest bidder.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 08:41 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:
You are correct.
Just for the record:
• I neither wrote the "Academic Freedom Index" nor I'm otherwise related to it,
•I didn't say anything what's in above post nor is that mentioned in my quoted report.


hightor
 
  1  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 08:50 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Even before she went full-throttle troll...

Yeah...it was weird. It was as if a switch got turned and suddenly the cat haikus, permaculture plans, and book discussion disappeared and the fangs came out!
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.WK_qxmJP8IMmTGjAlUOodwHaHa%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=78ff09ade7b7368e00c3d97cf423a649578c19b68b6694022794f787fb8019f6&ipo=images
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 09:10 am
@Lash,
Quote:
The Biden administration also uses the state media to drum up hatred of China, Russia, Trump and Trump voters, and strikers.


There is no official "state media" so you really don't make any sense here. The MSM is supported by advertising revenue, not government subsidies. This results in various media outlets eventually tailoring their news coverage to appeal to particular sets of consumers. There's a market for stories which are critical of Trump – and there should be. And most people who read stories which are critical of Russia or China don't suddenly and automatically start to "hate" those countries. In fact, ever since I can remember, people have gone out of their way to blame the governments of foreign foes and not the civilian populations.

Quote:
In short, the US is devolving into an utterly corrupt banana republic from both political parties where the ‘truth’ is sold to the highest bidder.

How does that work in practice? Is there an auction house for 'truth'? What are you even talking about?
BillW
 
  3  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 09:23 am
@hightor,
The only distillate of Lash's diatribes I see is she is pro Russia and Red China.....
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 09:29 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
There is no official "state media"
Public television?
In the broadest sense, this could be defined as "state media". However, public television and radio programmes in other countries are far more important than those in the US.
hightor
 
  4  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 10:13 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Public television?
In the broadest sense, this could be defined as "state media".


The Corporation for Public Broadcasting does get some funding from the federal government but it would be a mistake to think of it as "state media". The government is more likely to withhold funding than attempt to control content. Several Republican administrations have raised the issue but popular supoport has alway led them to back off.

“A Private Corporation Funded by the American People”

Quote:
CPB is a private, nonprofit corporation created by Congress in the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967.

CPB is the steward of the federal government’s investment in public broadcasting and the largest single source of funding for public radio, television, and related online and mobile services.

CPB’s mission is to ensure universal access to non-commercial, high-quality content and telecommunications services. It does so by distributing more than 70% of its funding to more than 1,500 locally owned public radio and television stations.

CPB by the numbers:

391 radio grantees, representing 1,207 public radio stations
158 television grantees, representing 357 public TV stations
251 of the total 549 radio and TV grantees are considered rural
99% of Americans have access to public media
More than 70% of CPB’s federal funding goes directly to local public media stations
Less than 5% of funding is spent on CPB operations

CPB does not produce programming and does not own, operate or control any public broadcasting stations. Additionally, CPB, PBS, and NPR are independent of each other and of local public television and radio stations.


Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 12:04 pm
@hightor,
Here in Germany, the public television and radio stations are often called "state stations", "state television", "state radio", especially by the extreme right. It is insinuated that they are broadcasting on behalf of politics and government.

Public broadcasting was established after the Second World War as a counter-design to the Nazis' Greater German Broadcasting. The National Socialists had brought the media into line and nationalised and centralised broadcasting - it served as an instrument for Reich Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels.

According to a ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court, state neutrality is a constitutional requirement.

However, according to the case law of the Federal Constitutional Court, this does not mean complete freedom of the state:
"Socially relevant groups" sit on the supervisory bodies that control the broadcasters. These include church representatives, trade unionists, but also representatives of political parties and state governments. State actors, however, are not allowed to have a significant influence in the broadcasting and administrative boards.

In Germany, the financing is also supposed to ensure more independence. In contrast to other countries, the public broadcasters are not financed from the state budget, but through the broadcasting fee that every household in Germany has to pay.
If, on the other hand, broadcasting were financed directly from the state budget, this would open the door to political influence.

State broadcasting means: it is broadcast on behalf of the state. The most restrictive examples of this are North Korea and Cuba.
At the moment, one can clearly speak of state broadcasting again in Poland and Hungary, because they broadcast what the government wants: unpopular leaders have been replaced by the right-wing governments with those who conform to the government.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  3  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 12:39 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
I didn't say anything what's in above post nor is that mentioned in my quoted report.


This is typical of the OP. I doubt she even read the piece by David Wallace-Wells that I posted – in its entirety — for her benefit. If she had, she would have found many points that she could agree with. Instead she attempts to interpret it as propaganda – as if I wrote the article. Her only response to it is:
Quote:
I just want to know how Christopher Wray fits into his articles’ claim.

He wasn't even mentioned in the column. So, after excoriating the FBI as hopelessly corrupt, she now treats Wray's statement about the origins of the pandemic as gospel. Rolling Eyes

Lash
 
  -3  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 01:47 pm
@BillW,
Well, then, the propaganda is working like a charm.
I’ve been here 20 years, but I must be a Russian or a Chinese spy.
JFC.
hightor
 
  1  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 01:51 pm
@Lash,
No one said that, Ms. Reading Comprehension:
Quote:
she is pro Russia and Red China.....

Espionage wasn't even hinted at. Rolling Eyes

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 02:02 pm
@hightor,
Quote:
Quote:
I just want to know how Christopher Wray fits into his articles’ claim.

He wasn't even mentioned in the column. So, after excoriating the FBI as hopelessly corrupt, she now treats Wray's statement about the origins of the pandemic as gospel.

Of course she did.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  2  
Thu 2 Mar, 2023 11:57 pm
@Lash,
I think that some of your old friends just worry about you.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Fri 3 Mar, 2023 07:36 am
We have an important update on the advance of fascism in the world...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqQfhuoWAAAhstU?format=jpg&name=medium
hightor
 
  3  
Fri 3 Mar, 2023 07:54 am
@blatham,
Quel dommage!

I'll remember you in my prayers.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Fri 3 Mar, 2023 08:49 am
@hightor,
Just between the two of us: Bernie had already rolled out the roll welcome mat!
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 3 Mar, 2023 08:55 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Just between the two of us: Bernie had already rolled out the roll welcome mat!


Yeah, Walter. Bernie does have the knack of saying the right thing in exactly the best biting way...on line and in person...as we both know all too well.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.96 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 02:06:29