40
   

I'll Never Vote for Hillary Clinton

 
 
Builder
 
  2  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:25 pm
@snood,
Quote:
Then maybe what will happen is, the Bernie or busts will do whatever bust means (probably go home), and the rest will start supporting the nominee. And we can kick Trumps orange ass.


The only glitch in this plan, is that Sanders is polling well above Trump, while Hillary is level-pegging with the Don.
snood
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:30 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:

Quote:
Then maybe what will happen is, the Bernie or busts will do whatever bust means (probably go home), and the rest will start supporting the nominee. And we can kick Trumps orange ass.


The only glitch in this plan, is that Sanders is polling well above Trump, while Hillary is level-pegging with the Don.


It doesn't matter what Bernie is polling against Trump.
1) Bernie isn't going to be the nominee
2) Bernie has not had to face the excoriation Hillary has had to face
3) Hillary will get a bump from Bernie's eventual concession, whether you admit it or not
ossobuco
 
  0  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:32 pm
@ossobuco,
Far as I know, my ex (Ca) is voting for Clinton, said so earlier, and he is not without political associates. But I forgot to ask him when we talked about a week ago. We went through a lot of political years together and talk easily about it now, every so often.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  2  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:37 pm
@snood,
Quote:
It doesn't matter what Bernie is polling against Trump.


It does to the corporate media, or they wouldn't mention it.

Quote:
1) Bernie isn't going to be the nominee


You don't know that yet. Didn't you view the video I posted?

Quote:
2) Bernie has not had to face the excoriation Hillary has had to face


Because Bernie has no criminal history to hide. Quite simple, really.

Quote:
3) Hillary will get a bump from Bernie's eventual concession, whether you admit it or not


That's an assumption. Only an assumption.
Blickers
 
  0  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:40 pm
@Builder,
It doesn't matter what Bernie is polling against Trump. Bernie is not going to be the nominee.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  0  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:47 pm
@snood,
Quote snood:
Quote:
2) Bernie has not had to face the excoriation Hillary has had to face


Quote Builder:
Quote:
Because Bernie has no criminal history to hide. Quite simple, really.


Neither does Hillary. But the Republicans are openly pulling for Bernie, the National Review has recommended contributing to his campaign and even posting on the internet on his behalf. And when Bernie was marching with Martin Luther King, which was a wonderful and brave thing back then, he was also a member of the Socialist Workers Party and had Trotskyite connections.

The Republicans can't wait to tear into Sanders if he ever got the nomination, which, barring some sort of miracle, won't happen.
parados
 
  2  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:47 pm
@Builder,
Tomorrow morning, Hillary will need less than 20 delegates to get the nomination.

Bernie is not going to win 100% of California or NJ.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:52 pm
@Blickers,
Quote Builder:
Quote:
Because Bernie has no criminal history to hide. Quite simple, really.



Quote Blinkers;
Quote:
Neither does Hillary


Still hiding under that rock, I see.

parados
 
  2  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:54 pm
@Builder,
And your evidence of Hillary's criminal history is what?

I'll bet you have the same evidence of Bernie's criminal history as you have of Hillary's.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:54 pm
@Builder,
^ Content-free posting by Builder. ^
Builder
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 08:59 pm
@Blickers,
Follow the leader. I've posted plenty of evidence already, but you cheerleaders don't pay attention at all, so what's the point?

Shall we go all the way back to her first time in the whitehouse?

Or right up to Libya?
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:03 pm
Go ahead, post your evidence. I'm sure your Russian sources have given you plenty-they can't stand Hillary.
Builder
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:29 pm
@Blickers,
So you can ignore it again?

She wouldn't be "excoriated" if she didn't have all these skeletons in the closet.

Blickers
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:42 pm
@Builder,
So what are you going to do, go on for several pages about, "I have evidence but you can't make me post it"?
Builder
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:45 pm
@Blickers,
It's already been posted.

How's about you present some evidence that she's not guilty of failing to prevent the murder of four Americans at the US consulate in Benghazi?
Blickers
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:49 pm
@Builder,
Unlikely that you already posted evidence. Quite possible that you posted something you claimed was evidence, but wasn't.

She's been cleared of wrongdoing in Benghazi by at least four investigations. That's old news.
Builder
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:53 pm
@Blickers,
Quote:
She's been cleared of wrongdoing in Benghazi by at least four investigations.


Talk is cheap. Post some evidence. Four claims worth.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 09:57 pm
@Builder,
This should make it clear why there's been so many investigations against Hillary. They found nothing.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/12/hillary-clinton/clinton-there-have-been-7-benghazi-probes-so-far/
Republicans in congress is known as the gridlock congress; they waste taxpayer money on useless investigations, and produce the smallest amount of legislation in history. There are important issues facing this country, but they'd rather play politics.

I used to be a registered republican, because I'm a fiscal conservative, but the republican party has changed in so many ways, they're republican in name only. Nobody would be able to recognize the party from what they haven't accomplished in congress for the American people.
Builder
 
  1  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 10:04 pm
@cicerone imposter,
That link also stated that due to the email server issue, there would be a subsequent hearing in October 22nd of 2015. No mention of that outcome.

“Secretary Clinton’s attorney, Mr. David Kendall, late today confirmed she has accepted the Select Committee’s offer to appear before the committee, which will take place Oct. 22nd,” spokesman Jamal Ware said in a statement. “Members of the Committee will question the former Secretary about Libya, Benghazi and her email arrangement consistent with the scope and jurisdiction of the Committee laid out in the House Resolution.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/clinton-will-testify-before-benghazi-panel-on-oct-22-120792#ixzz4AjxxjsyD
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook


cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Sun 5 Jun, 2016 10:08 pm
@Builder,
They've already had seven investigations, and found nothing. The investigations were bipartisan.
Nine investigations? It's become a witch hunt.

This is dated October 2015:
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/10/21/3714507/benghazi-hillary-clinton-terrorism-investigations-congress/
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 06:58:38