80
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 07:02 am
For the most part, I like Michael Gerson. He might be coming from a quite different place than me but at least it is from the same frigging planet.

Quote:
The arrival of Sarah Palin brings a special something to the 2016 campaign, like a little LSD added to the punch bowl. Are we watching C-SPAN, or a reality TV show, or a “Saturday Night Live” skit? It is impossible to tell without consulting the channel guide.

Ted Cruz may have secured the coveted “Duck Dynasty” blessing. But Palin is the original and best representative of Kardashian conservatism. Her endorsement of Donald Trump was entirely devoid of policy content — a speech that did not even aspire to shallowness. It is enough that Trump is “going rogue” and “ticking people off” and “media heads are spinning.”


Quote:
The danger of an anti-intellectual politics is that it quickly becomes unmoored from real problems and real answers. In U.S. history, anti-intellectual populism has often become conspiratorial, focusing anger against powerful and imaginary enemies: the Masons, the international bankers, the Jesuits, the munitions-makers. “How can we account for our present situation,” asked Sen. Joe McCarthy (R-Wis.) in 1951, “unless we believe that men high in this government are concerting to deliver us to disaster? This must be the product of a great conspiracy, a conspiracy on a scale so immense as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man.”
http://wapo.st/20iPXUS

Slipping on our Sherlock hats, what we can deduce from that last graph is that Michael has surely read Hofstadter's Anti-Intellectualism in American Life (and you should too).
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 07:12 am
Holy mackerel Andy
Quote:
The Republican National Committee has ended a debate partnership with National Review after the venerable conservative magazine devoted its new issue to a "symposium" of reasons why voters should reject Donald Trump's presidential campaign.
http://wapo.st/20iR1bu

OK, everybody. Let's all form a big round circle. Now, raise your AK47s..."
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 07:24 am
And finally, before I turn my blog over to others, you do NOT want to miss Stephen Colbert on Palin's speech. You really do not.
http://wapo.st/20iSkqH
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 07:50 am
Oh heck. One lastest thing...

Quote:
Maggie Haberman ✔ @maggieNYT
Trump deprived Cruz of needed oxygen yesterday and again into today. Now 12 days out from the caucuses.

Nobody - by which I mean NOBODY - plays this game better than Trump.

It's what Cruz tried to do from day one; push his name and his face out in front of others with outrageous statements and behaviors, to become despised, to gain loud protests, to be the center of attention. Everything he's done since he gained his Senate seat (and before, actually) was to this end. Fill up the media space with CRUZ!

And he doesn't know WTF to do because Trump has got the klieg lights and the cameras and the reporters eagerly, joyfully gathered together as he sits right on top of Cruz's face.

He's a master. And who'd have imagined that there's a comparison to be made between Donald Trump and Michelangelo.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 01:29 pm
http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/3100/2823/original.jpg

Since I have time to edit, why would anyone deny she made up that story? It is a fact, and her excuse is as lame as her others when caught in a lie.

Just saying, and why anyone would support a thouroughly dishonest person for this countrys highest office is unbelevable in itself.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 01:40 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Here's a lady that scares the hell out of me.
Quote:
Liz Cheney, the daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, will announce a bid for Wyoming's only House seat, Morning Consult is reporting.
http://bit.ly/1PlXS1V
She is as bad as her father, which is saying something. Modern sorta-democratic states have a lot of barriers to prevent those who, in other circumstances, would easily fall to a serious fascism from doing so. But the personality type remains present and dangerous nonetheless. And Dick's tenure demonstrates that rather clearly.

I had a google news alert on Liz for a long time. When her earlier attempt to gain a senate seat turned into the explosive mess it became and she dropped out of that race and effectively dropped out of sight, I closed off that google alert. Several months ago, I got wind of this new move and set up a new alert.

She's smart, savvy, very quick on her feet and very smooth. Those are good characteristics in a normal or good-hearted person. But she's not those things. She's an authoritarian personality in spades, like her father. And she's very ambitious. She has been working as a partner in at least two of Bill Kristol's neoconservative operations (as her father was a key player in the Project for a new American Century). Dangerous lady. I don't use the term 'evil' often but I put this label on her.


Interesting take. I think the Fascism & evil parts are rather over done ( a bit reminiscent of the moralistic judgments of the Bible thumpers you claim to despise, don't you think?), but otherwise accurate. Authoritarian systems come im many forms across the political spectrum. 20th century Fascism and Soviet Socialism ended up behaving very similalrly and in equally authoritarian and even tyrannical ways. Would you credit Bernie Sanders with any authoritarian inclinations?
cicerone imposter
 
  4  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 01:59 pm
@georgeob1,
Anyone who thinks Sanders is tyrannical will have great imagination.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 02:01 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Anyone who thinks Sanders is tyrannical will have great imagination.


When people are taxed at 90% they might change their minds.
georgeob1
 
  0  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 02:17 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Anyone who thinks Sanders is tyrannical will have great imagination.


Have you listened to his rhetoric about Wall Street? I suspect that if you were a Financial Manager there you would see him as an authitarian figure.
snood
 
  4  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 02:39 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
Anyone who thinks Sanders is tyrannical will have great imagination.


When people are taxed at 90% they might change their minds.

Please, please show something besides rightwing screeds supporting the suggestion that Bernie would tax someone at 90%.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 02:40 pm
@snood,
cj has cold joint imagination that can't survive in normal climates.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  4  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 02:41 pm
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

Anyone who thinks Sanders is tyrannical will have great imagination.


Have you listened to his rhetoric about Wall Street? I suspect that if you were a Financial Manager there you would see him as an authitarian figure.

Yeah Bernie is adamant that the biggest American economic disaster since the great depression was caused by recklessness and greed on Wall Street. Wow, how dare he spread such baseless propaganda, huh?
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 02:47 pm
@snood,
Quote:
how dare he spread such baseless propaganda,


The baseless propaganda is that Socialism is some sort of answer.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 03:33 pm
@snood,
Yup; too big to fail.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 04:06 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Anyone who thinks Sanders is tyrannical ....


Most investors are now starting to think that Sanders knows little to nothing about economics. See the WSJ for today.

In the WSj for today, we learn what is wrong with Sander's latest idea about "a free college education " for students. Sanders is now proposing a tax of 50 cents on all stock trades having a value of $100 or more, to fund this "free college education".

Don't forget the idea of taxing capital gains at the earned income level, and not the lower interest level now in operation.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 04:21 pm
@Miller,
Sanders' "free college education" is a pipe dream with no hope of realization. Most people, I would think, took it with a grain of salt. His other talk about taxing 50c on stock trades of $100 or more will never come about. What legislator is going to push that kind of law or support it? That would be hara kiri.
georgeob1
 
  0  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 05:41 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

Yeah Bernie is adamant that the biggest American economic disaster since the great depression was caused by recklessness and greed on Wall Street. Wow, how dare he spread such baseless propaganda, huh?

He can say anything he wants as far as I am concerned It is noteworthy however, that based on his campaign rhetoric, he intends (if in the unlikely events (1) that he is elected, and (2) gets his way in Congress ) to behave in a very authoritarian way with respect to financial markets, investors and others.

You of course suscribe to the fiction that Wall Street alone caused the 2007/8 market crash, implying that the chief bundlers and sellers of mortgage securities, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac, and the Federal mandates about red lines and qualifying people for mortgages at amounts that violated long standing measures for acceptable levels of repayment ability, all had nothing to do with it. That flys in the face of common sense and serious economic analysis done since then.

The sad thing is that we're doing it all again this time with Federally guaranteed College loans which have already spiked a wave of reckless spending in colleges across the country and the exploding tuition rates that follow. Such Federal subsidies usually have the opposite of the intended effect as they pump cheap money into markets, lowering price competition and raising demand at the same moment yielding the inevitable economic bubble.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 06:01 pm
@georgeob1,
Here are the 'facts' about corporate America. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-the-stock-market-destroyed-the-middle-class-2015-04-24
georgeob1
 
  0  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 06:14 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You say "facts" : the piece is correctly identified as "opinion" and after a quick scan if find in to be that and from a very one sidfed viewpoint as well.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Fri 22 Jan, 2016 06:21 pm
@georgeob1,
They are 'facts' until you can prove otherwise. I believe that article even if you don't. It's a belief or judgement. I believe it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The Pro Hillary Thread - Discussion by snood
get this woman out of my view/politics - Discussion by ossobuco
Hillary Clinton hospitalized - Discussion by jcboy
Has Hillary's Time Come? - Discussion by Phoenix32890
I WANT HILLARY TO RUN IN 2012 - Discussion by farmerman
Hillary's The Secretary Of State..It's Official - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Hillary the "JOKESTER"?? - Discussion by woiyo
Hillary Rebuked by Iraqi Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.15 seconds on 11/18/2024 at 04:31:50