@snood,
That's a cheap political shot Snood... Disagreeing with the Hillary Clinton narrative is not the same as "anger against women" and choosing to not support Hillary Clinton does not mean someone is not "ready for a woman president".
You seem to be comparing racism and misogyny again (although last time you wanted to call is "mentioning racism and misogyny in the same post"). Again I will point out that this is not valid at all, there are big differences between how misogyny and racism operate in society.
First of all, there are some gender stereotypes that favor women. You can not make a similar statement about racial stereotypes. Second, racial prejudice continues to be far more prevalent and damaging than gender stereotypes. In almost every field of social justice... salary, incarceration rates, sentencing, housing, voting rights, access to education... you name it, race is a far more important factor than gender. There is no area where White women are not privileged compared to Black men.
But my biggest point is this.
Hillary Clinton supporters want to paint Hillary as disadvantaged and to paint any questioning of the Clinton campaign narrative as misogyny.
Yet when you look at her advantages; political connections, big contributions from Wall Street firms, favorable politically managed access to SNL, defense from congressional leaders, endorsements from Hollywood.... really now. You keep saying Hillary Clinton is "subject to misogyny", yet you have failed to provide a single example where she has been treated any different than male candidates have been treated, nor have you shown any way that her gender is hurting (rather than helping") her campaign.
All you have is cheap shots toward people who dare question the Hillary Clinton narrative.
