1
   

Edwards lack of experience

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:27 pm
Okay Cyclop, if I have to prove that that conservatives aren't any more homophobic than liberals, let's see your evidence that they are. You started it. Smile

(Remember that Dick Cheney's daughter is openly gay and no way they have her in the closet.)
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:27 pm
timberlandko wrote:
Comparing time in public service ignores the nature of that public service; Edward's public service experience is entirely legislative, following a private litigational career. The Incumbent's public service has been entirely executive, following an executive career. Apart from a personal staff, Edwards has no experience of administering anything. Both Kerry, having served in military command and as a Lt. Governor, and Cheney, having headed both private sector major firms and cabinet-level governmental departments, have extensive executive experience. Given length of experience, and the nature of that experience, as qualificative parameters, of the four, Cheney by far would be the most qualified.


Wasn't Kerry in Vietnam for only 4 months? Question
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:29 pm
Bush was a ceremonial governor of Texas
Governors of Texas do not have the same powers as governors of other states:

http://texaspolitics.laits.utexas.edu/html/exec/0910.html

The Lieutenant Governor is the most powerful member of the executive branch.

http://texaspolitics.laits.utexas.edu/html/exec/0902.html

Bush handled mostly ceremonial duties and played executive while the real governing was done by others.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:29 pm
au1929 wrote:
Timber
Cheney
as you claim may be the most qualified. However, would a person with his medical history ever be elected to the office of president. He is a heartbeat away from the presidency and also a heartbeat away from the grave.


Cheney might have a history of heart disease, but don't forget that Kerry has a history of cancer. Mad
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:30 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
I think you would also have a hard time proving that statement, fox....

Cycloptichorn


How many liberals in government came out for same-sex marriage? Even Kerry is against it.


As I have mentioned before, I am thinking of running for president.......
here is my stance on same sex marriages......

"Who gives a rats ass about same sex marriage one way or another? Terrorists want to kill gays and straights, cancer and disease kills gays and straights, uneducated unemployed gays are the same drain on society as unemployed and uneducated straights.

In other words, grow up, we have bigger fish to fry. From this day forward we will not speak of it. Marry who you want, f*#k who you want, as long as it's an all adult swim and everyone shut the hell up about it"

btw if marriage is so sacred that only straights are allowed to use the word....let's penalize all the straights who go against God (just like those filthy gays) by getting divorced. In my administration how about a 20% divorce tax, and how about we tax divorced people at a higher rate?
That'll keep folks together.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:31 pm
No, when the reporter was talking about Edwards being pretty, Bush could have owned that reporter by just saying something to that effect. "What, you mean you don't find Cheney sexy?"
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:34 pm
rabel22 wrote:
It certainly does make a differance. Edwards can understand how the "common" man lives and what his everyday problems are while bush has lived with a silver spoon on his mouth from the day he was born. How can royalty understand the problems of the common man. Answer he cant!


Edwards, with his millions and millions, doesn't even know what the word "common man" means. Doesn't he now own three estates? But of course, he's still not in Kerry's league with the $1 billion in dough, he holds with his wife, Heinz-Kerry. Confused
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:37 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Okay Cyclop, if I have to prove that that conservatives aren't any more homophobic than liberals, let's see your evidence that they are. You started it. Smile

(Remember that Dick Cheney's daughter is openly gay and no way they have her in the closet.)


No, he didn't start it.

YOU started it, and I challenged it.

Prove it or admit you can't.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:37 pm
PDiddie wrote:
She's an airhead. Just look at her hairdo.

She wears the same red suit to every meeting, every convening of the Senate. It could get up and go to the Hill without her.

And I'll pay attention to the spelling of the Head Cheerleader's name if you'll pay attention to what's going on in the world once in awhile.


If you want to see something, look at John Edward's hair and then look at his wives. Why the big difference? Doesn't he give the "little lady" enough $$ to get her hair done? Mad
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:38 pm
PDiddie wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Okay Cyclop, if I have to prove that that conservatives aren't any more homophobic than liberals, let's see your evidence that they are. You started it. Smile

(Remember that Dick Cheney's daughter is openly gay and no way they have her in the closet.)


No, he didn't start it.

YOU started it, and I challenged it.

Prove it or admit you can't.


Quit being ignorant.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:39 pm
Miller wrote:
If you want to see something, look at John Edward's hair and then look at his wives? Why the big difference? Doesn't he give the "little lady" enough $$ to get her hair done? Mad


You must be bald... Very Happy
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:40 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Quit being ignorant.


Why don't you let Foxy defend her own self?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:42 pm
I'm not defending her. She can do quite a better job at it than I can. I would just prefer that you stop being ignorant.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:43 pm
Miller wrote:
rabel22 wrote:
It certainly does make a differance. Edwards can understand how the "common" man lives and what his everyday problems are while bush has lived with a silver spoon on his mouth from the day he was born. How can royalty understand the problems of the common man. Answer he cant!


Edwards, with his millions and millions, doesn't even know what the word "common man" means. Doesn't he now own three estates? But of course, he's still not in Kerry's league with the $1 billion in dough, he holds with his wife, Heinz-Kerry. Confused


You conveniently forget the fact that Edwards started out in a regular family with a regular income and worked his way up. Rags to riches. Only in America. Perfect example of the American dream in action. Were you thinking he won the lottery or found a briefcase full of money one day? Or came from money, like georgie? Who better to lead "common men" than someone who has risen up by his own efforts? Isn't that the red white and blue by God America you right wing guys are in love with?

Thought I'd get that in before one of our happy family members gets yet another thread locked up....... :wink:
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:44 pm
Well at this point I'm ready to vote for anybody with a clue and BPB seems as good a candidate as anybody. However, I think being for or against same sex marriages has little to do with homophobia and more do to with practical and equal protection issues that have nothing to do with sexual orientation. At least it does for me.

And Pdiddie, may I suggest a remedial reading class or at least a review of who brought up the whole homosexual thing that has nothing to do with this thread anyway?
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:50 pm
Why foxfyre I'm positively preening to hear you infer that I might just have even a clue......shocked but preening.....
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:50 pm
McGentrix wrote:
I'm not defending her. She can do quite a better job at it than I can. I would just prefer that you stop being ignorant.


Foxfyre wrote:
And Pdiddie, may I suggest a remedial reading class or at least a review of who brought up the whole homosexual thing that has nothing to do with this thread anyway?


When you resort to the ad hominems, you're run out of arguments. Cool
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:51 pm
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:54 pm
PDiddie wrote:
(In case anyone was wondering, this is the same thing as asking Iraq to prove they don't have weapons of mass fantasy. Do you still beat your wife, McG?)



You write this kind of ignorant crap and follow it up with this ignorant crap?


PDiddie wrote:
When you resort to the ad hominems, you're run out of arguments.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:58 pm
countdown to lockdown....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 07:55:44