The Circus in Chicago

It's really scary the way Leftists justify Democrats committing felonies.

Those aren't Democrats the GOP is getting. Those are the guys crawling out of their survivalist bunkers and forest hide-outs to vote for Trump in the primaries.

The Republicans very much pointed out outright lies, both in the civil trial and in front of the grand jury. And I've done so before as well.

I asked you to provide actual evidence to support your allegation and you have not done so.

You're an idiot.

No, you have done no such thing.

Saying you did doesn't make it true.

Witness tampering? Care to provide an example that would hold up in court?

Concealing evidence? What subpoenaed evidence was concealed?

And all this time Bill Clinton's approval ratings were over 60% because nobody is shocked when powerful men have mistresses.

The really yucky thing about Democrats is, a Democratic president could murder a dozen people to cover up an affair, and the only thing that Democrats would ever say about it is "covering up an affair is no big deal".

Republicans have ethics.

As a matter of fact, it is the Republicans who specialize in baseless accusations of murder, starting with the supposedly 20+ "murders" Bill Clinton had committed on the way up, and of course the Vince Foster "scandal". There were accusations thrown around about Foster and Hillary having an affair before the Republicans concentrated on calling Hillary a lesbian full time.

And then you wonder why nobody pays attention when Republicans foam at the mouth and accuse the Clintons.

There is nothing baseless about all the accusations of perjury (both in civil court and before a grand jury), witness tampering, and obstruction of justice that were levied at Bill Clinton.

The gifts that he had given to Lewinsky, which he then sent Betty Currie to remove from Lewinsky's possession.

His coaching of Betty Currie to guide her on how she should testify.

You really should read the evidence.

1. Lewinsky testified that Clinton never specifically told her to hide gifts.
2. Currie testified that Clinton never told her to get gifts from Lewinsky.
3. Clinton testified he never told Currie to get gifts from Lewinsky.

Based on the evidence in the Starr report there is nothing there other than speculation by Lewinsky that she knew what Clinton meant even though he never said anything specific about it.

Once again, you need to read the testimony. Currie stated she felt he was asking to see how she would react not that he was coaching her. The prosecutor's feelings about statements don't create a felony. Not only that, Currie was not on any witness list at the time of Clinton's statements to her. This is complete nonsense to claim it is a felony.

There is everything baseless about the barrage of accusations about the pile of dead bodies Bill Clinton supposedly arranged for on his way up, the accusations of Hillary having Vince Foster killed, the accusations of Hillary having an affair with Vince Foster before the ethics-less conservative haters decided to shift gears and refer to Hillary as a lesbian full time.

According to one of my posts to you 10 years ago:
Lewinsky said that Currie called and said "I understand you have something to give me." Or, "The President said you have something to give me" -- [Something] [a]long those lines.