80
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

 
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 05:59 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Nonsense is the only thing he takes seriously.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 06:05 am
@bobsal u1553115,
What is wrong, and what has the tea party got to do with it?

In very short order you and a whole lot of other people are going to wish that they had taken the Tea Party more seriously....listened more and honestly taken some time to consider what you had been told.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 06:28 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

In very short order you and a whole lot of other people are going to wish that they had taken the Tea Party more seriously.


What a load of bollocks. The tea party is composed of religious idiots, cretins and lickspittles. They're good for a laugh though.

0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  3  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 02:31 pm
@korkamann,
Hey!!! Theres nothing wrong with being 80. I'm enjoying it immensely. And its a hell of a of a lot better than the alternative.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 05:55 pm
@RABEL222,
Every day I get vertical is a good day.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 06:10 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal u1553115 wrote:

Every day I get vertical is a good day.



Yeah, Man. I look for the green side of the grass. Always happy to see it.
0 Replies
 
korkamann
 
  1  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 06:45 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
We are not going to be able to know if the Russians and/or Chinese have her server downloaded. And they are not going to tell us till the exact right time.


In case you're not aware, we must always assume the Russians, Chinese and yes, our so-called ally "Israel" are spying on the US BIGTIME! Double agents in many cases. Spying on other countries has been going on seemingly forever. Yet, you jump on Hillary's server as if you knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Russians, Chinese etc has already hacked her account and made off with vital secrets! You are a piece of work! Remember Jonathan Pollard, Jewish American, turned spy fo Israel? Oh, the conclusions one of your mental calibre pounce on in their hatred for someone they so dislike.

Quote:
I say we just assume that they have it, and will take Hillary down. Hope for the best, plan for the worst.


What definitive proof do you have other than your overly active imagination? You really should try to curb your exaggerated visions.

Quote:
BTW Hillary is getting testy. And she looks like ****. I think she is beginning to understand the score as well.


My, what a picayune small worthless mind you have; descending to the level of referring to a woman's looks. Hillary is under a great deal of intense pressure. I wonder how well you would hold up if you were in your 60s, campaigning through various states, with the GOP propaganda smearing you left and right, with the media thinking they smell a story, pouncing all over; many hosts of TV programs exaggerates the scenario, as if Hillary is about to fall any minute.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 06:55 pm
@korkamann,
Quote:
In case you're not aware, we must always assume the Russians, Chinese and yes, our so-called ally "Israel" are spying on the US BIGTIME! Double agents in many cases. Spying on other countries has been going on seemingly forever. Yet, you jump on Hillary's server as if you knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Russians, Chinese etc has already hacked her account and made off with vital secrets! You are a piece of work! Remember Jonathan Pollard, Jewish American, turned spy fo Israel? Oh, the conclusions one of your mental calibre pounce on in their hatred for someone they so dislike.
Considering the quality of intell our hundreds of billions of dollars buys each year you are a certified Pollyanna.

EDIT: somebody big last week argued that at this point we should give up, kill the CIA, and start something else. The place is hopeless.

Quote:
What definitive proof do you have other than your overly active imagination? You really should try to curb your exaggerated visions.

That was a 4th grade sentence, and yet you could not get it. I never stated facts, much less proof. All liberals are not as stupid as you are they? I would like to have some intelligent people to talk too.
0 Replies
 
korkamann
 
  1  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 07:04 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:

Hey!!! There's nothing wrong with being 80. I'm enjoying it immensely. And its a hell of a of a lot better than the alternative.


Yo, friend. Please, don't take my statement personally, as I was speaking generally, and certainly do not know your physical status. Your posts seem written by someone much younger. My father is 80 and has many health problems; he is beginning to show signs of dementia. There are no signs of advanced aging I sense in you. You are alert and you and your posts are simply fantastic! I enjoy reading what you write and am a great admirer.
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 07:11 pm
@korkamann,
Hear! Hear!
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 11:06 pm
@korkamann,
Thank you, thank you! Did you read her post Hawk and Baldy?
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Wed 19 Aug, 2015 11:18 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

Thank you, thank you! Did you read her post Hawk and Baldy?


gotta link?
0 Replies
 
korkamann
 
  1  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 01:37 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Thank you,....


The pleasure is all mine, Rabel. It is your lack of unsophistication which has made the most indelible impression on me. You are honest in your personal exchanges and tells it exactly the way you see it....in other words, you don't fight underhanded. In many ways you remind me of C.I. who is very outspoken, a quality I also admire. I value honesty more than any other virtue in a poster and disdain artificialness.

Long life, my friend.

P.S. Sorry to go so far astray from the topic of this thread, but hey, none of us is perfect.
korkamann
 
  0  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 02:40 pm
@korkamann,
Rabel, typo!

Wrong:
"It is your lack of unsophistication which has made the most indelible impression on me."

Should read:

It is your lack of sophistication which has made the most indelible impression on me. Your naiveté is so refreshing! Sorry for the typo; this happens when I'm in the office sneaking to post on message forums.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 06:14 pm
@korkamann,
ss ok. Typo is my middle name.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 06:20 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:
I will say that it is disappointing that more Democrats are not running for President. The Democrats had a robust primary slate in 1992 and 2004, but there are a number of decent candidates that are deferring to Clinton. They could spice up the idea debate if they joined in.

They likely understand that their party is doomed to lose the 2016 election due to the effects of the 2013 gun control debacle.

Why fight to win a nomination when the only thing you will be doing is delivering a concession speech?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 07:54 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

engineer wrote:
I will say that it is disappointing that more Democrats are not running for President. The Democrats had a robust primary slate in 1992 and 2004, but there are a number of decent candidates that are deferring to Clinton. They could spice up the idea debate if they joined in.

They likely understand that their party is doomed to lose the 2016 election due to the effects of the 2013 gun control debacle.

Why fight to win a nomination when the only thing you will be doing is delivering a concession speech?

So your argument is that no D's are running not because Hillary got the money men to refuse to fund others, but because smart D's know that they will lose this one? This does not explain why the stupid D's are also mostly not running either.....


I have heard this, but it is a very minority opinion . The story the Hillary smooth talked a room full of stupid people seems much more believable.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 09:00 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
So your argument is that no D's are running not because Hillary got the money men to refuse to fund others, but because smart D's know that they will lose this one?

I didn't really put that much thought into it.

It does seem likely that the Clintons pulled all sorts of dirty tricks to keep competition out of their way. (It also seems possible that the Clintons are using Trump to try to sabotage the Republicans.)

Maybe they learned a thing or two from Mr. Obama's dirty tricks in the 2008 Michigan primary.
ehBeth
 
  1  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 09:03 pm
@oralloy,
(out of context but I didn't want to forget - thanks for the width only suggestion on resizing pix - tried it successfully - still need to preview but it was a good tip)
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Thu 20 Aug, 2015 09:07 pm
@ehBeth,
Can we also get voluntary limits and copy and pasting? so many people waste so much of my time with excessive copying.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The Pro Hillary Thread - Discussion by snood
get this woman out of my view/politics - Discussion by ossobuco
Hillary Clinton hospitalized - Discussion by jcboy
Has Hillary's Time Come? - Discussion by Phoenix32890
I WANT HILLARY TO RUN IN 2012 - Discussion by farmerman
Hillary's The Secretary Of State..It's Official - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Hillary the "JOKESTER"?? - Discussion by woiyo
Hillary Rebuked by Iraqi Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 04:39:08