@engineer,
I dont find it but I imagine anchors are like presidents, once they are out of the chair they try very hard to not be critical of how the next guys do their job.
About 4-5 years ago there was a lot of talk in America about storytelling, there still is but that is when I first noticed it...stuff like this:
Quote:Recent psychological research revealed how people want to inhabit storyworlds because of how stories work in the brain. We actually always project ourselves into all sorts of storyworlds (books, films and beyond) in order to understand them. So it follows that the greater the ability of an audience to project into a world, the greater their understanding and attachment to it.
http://www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/2014/nov/17/-sp-storytelling-digital-film-4
The thing that gets totally not understood about williams is that his storytelling was not about ego, it was not about pumping himself up or putting others down, I am almost positive that he thought that he was doing what was asked of him and that it was not at odds with how he viewed his job as a journalist.
He was going with the flow on our new emphasis on storytelling in this culture, and he I bet believed that by sifting his reporting through telling stories he was making the news of the day accessible to this collective that increasingly does not read, does not think much of facts (look at the steep decline in the reputation of science!) and which gets its information visual stories (hollywood, Madison ave,youtube). I am really sure that he thought he was doing good work, that he was helping people to understand the world around us. Look at how long we have sucked up hokey political commercials just for an example, which tend to tell very emotionalized stories that have very little connection to reality. We love that ****, the politicians dont get hardly any pushback on that. And it works. So if he could take what he is seeing and report it back in a more personal and emotional way than journalists have tended to work where was the harm, I am sure he said to himself. So he had to make up a few details so that he could report in the first person, so he had to pump up the emotional content so that people would listen, so what....the ends justify the means. That is what the elite of this collective keep saying, did we not think that they actually mean it?