Hundreds of Armed Right-Wing Militia Members Take Over Federal Building

Actually, if you had done your homework, you would know that the Hammonds were fined for the amount that it cost to put the fire out.

So, Glitterbag can rest assured that he's not out any cash because of the Hammonds?

The Hammonds paid $200,000 right away and paid the rest Thursday.

Rancher Dwight Hammond Jr. paused while loading cattle one recent day to listen to the fundraising pitch.

Another rancher was selling raffle tickets, raising money for local scholarships while working cattle southeast of town.

Hammond drew out his wallet and pulled out the only currency he had – a $100 bill. He bought five tickets, never asking for change.

Hammond has reached for his wallet a lot in this country. He and his ranch family have supported virtually every charitable activity there is around Harney County. They buy youngsters' animals at 4H sales. They host barbecues. They support the local senior center.

The settlement also required the Hammonds to give the land bureau first chance at buying a particular ranch parcel adjacent to public land if they intended to sell. For some, this was evidence that the government all along was after the Hammond ground to add to its Steens Mountain holdings.

"One thing that upsets cattle people is that provision," said Bob Skinner, a Jordan Valley rancher representing the Oregon Cattlemen's Association. But federal attorneys said the land provision was inserted in case the Hammonds felt they had to sell ranchland to pay the settlement. The Hammonds apparently won't face that prospect because they intend to pay the balance.

glitterbag wrote:

I am incensed that moochers and lowlifes who refuse to pay taxes will set a fire ...

You don't care now if they're "poachers," you just dislike the Hammonds because they are "moochers" and "lowlifes," eh?

On what basis do you assert that they are "moochers?"

On what basis do you assert that they are "lowlifes?"

On what basis do you assert that they "refused to pay taxes?"

So, Glitterbag can rest assured that he's not out any cash because of the Hammonds?

Here is what I read about the fine, and where I read it:

The Hammonds in late 2014 agreed to pay the federal government $400,000 to settle a lawsuit seeking to force them to pay more than a $1 million in costs for fighting fires they set. The Hammonds paid $200,000 right away and paid the rest Thursday.

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2015/12/ranchers_fight_with_feds_spark.html

[/quote)

Glitterbag is a she, mr. knowitall.

I am skeptical that either one of those bums plan to repay

"When you starting bringing in the terrorism act for God-fearing livestock producers in eastern Oregon, something is wrong," said Barry Bushue, a Multnomah County berry farmer and president of the Oregon Farm Bureau.

There's nobody in history who has gone to federal prison for burning a few acres of public property," said Melodi Molt, a Harney County rancher and former president of Oregon CattleWomen. "It's not right."

The Oregon Farm Bureau said the second prison term is "gross government overreach and the public should be outraged."

But at this point only President Obama can spare the Hammonds from serving their full sentence....

Bushue, the farm bureau president, noted Obama earlier this year commuted sentences for drug offenders.

"I hope the president looks as kindly on community members as he does with drug offenders," Bushue said.

The BLM is reputed to have sold off the wild horses for meat and the land for fracking.

Quote:

admit that you are just a blowhard ridiculously telling OTHERS to "get their facts straight?"

Advice you'd do well to take. The fact is they were found guilty and they went to jail. The fact is they've condemned the militia building grab.

Sorry the facts don't fit your personal narrative, but there you have it.

The arson fires lit by the Hammonds in 2001 and 2006 may have actually represented sensible land management, but the Hammonds lost the high ground by their failure to coordinate with the government agency managing the land they burned.

Prescribed fire is a tool used to improve wildlife habitat, increase land productivity, and control wildfire. The 2001 fire aimed at improving productivity, but the government says the ranchers didn’t bother informing the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) they planned to burn until two hours after they lit the fire. While they lit the fire on their own land, it escaped and burned 139 acres of federal land, but that burning probably did not do serious damage to the grassland, and they put the fire out themselves.

The 2006 fire was more questionable. A wildfire was burning on BLM land near the Hammond’s ranch, so to defend their land they lit a backfire on their own land. That would be standard procedure except, again, they didn’t tell anyone....Due to severe fire hazards, the county had a no-burn rule which the Hammonds apparently violated, but this was hardly a terrorist act.

Quote:

Re: blatham (Post 6103190)
Not to be a smartass, but I think layman's reply to your citing the Dept of Homeland Security in which he, in turn, cited the FBI warrants a reply.

I don't take you for a smartass. But the fellow wilted off my radar days ago.