1
   

Edwards lack of experience

 
 
Redheat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:01 pm
timberlandko wrote:
An amusing anecdote re Kerry's website: Earlier this spring, some wonk with time to spare, utilzing the website's own keyword search function, found the site to be liberally seasoned with what most charitably would be termed questionable language ... lotsa good-old-fashioned-anglo-saxonisms, mostly, and many of them from Kerry himself, as quoted by the likes of Rolling Stone, Time, The Washington Post, The Times of London, CNN, ABC/CBS/CNN/FNN/MSNBC/NBC, and others. The "Find" was broadly publicized on the 'net, though not played heavily by Mainstream Media. Kerry's website traffic, and use of the websites' keyword search feature, spiked dramatically as the curious verfied for themselves. Literally hundreds of impolite references would be returned. Today, however, typing the "F Word" into the search box brings up not instances of its occurrance, but only references to such things as the FEC and farming.


There was something like that with Bush and typing in idiot or something to that effect. Actually there were two google searches along the same line. I think that goes for everyone, people have a lot of free time I guess to piss around with the computer.

au-

Thanks for the article. Edwards is not the web behind the ears young un that he's being painted as. That image will quickly evaporate when he hits the campaign trail. Unlike Cheney and Bush he will be talking to all Americans and not just those who paid $2,000 to see him.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:03 pm
Redheat wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
An amusing anecdote re Kerry's website: Earlier this spring, some wonk with time to spare, utilzing the website's own keyword search function, found the site to be liberally seasoned with what most charitably would be termed questionable language ... lotsa good-old-fashioned-anglo-saxonisms, mostly, and many of them from Kerry himself, as quoted by the likes of Rolling Stone, Time, The Washington Post, The Times of London, CNN, ABC/CBS/CNN/FNN/MSNBC/NBC, and others. The "Find" was broadly publicized on the 'net, though not played heavily by Mainstream Media. Kerry's website traffic, and use of the websites' keyword search feature, spiked dramatically as the curious verfied for themselves. Literally hundreds of impolite references would be returned. Today, however, typing the "F Word" into the search box brings up not instances of its occurrance, but only references to such things as the FEC and farming.


There was something like that with Bush and typing in idiot or something to that effect. Actually there were two google searches along the same line. I think that goes for everyone, people have a lot of free time I guess to piss around with the computer.

au-

Thanks for the article. Edwards is not the web behind the ears young un that he's being painted as. That image will quickly evaporate when he hits the campaign trail. Unlike Cheney and Bush he will be talking to all Americans and not just those who paid $2,000 to see him.


there is no admission price to see him and Kerry tomorrow at NCSU....squinney printed free tickets off their web site......
0 Replies
 
Redheat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:05 pm
Hey Bi-Polar! hope you and squinney are doing well.

Kerry/Edwards was just here in FL I was bummed I couldn't go but then again it's about a 110 degree heat index here now. A friend got a pretty good pick of them walking up and Kerry gave her two thumbs up.

I'm pretty excited about this ticket and have been for quite sometime. Edwards will bring a much need zest to the ticket.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:07 pm
Try typing 'french military victories' into google, and hit 'I'm feeling lucky.'

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:08 pm
Are you suggesting that Edwards won't be doing any fund raising?
0 Replies
 
Redheat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:16 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Are you suggesting that Edwards won't be doing any fund raising?


No, why would that even be something that would enter your mind? Of course he will! Rolling Eyes

However unlike Cheney who will only speak to a room full of supporters/contributors and won't allow reporters, Edwards allows EVERYONE to attend and isn't afraid of reporters.

I mean what next? will Cheney be going around in his own little portable bunker?

I think this entire administration has gotten intot he crazy kool-aid. Rummy is losing it, Asscroft has let the crisco drip and coat his last remaining brain cell, and Cheney is clearly teetering on edge of evil turned insanity.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 02:53 pm
See, when you say crap like "Thanks for the article. Edwards is not the web behind the ears young un that he's being painted as. That image will quickly evaporate when he hits the campaign trail. Unlike Cheney and Bush he will be talking to all Americans and not just those who paid $2,000 to see him." you are implying that only Bush and Cheney charge people to meet with them (which they do at fund raisers only). Not like last night's Hollywood $2500 per plate dinner that Kerry attended. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:08 pm
Redheat wrote:
Hey Bi-Polar! hope you and squinney are doing well.

Kerry/Edwards was just here in FL I was bummed I couldn't go but then again it's about a 110 degree heat index here now. A friend got a pretty good pick of them walking up and Kerry gave her two thumbs up.

I'm pretty excited about this ticket and have been for quite sometime. Edwards will bring a much need zest to the ticket.


thank you redheat...we are alive, well, and busy selling crack to middle school kids to raise money for all possible Saddam loving liberal causes :wink: Laughing
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:22 pm
Redheat wrote:
[There was something like that with Bush and typing in idiot or something to that effect. Actually there were two google searches along the same line. I think that goes for everyone, people have a lot of free time I guess to piss around with the computer


Not talkin' about Googlebombs, Redheat ... talkin' about the Kerry website's administrators having taken steps to obscure embarrassing content.

an aside: I was quite entertained by The Left's recent outrage concerning Cheney's purported, and likely real, yet unrecorded, use of a particular anglo-saxonism while there exists extensive documentation, both on tape and in print, of Kerry's frequent use of the word. Yup ... its always worse when the other side does it :wink:

http://cagle.slate.msn.com//news/KerryandEdwards/images/gorrell.gif
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:27 pm
http://cagle.slate.msn.com//news/KerryandEdwards/images/gorrell.gif[/quote]

Takes me back to 1984 :wink:
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:44 pm
No contest.

http://img32.photobucket.com/albums/v97/imposter222/10oped_personality.gif
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:45 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Polls can be as biased as they are structured to be ... and often they are. Recall if you will the recent flap about the LA Times oversampling of Democrats. Consider also the subject, phrasing, and even the order of questions can influence the outcome. The only way to draw meaningful conclusions from polls is to consider as broad a selection of similarly-themed polls as can be made, and to weigh not the individual single-results but rather the trending-over-time; nimh does some very valuable work for us in this regard. And, of course, bear in mind the only presidential preference poll that really counts is the one held on the first Tuesday in November every 4 years.

I agree with all of that (and thanks for the compliment Embarrassed ).

One aside tho, about that LA Times flap. That imho was way overplayed. I mean, not the criticism per se - there might well, in fact, have been something very awry with that individual poll. But the flap about it was made big by a lot of conservative complaints about liberal media like the LAT hyping what in fact was a non-existent Kerry lead. The trippy thing, there, was that in the same week, Gallup also came out with a poll - showing a Kerry lead of the same size. Although I didnt doubt there may have been a problem with the LAT poll, I found the outrage over "flattering numbers" a bit over the top, since an uncontested poll showed exactly the same numbers.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:48 pm
Karzak wrote:
Kerry isn't the devil.
Wait he is.
No, now he's not.

Is there such a thing as a flip flop devil?

<grins>

OK - I hate to admit it -

(cause I think the flip-flop thing's also been greatly overplayed) -

but that was funny.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:50 pm
Karzak wrote:
Redheat wrote:

As a matter of fact I belive there is and what's his name................no wait don't tell me.................it's right there...................oh yeah!

BUSH

I'm against a Homeland Security office..........No I'm for it.

I'm against the 9.11 commission............No I'm for it

I'm against Nation building................No I'm for it

Twisted Evil


Rolling Eyes

None of these are flip flops, just quotes taken out of context, often not even by Bush himself.

Now you know how it feels, eh? Rolling Eyes



(I really should learn to cluster my replies, btw)
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 03:59 pm
nimh wrote:
... (I really should learn to cluster my replies, btw)


Not really.

Well, actually, I guess you should.

But lots of other folks don't.

Most objectionable is chain-posting done by those with whom we disagree.

Then, there's those who were for it before they were against it Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 05:05 pm
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jul, 2004 05:18 pm
Quote:
Kerry and the Democrats to make an unabashed appeal to the millions of Americans whose spiritual beliefs are central to their lives.


Yeah, cuz Kerry's so tight with his church...
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 03:13 pm
http://www.dennistester.com/kerry-edwards.jpg
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jul, 2004 03:27 pm
http://www.internetweekly.org/images/cheney_asimo.jpg

Washington - White House press secretary, Scott McClellan, announced today that President Bush will be replacing Vice President Dick Cheney with ASIMO the robot for the 2004 election campaign."Mr. Rove feels that the current Vice President has been too cranky lately and been bringing everybody else down.  For example: Dick never joins in anymore when we watch Nick at Nite, and he also always turns down the music when we listen to Orin Hatch's Christian Rock CDs.  He won't even dress up like Uncle Fester anymore!

Besides, the President really, really, really, really likes ASIMO.  I think he likes that little dude almost as much as he likes the San Diego Chicken, his dog Barney or even the First Lady for that matter.

Strangely enough, there is no requirement in the Constitution that the Vice President has to be a human being," said McClellan.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Jul, 2004 11:35 am
Mr. Cheney's Troubled Doctor


Published: July 12, 2004
The doctor who regularly vouched for Vice President Dick Cheney's good health had a secret debilitation of his own — a grievous addiction to prescription drugs that has recently been thoroughly aired in public. Unfortunately, we now know a lot about the medical history of Dr. Gary Malakoff but very little about that of his patient, the vice president.

Skimpy, upbeat generalizations have always been offered about Mr. Cheney, who has a history of heart ailments and complex ongoing treatment. In contrast, President Bush, by all accounts a picture of health, has released full details about his own checkups.

In the face of Dr. Malakoff's failings, candor is more urgent than ever from Mr. Cheney. Even as Dr. Malakoff pronounced his patient "up to the task of the most sensitive public office" four years ago, the doctor was spending tens of thousands of dollars on his addiction and making hollow promises of rehabilitation to colleagues.

Dr. Malakoff has been dropped as Mr. Cheney's personal internist. The vice president reportedly has known about the doctor's five-year struggle with addiction but has no concerns about the care he received, according to his press office.

The favorable summaries may have been the best collective judgment of a team of doctors, including cardiologists, but Dr. Malakoff was the lead doctor offering ringing reassurances about Mr. Cheney's health. In retrospect, voters are entitled to question the rosy prognoses. The vice president must put aside his obsession with secrecy and finally offer a detailed report on his medical history. For that matter, so should Senator John Kerry, who has not yet fulfilled promises to release his own records.

Could this be the prelude and the excuse needed for Cheney's being replaced on he republican ticket in 04?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 08:02:32