When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Hillary knew she was violating State Department guidelines. She also knew she was very likely exposing top secret emails to foreign government hackers.

nd she has not only lied repeatedly, she has lied incessantly. Every single statement that she has made regarding the matter has been a lie.

So you're reposting an article that is 2 weeks old. No new information is to be gained in that article. I suppose you simply plan to keep up the constant thread of negative posts about Hillary, even when the media doesn't cooperate by finding new scandals. You'll just keep on repeating stuff to keep it from aging.

Is your point the similarity of the points made in the two speeches? OK. So what? The permissable breadth of the speeches of the spouses of candidates isn't very broad, and it would be interesting to see a larger sample of such works to detect the prevailing norms for such things.

Is this important to you?

This is yet another example of the Trump's camp dishonesty.

The brighter ones (like Kagan) have already publicly stated that their vote will be going to Clinton this cycle. But boy are they rare.

She thought she was following State Department guidelines, which only said that Emails must be recorded. Hillary correctly figured that since the government Email accounts automatically copies all incoming Email, that by sending work related Emails to a staffer on the State Deprtment that a copy was automaticaly made by the Email system. She felt this fulfilled the rules.

Simply not true at all. A person can be mistaken, that does not mean they told a lie.

maporsche wrote:

So you're reposting an article that is 2 weeks old. No new information is to be gained in that article. I suppose you simply plan to keep up the constant thread of negative posts about Hillary, even when the media doesn't cooperate by finding new scandals. You'll just keep on repeating stuff to keep it from aging.

Liberals come up with all sorts of excuses to justify their wrongdoing. The idea that their wrongdoing only matters if it happened within the past 30 seconds is one of their more goofy excuses.

She thought she was following State Department guidelines, which only said that Emails must be recorded. Hillary correctly figured that since the government Email accounts automatically copies all incoming Email, that by sending work related Emails to a staffer on the State Deprtment that a copy was automaticaly made by the Email system. She felt this fulfilled the rules.

Hillary went out of her way to make sure that the State Department never had an opportunity to tell her whether her server would violate the rules. This shows that she knew that they would tell her that her server was against the rules.

Donald Trump completed his takeover of the GOP last night, officially securing the nomination — on an evening, fittingly enough, that was ostensibly about the economy but devolved at times into angry chants about throwing Hillary Clinton in prison.

Such talk is common among Republicans and GOP-aligned media elites, of course. Much of the time it’s mainly about supplying care and feeding to a GOP base. But this time, the chants of “lock her up” hinted at something more. Tellingly, they came amid increasing signs that Republicans think they are going to lose this election, which suggests that this might also represent an effort — perhaps only intended at this point in the dimmest of ways — to delegitimize Clinton’s presidency in advance, should she win.

"Even if a third candidacy still yielded a Clinton Victory, it would be worthwhile. It would, first, deny the Clinton Campaign the illusion of a mandate from American voters who would have, en masse, turned out to reject Trump"

Both Clintons have indeed surrounded themselves with a retinue of personal assistants, many in the employ of their foundation, who insulate them from the details and annoyances or real life.

Blickers' defense of Hillary's actions doesn't get any more believable with the constant repetition.

Government secure e mail systems

are monitored and have substantial defenses from hackers.

Hacking is difficult but possible,

but intrusions can be detected and in many cases shut off.

Hillary's server had no such protection and no monitoring.

Hacking into it would be a relatively simple chore and would leave no detectable traces.

Several hackers already have claimed to have done the job, and the prident assumption in the intelligence services is that it was hacked repeatedly.

Blicker's claim that no hacks occurred is pure deception.