izzythepush
 
  5  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 02:37 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Question: Why are you so hung up on black on black violence, and ignore the white on white violence which represents 63%?


For the same reason he largely ignores the huge amount of unreported rapes and wildly exaggerates the tiny incidences of false rape allegations.

He's not interested in anything other than promoting an agenda.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 02:58 am
@izzythepush,
Let see my hang up on black on black violence compare to white on white violence is that according to the CDC homicide is the number one cause of deaths for black young males and it is nowhere near that for either whites or any other group in US society for that matter.

Strange that you know the correct figures for rapes that had not been reported and that those figures are huge.

So huge that one in four or one in five young women are supposed to had been victim of rape during their college years.

Thousands of rapes on every large campus year in and year out and no one hear about such numbers but for surveys that have not a few problems such as defining sexual assault happen when a man attempt to kissed a woman that is not interest and the word here is attempt to kiss the woman not kiss the woman.

Or rape happen when a boyfriend whine enough that his girlfriend give in and have sex with him while she is not in the mood. No force or threat of force used just good old male whining and the surveys call that rape.

Wonder why the numbers are large.
izzythepush
 
  5  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 04:15 am
@BillRM,
It's because you have a sexist and racist agenda. You talk a lot of nonsense, you're not remotely interested in the truth. You can fool yourself if you want to, but don't expect anyone else to pay attention.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 06:59 am

Massachusetts DJ Fined by Cops for Disorderly Conduct After Playing 'F*ck Tha Police' at a Bar
Police feared the song would incite the unruly crowd.
By Michael Arria / AlterNet
March 16, 2016

Print
15 COMMENTS

Eazy-E
Photo Credit: YouTube

A DJ was fined for playing NWA's classic "**** Tha Police" at a bar in Westfield, Massachusetts reports MassLive.

On October 17, Kashawn Harris (who spins under the name DJ Boogy) allegedly put on the song while police were attempting to clear out Shenanigans Pub, in Westfield, Massachusetts, which they say was over capacity.

The MassLive story quotes Officer Juanita Mejias report of the incident.

I believed at that time the combination of alcohol, the excessive amount of people in the bar and the song that the DJ chose to play at that time was an intentional act by the DJ to incite the crowd [that] showed a reckless disregard for public safety.

Harris told MassLive that inciting a riot was never his intent. "I had no intention of inciting a riot," Harris said, "It was just college kids having fun. For them to even think I was trying to start riots was frustrating for me. That's not my kind of background, that's not where I come from."
ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads

Harris contends he only played a snippet of the song and had it cued up before officers even arrived. He also says the pub was cleared out shortly after the cops showed up.

On March 11, Harris was found responsible for disorderly conduct and ordered to pay a $50 fine.

Straight Outta Compton, a biopic on NWA that became the surprise blockbuster of 2015, shows how their concerts frequently ran the risk of being shut down by local police officers.

Michael Arria is an associate editor at AlterNet and the author of Medium Blue: The Politics of MSNBC. Follow @MichaelArria on Twitter.
BillRM
 
  -2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 08:14 am
@BillRM,
Interesting someone had broken out the phony voting accounts.
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 08:19 am
@bobsal u1553115,
I wonder where the ACLU is in this case.
izzythepush
 
  6  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 09:39 am
@BillRM,
Or it could be that a lot of people find your racist and sexist agenda pretty disgusting. Don't cotton wrap yourself thinking just one person thinks you're awful, lots of people do.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 10:31 am
@izzythepush,
True that.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 10:35 am
@BillRM,
Good question, Bill.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  4  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 10:37 am
@MontereyJack,
He's got a unique demographic. Most normal people are put off his sexist and racist attitudes, yet the sexist and racist people are put off voting him up, and may even join in due to what he's said about Donald Trump.

I piss off a lot of people, but I don't try to piss off everyone.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 10:46 am
@izzythepush,
He thinks there's a dedicated group of people with multiple accounts stalking him. As if. He pisses off everybody.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:01 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
He never was one to face up to reality. I imagine a lot of people across the political divide are pissed off with him claiming to be braver than the troops because he's done a few parachute jumps.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:17 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
He thinks there's a dedicated group of people with multiple accounts stalking him. As if. He pisses off everybody.


There been one case of a woman with multiple accounts in the far past voting my posts down so when there are odds voting down patterns my first guess is that someone once more is going through the trouble to block my posts from being seen.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:18 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
him claiming to be braver than the troops because he's done a few parachute jumps.


Guaranteed to offend both sides of the spectrum and every slice in between except self centered millennial extreme sportsters.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:19 pm
@BillRM,
Bill, no one is humanly able to open and close five or more accounts just to screw with your head. What's the point?????????

I mean wouldn't it stick out like a sore thumb to the hamsters: all these accounts that never post but thumb down BillRM like a woodpecker on speed?????
BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:27 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
LOL I am stating that people are willing to place themselves in harm ways for just the fun of doing so not only for high purposes such as in defense of their country.

In any case, there is nothing remarkable in the risking your life for many reasons and risking your life for a noble reason or a minor reason is all the same as far as running risks of death is concern.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:34 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Bill, no one is humanly able to open and close five or more accounts just to screw with your head. What's the point?????????


First the point is to hid postings due to the number of vote downs from anyone who have not change their defaults and second anyone with minor programming skills could have a bot to open any number of accounts and have them do votes downs.
BillRM
 
  0  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 12:38 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_bot

An Internet bot, also known as web robot, WWW robot or simply bot, is a software application that runs automated tasks (scripts) over the Internet. Typically, bots perform tasks that are both simple and structurally repetitive, at a much higher rate than would be possible for a human alone. The largest use of bots is in web spidering, in which an automated script fetches, analyzes and files information from web servers at many times the speed of a human.

Given the exceptional speed with which bots can perform their relatively simple routines, bots may also be implemented where a response speed faster than that of humans is required. Common examples including gaming bots, whereby a player achieves a significant advantage by implementing some repetitive routine with the use of a bot rather than manually, or auction-site robots, where last-minute bid-placing speed may determine who places the winning bid – using a bot to place counterbids affords a significant advantage over bids placed manually.

Bots are routinely used on the internet where the emulation of human activity is required, for example chat bots. A simple question and answer exchange online may appear to be with another person, when in fact it is simply with a bot.

While bots are often used to simply automate a repetitive online interaction, their ability to mimic actual human conversation and avoid detection has resulted in the use of bots as tools of covert manipulation. On the internet today bots are used to artificially alter, disrupt or even silence legitimate online conversations. Bots are sometimes implemented, for example, to overwhelm the discussion of some topic which the bot's creator wishes to silence. The bot may achieve this by drowning out a legitimate conversation with repetitive bot-placed posts which may in some cases appear to be reasonable and relevant, in others simply unrelated or nonsense chatter, or alternatively by overwhelming the target website's server with constant, repetitive, pointless bot-placed posts. These bots play an important role in modifying, confusing and silencing conversations about, and the dissemination of, real information regarding sensitive events around the world.

The success of bots may be largely due to the very real difficulty in identifying the difference between an online interaction with a bot versus a live human. Given that bots are relatively simple to create and implement, they are a very powerful tool with the potential to influence every segment of the World Wide Web.

Efforts by servers hosting websites to counteract bots vary. Servers may choose to outline rules on the behaviour of internet bots by implementing a robots.txt file: this file is simply text stating the rules governing a bot's behaviour on that server. Any bot interacting with (or 'spidering') any server that does not follow these rules should, in theory, be denied access to, or removed from, the affected website. If the only rule implementation by a server is a posted text file with no associated program/software/app, then adhering to those rules is entirely voluntary – in reality there is no way to enforce those rules, or even to ensure that a bot's creator or implementer acknowledges, or even reads, the robots.txt file contents.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 03:02 pm
@BillRM,
It's probably the government. They've been trying to shut you down for a long time. They just can't handle the truth.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 23 Mar, 2016 03:45 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
bot


Seriously Bill, "bot"? Why?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

2016 moving to #1 spot - Discussion by gungasnake
Is 'colored people' offensive? - Question by SMickey
Obama, a Joke - Discussion by coldjoint
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
The ECHR and muslims - Discussion by Arend
Atlanta Race Riot 1906 - Discussion by kobereal24
Quote of the Day - Discussion by Tabludama
The Confederacy was About Slavery - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Black Lives Matter
  3. » Page 94
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 07:58:18