When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

Thanks. That's what I thought. If you agree with the criticism, no matter how nasty it is - it's ok. Mine, however... Nodding.

Exactly my experience at A2K.

You'll find out soon that if they agree with your digression, it is ok.

Ask someone about the ignore feature.

It was both, remember it well, sickened me.

Matter of opinion, I guess. But people can judge them (and you) as to whether they are racist by their constant justification of racist acts from police brutality to voter suppression to Trump's dog whistles.

Like when you say you approve of Nazi propaganda posters while teaching kids about the Holocaust?

AND BillRW, and nononono, and giuJohn.

I wasn't aware that there was more than one poster who advertised he liked sex with youngsters on here. I never did get around to reading the Wanted To Be Raped thread. I saw some posts from Hawkeye years ago where he was getting into all the rights people who have sex with youngsters have and, as snood said, parsing his words around the subject, so I thought he meant Hawkeye. Who would guess there was more than one who would actually admit it?

Yeah man, it really got creepy. There was this passionate defense of men who choose to have sex with underage girls. Even to the point of long convoluted arguments about consent.

just ask some of us who participated in the first part of the rape thread..

She's right, several women and one man talked about assaults or near assaults. And at the risk of Lash having a conniption, Bill was one of the worst as to insulting and excusing the complaints of sexual assault survivors claiming the victims were inventing situations just to make men look bad. Let me correct that, Hawkeye was worse because, well, he was just worse. I don't think there were dozens of underage sex enthusiasts, just enough to sicken other people's sensibilities.

amen to that!

It was sort of like being re raped, there are no right words. One of us, a dear person still here, was raped by several, at age four. My stuff wasn't that horrible, a matter of physical power. Anyway, that was a **** thread of all time.

I missed what Lash had to say on that, since I'm been ignoring her - what was that about?

Lash was scolding GB for making a sardonic joke about Billrm and 11 year olds. She tried to equate that as the same thing as her calling people drunks. I pointed out that the difference is that there's reason to connect Billrm with pedophilia.

I second that!

Getting way off topic, but I can see that. If you teach something, you would have to teach the negative ugly parts as well as the more positive. The same as if you had a course on civil rights, you would include the KKK pictures of night hanging and burnings as well as pictures of MLK and other heroic civil rights leaders and events. Or teaching of west in the US, you would have to include the trail of tears and destruction of Indian way of life as well the white settlers. (Hard to find something positive there)

Lash was implying people were stupid based on typos they had made. That's why I reminded her of an episode about six months ago.

She butted in on a conversation between Osso and myself about acceptable imagery. I posted something I thought was not acceptable, a Nazi propaganda poster depicting a demonic Jew, complete with tusks and horns, controlling Stalin. Lash said she approved of the poster because it showed Jews controlling Stalin.

Later on she asked if Jews really were controlling Stalinist Russia, clearly showing she understood nothing of the nature of Nazi propaganda.

And this from someone who is teaching kids about the Holocaust. I think that's far more disturbing than a couple of typos.

My bad, izzythepush, I should learn to butt out myself. I agree it is troubling.