Lash wrote:Politics is shifting toward something new.
Yes. Mr. Trump is pulling the Reagan Democrats into the Republican Party
I was amazed to read recently that your assessment on this particular item is correct. We'd expected a bunch of new Democrats a la Bernie, but there were a lot of GOP newbies in Iowa.
They are Democrats transitioning. They can't abide Hillary and don't think Bernie can win.
The report covered the recent phenomenon: these new Republican voters were registered Dems who have changed affiliation. There are a high number of Rust Belters that fit this category - hence the media coverage.
There's always two sides to every story.
Quote:Employees Of Group Hired By Florida GOP Admit Fraud
AP | Posted 03.05.2013 | Politics
Read More: Politics News, Florida GOP, Strategic Allied Consultants, Voter Registration, Florida Politics, Gop, Florida Voter Fraud, Voter Fraud, Politics News
Two employees of a company once aligned with the Republican Party of Florida admitted to law-enforcement authorities that they forged voter registration.
All of which had to do with Bill getting some on the side. Republicans with mistresses going after the President for having a mistress.
People who care about a President getting some on the side-or claim they do-have been Republican since the 1990s, and they still aren't nearly enough to elect a President.
Message boards might not be in existence in 2032. Not only is the Republican base-older white people-shrinking in percentage, Trump is driving whatever non-Tea Republicans are left into being Independent and trying to replace them with militia types, KKK adherents, and staunch defenders of bird sanctuary takeovers.
You are guilty of the same thing the GOP was guilty of. They could never specifically point to a statement by Clinton and tell us why it was a lie. Until you meet those specific standards there is no perjury. Waving your hands and yelling "perjury" doesn't make anything perjury.
Perjury requires a statement be unambiguous and factually false then it requires that you show the person making the statement knew it was false. So start by quoting the exact statement you think was perjury. I doubt you will do so since no one has ever done as much. The House couldn't even be specific in it's impeachment trial. People that care about ethics would be specific when they charge that someone committed a crime. But you don't care about ethics or legality it seems.