When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Pseudo liberal.

Hillary does not say it cannot be done, she just says it will take time. She doesn't lie and give out fallacies like fantasy revolutions which are going to bring it about. I don't know, I haven't seen much of a revolution of which Bernie speaks of, not sure I would even want one. I don't want his wife sitting in the white house, spooky.

THAT'S IT! The perfect name for you and your ilk.
Pseudo-liberal.

Thanks.

What's wrong with Jane Sanders? Not polished enough for you?

I see who you are.

This is exactly why I will never give her a vote, no matter what. This and her Cheney military attitude.

She could do with a makeover, but that is not it. One day I watched her on MSNBC, I got the creeps listening to her talk about transforming America. Anytime anyone gets that sweeping, it just makes me uncomfortable.

Here it is. Perhaps she don't bother anyone else, but I just don't like feeling forced to change by being "transformed."

Glad I could help you out. Guess I can look forward to being called something I took the trouble to look on google for synonyms for fake.

Why is it bad when democracies make a stand against the bad guys?

I have been scolded by Lash, me, the one who gave her room, telling others that she is sincere. If I don't stop posting on her, who, me?, she will tell the mods I am harassing her.

I still take her as sincere, but I'm done.

I take her as sincere as well, sincerely warped. It is like she has taken the progressive label and twisted it out of all recognition.

It seems to fit.
I don't believe a person who supports Hillary is an authentic liberal or an authentic progressive.
I think if you read others - who don't have an ax to grind - you'll see they agree.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/walker-bragman/hillary-clinton-is-no-pro_b_9204690.html

http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2016/02/25/hillary-clinton-is-not-the-progressive-she-claims-to-be.html

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29052-five-reasons-no-progressive-should-support-hillary-clinton

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-02-05/is-hillary-clinton-a-progressive-depends-on-whos-asking

Here is a quantified comparison between HRC and Bernie:

(excerpt)
Twitter chatter aside, when it comes to judging who’s more progressive than who, political scientists have an app for that—at least for those who’ve served in Congress, as Sanders and Clinton both have. It’s the DW-Nominate first dimension, scaled from +1 to -1, which explains the lion’s share of how members vote. [Explanation|Data]. For the two years when they served in the Senate together, Sanders had a score of -.717, making him far and away the most liberal member. Number two, Sheldon Whitehouse had a score of -.507, while number 15, Hillary Clinton had a score of -.403. The difference between Sanders’ score and Clinton’s was greater than the difference between Clinton and Evan Bayh, the second-most conservative member of the Democratic caucus at the time. So in short, the difference between them in terms of who is most progressive is both objective and huge.

http://www.salon.com/2016/02/09/hillary_clintons_progressive_problem_the_real_policy_differences_between_her_and_bernie_sanders_can_actually_be_quantified/

The millions of people supporting Hillary are all fake liberals, fake progressives, corrupt, or stupid. She has spoken. Thus let it be written.

we will keep talking, I hope

Jo

Snort.

Oh, I'm sure after this election is over with no cataclysm - no paradigm changing Bernie miracle, no big reveal of Hillary as the Devil in drag - Lash will be back to talking like nothing ever happened. Like she didn't show her ass for a solid election season. Like she didn't insult the intelligence and call into question the morality of anyone who didn't fall in line with her warped ideas of correct politics. She has to act like the last several months didn't happen, because the alternative is to own her crazy assed paranoid nastiness and find a way to validate it. There ain't any.

Any of this being true (I get it), I met her and we hugged. I was sort of afraid of her and we ended up liking each other, or so I took it, who can guess. It is probably from that meeting that we don't just hate each other.

We differ a great deal.

You aren't qualified to say whether or not we ended up liking one another, or that we don't hate one another.

Although you make noise in an attempt to speak for me quite often, you do not do so accurately.

I think it's rude to give personal information out to the public about a private meeting.

You are grossly guilty of doing this to me ad nauseum, although I've asked you nicely and privately to keep my personal business off the public venue.

You have broken confidence several times, blabbed that you've ignored me, but yet continue to blab about me based on a personal meeting.

You aren't who I thought you were; I have no use for someone who has as little care for discretion as you do. I didn't want to splay this out in public so I asked you several times by PM to leave me to my privacy.

You rejected that. So, now in public if you must have it so, we aren't friends; I misjudged who you were, I wish I'd never met you because you abused my trust.

Can you find something else to talk about besides me? You don't know me.

I meant re talking with revellete.

Ohh... I thought you meant we'll all be talking like buddies. Gotcha.

Yeah, you've told me a half dozen times that you've met Lash and like her. Usually you tell me that right after I write my opinion of the persona she depicts here on A2K. I got it, Osso. Like her all you want, it's certainly your privilege.