When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Quote Lash:

Quote:

Here's a news story. Looks pretty bad.

http://observer.com/2016/06/the-coming-constitutional-crisis-over-hillary-clintons-emailgate/

The author of that article is John R. Schindler, a conservative writer who has published articles in The National Review. He used to teach at the Naval War College but got into trouble for sending dick pics over the internet.

Same great sources as always, from you.

It's not surprising that he wrote an article saying Hillary should be indicted.

Quote:

I believe that both Sanders and Trump have tapped into a deep and widespread frustration with the economic sclerosis attending the increasingly bureaucratic and intrusive state that is evolving here.

You've said that previously. It does seem to be the case that declining opportunities and economic standards for many are a significant causal factor in citizen unhappiness/dissatisfaction. However, your final half of the sentence is merely an assertion of how this has happened based upon an ideological stance you've adopted. You ought not to pretend that this economic analysis has broad acceptance because it doesn't.

Re: Blickers (Post 6205813)
thanks, but when entering somebody´s home i always ask for permission...
anyway thanks a lot for welcoming my opinion about this

You have long and repeatedly accused me of that "equivalence bit" It's true that in the case at hand I asserted that certain excessive behaviors can be found across the political spectrum, but that doesn't mean either that they, or the consequences of them, are the same or equivalent. It is merely an observation of human nature and its expression in large groups of people. It's also true.

President Barack Obama “is a special kind of stupid,” former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin wrote Friday.

One conservative who did not abandon Palin was Matthew Continetti, who wrote for The Weekly Standard, the editor of which, his father-in-law William Kristol, helped bring Palin to the attention of Washington Republicans. Now the editor of the Washington Free Beacon, Continetti continues to nurse grievances against Palin’s critics within the party. As recently as last summer, Continetti accused the McCain staffers who denounced Palin for their “back-stabbing vindictiveness and self-seeking,” for being small enough to curry favor with “the liberal press” by “leak[ing] disparaging material about their vice presidential candidate even before Election Day.”

The rise of Trump has given many Republicans, including Continetti, a different perspective on these very same questions. Trump’s candidacy has given them the chance to debate the merits of an ignorant demagogue, rather than defend him reflexively. Many of them have decided that a president who knows things about public policy, and does not indulge conspiracy theories from email chains, has a certain charm. They have even come to view the dissent against such a candidate as an act of nobility, rather than traitorous currying of favor with the elite liberal media. And they have even begun questioning what pathologies have driven Republican voters into the arms of such patently unqualified demagogues. Continetti has a column today making the point in admirably clear terms:

<i>It’s a joke. All of it: his candidacy, the apparatus of propaganda and grift surrounding it, the failures of governance and education and culture that have brought us to this place. What disturbs me most is the prospect that Donald Trump is what a very large number of Republican voters want: not a wonk, not an orator, not a statesman, not even a leader, really, if by leader you mean someone who persuades and inspires and manages a team to pursue a common good. They just want a man who vents their anger at targets above and below their status.</i>

These are important questions — what failures of education and culture could have left Republican voters predisposed to the propaganda of a grifter who is neither a wonk nor an orator, and who exploits their cultural resentments? Continetti does not provide any answers. Here is one:
(followed by an image of Continetti's book "The Persecution of Sarah Palin"

RUSH LIMBAUGH (HOST): I just want you to hear a couple of the things Obama said at the memorial. At the memorial, after meeting with survivors of the terror attacks.

[BEGIN AUDIO]

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: Given the fact that the last two terrorist attacks on our soil, Orlando and San Bernardino, were home grown. Carried out, it appears, not by external plotters, not by vast networks, or sophisticated cells. But by deranged individuals warped by the hateful propaganda that they had seen over the internet. Now we're going to have to do more to prevent these kinds of events from occurring.

[END AUDIO]

LIMBAUGH: Uh oh, you hear that? It's the internet's fault. Yeah, all this hatred on the internet, yeah. Was all that propaganda on the internet. We're going to have to do more to prevent these kinds -- Can you say the words "net neutrality"? If you can, then you might be aware of how Obama intends to take control of the internet, using this as justification, which sadly many low-information Americans and propagandized Americans themselves will applaud. But it will not be, Obama's takeover of the internet will not be to prevent these kinds of things from happening. He's got an entirely different agenda. All the Democrats do. It's total control. It's limiting access to information. It's about shutting down opposition. That's why they want control of the internet.

Yesterday, Donald Trump ally Alex Jones chatted with fellow conspiracy theorist Steve Pieczenik, who told the InfoWars broadcaster that government agencies and the Muslim Brotherhood are blackmailing President Obama and Hillary Clinton over their secret gay pasts.

Perhaps the main differences between you and Linbaugh are your respective points of view and the remarkable commercial succerss he has somehow achieved. I find it remarkable that one of your insight would fail to see these parallels.

That said, I don't see much difference between many of your posts here and the Linbaugh stuff you've quoted.

Don't see much difference between what Rush Limbaugh says and what blatham says?