@Olivier5,
I wrote: "How many Americans who were told by the Bush administration that Saddam Hussein was a co-conspirator in the 9/11 attacks, and who considered Arabs in general to be anti-American fanatics of a different (wrong!) religion, were particularly finicky about taking names and kicking ass in the land of the towelheads/sand-niggers?"
Olivier5 responded: "Why does that matter?"
The "golden rule" isn't "He who has the gold makes the rules", it's "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". If everyone followed this simple moral precept, regardless of their religion, would the world be different? Better, or worse?
Might we be having a different conversation today? ISIS began as a branch of al Qaeda in Iraq. The group that eventually became al Qaeda in Iraq piggybacked on popular disaffection with the occupation of Iraq; it began bomb attacks in August 2003, five months after the invasion, and pledged allegiance to the al Qaeda network in October 2004.
Given that al Qaeda would have had no traction without a preexisting insurgency, and that the insurgency could not have gained traction without substantial and persisting popular anger, we can now ask an important question: Why did the Iraqi public turn against their liberators?
When the U.S. military deposed Saddam Hussein, they were greeted with waves and cheers. By May, the insurgency began, slowly at first, most notably in Fallujah. Why Fallujah? Why May, when the invasion began in March and President Bush gave his famous "mission accomplished" speech on May 1?
According to the British newspaper The Independent:
"The Americans' conduct over the Fallujah affair -- and their highly implausible version of events -- has compounded the anger in Iraq over the killings, in which 13 people died after being hit by a hail of US bullets outside a school which the troops were occupying. It combines all the worst elements of the occupation: panicky troops firing at Iraqis instead of seeking to engage with them or understand their circumstances, then insisting that local people have no cause for anger."
http://www.truth-out.org/archive/item/44233-iraqi-rage-grows-after-fallujah-massacre
This was on April 28. Another such incident occurred two days later. Though there would in any case have been isolated incidents arising from malcontented former participants in Saddam Hussein's government, this was the seed for popular disaffection and the insurgency that began as a trickle of attacks in May. The U.S. response, beginning with Operation Peninsula Strike on June 9, was arbitrary mass detentions, home invasions and searches.
Treating the Iraqi people as second class citizens in their own country was a recipe for failure. So was failing to make good in a timely manner on promises to restore basic services like electricity, after infrastructure was targeted and damaged by the invasion forces. Iraq is a very hot place in the summer. Shooting up a bunch of protesters, mass home invasions and detentions, and in general treating the population like enemy aliens in their own country, while allowing them to stew in the heat, was not exactly an exercise in nation building.