When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

He does seem, very recently, to have finally listened to his advisers, but that's been thought before. He can't help himself. He'll say many more outrageous things before the election.

I confess some of those numbers goes right out my head, but I quite understand your summary and how easy it will be for Hillary lose this election.

So that is Trump's new campaign strategist? You sure keep up with whose who and why it is important. Gosh, I hope, their sliming Hillary doesn't work. I have a sinking feeling though in the pit of my stomach that it might.

I might check out Breitbart.com just to see what is coming down on Hillary. Why she wanted to do this I have no idea. Really, what is she going to get out of it that she doesn't already have? I don't know why she didn't retire and enjoy her grandbabies in peace. But if she makes it, she will be a good president and I don't regret my vote. I just sort of feel sorry for her in going through all this crap she has been going through for years now.

Why does Hillary do it despite all the sliming and accusations? Partly because all women who advance progressive agendas have to face it, partly because success is the best revenge.

If we haven't already, eventually we will see a claim that Colin Powell advised Clinton to use private e-mail

The following link provides a very effective rebuttal of any attempted claim that Powell essentially endorsed what Clinton did.

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/19/hillary-to-fbi-colin-powell-told-me-to-use-private-e-mail/?utm_source=hadaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

I wonder when Comey said she violated the law? Oh... wait... he didn't say that. He said she was careless and no reasonable prosecutor would attempt to prosecute based on the facts.

Hillary gets foreign policy marching orders from billionaire George Soros as proven by personal emails made public by the hacktivist collective.

https://therealstrategy.com/sorosleak-exposes-funding-revolutions-worldwide/

Agree 100%, that is the role of the DOJ.

Marching orders? LOL

Good grasp of a term I used, CI. Don't let anyone criticize your reading comprehension.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/14/wikileaks-e-mails-reveal-clinton-taking-marching-orders-george-soros/

http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/bombshell-hillary-leaked-email-shows-billionaire-george-soros-gave-foreign-policy-orders/

Again. Hillary selling influence to billionaires.

Well, she and Bill had to do something to amass a fortune of over $100 million

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/26/exclusive-bernie-sanders-blasts-billionaires-but-has-unreported-ties-to-soros/

http://www.infowars.com/bernie-sanders-gets-endorsement-from-soros-moveon/

http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/bernie-sanders-backed-by-nazi-collaborator-george-soros/


using those lovely right-wing sources sometimes backfires

LOL

Notwithstanding Lash's misguided support for Sanders, the link you provided doesn't in anyway mitigate the one that attacked Clinton.

It's Breitbart for crissakes.
Breitbart is rightwing propaganda.
I think ehBeth's post highlights the random nature of Breitbart's attacks on democrats. Lash wasn't citing Breitbart when her "democrat" was still running.
The only people who take Breitbart's "journalism" seriously and give their "reporting" any credence aren't interested in whether the smears are true or not, they're just interested in the smears.

It's brilliant when that sort of thing happens.

I'll keep that in mind when you offer up one of your leftwing propaganda sites, for crissakes, as authoratative

How many of those left-wing sites are actually run by and paid for by Soros?

Well, we know Media Matters is.