@revelette2,
Quote:It is also important to note that some detainees who were subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques attempted to provide false or misleading information about the facilitator/courier. These attempts to falsify the facilitator/courier’s role were alerting. In the end, no detainee in CIA custody revealed the facilitator/courier’s full true name or specific whereabouts. This information was discovered through other intelligence means. “2
Abosuletly laughable. To say waterboarding revealed them trying to lie about the couriers role didnt lead to putting the spot light on him is to ignore the obvious: the technique worked like a ******* charm.
You all think that this program is a bunch of brainless toughs in a dark room with a bright light and a rubber hose.
This is a sophisticated protocol designed with the notion that yes, they may lie...to the ones doing the waterboarding. But to the operatives not dishing it out? You know...good cop bad cop? As any one who has been through training regarding interogation at the hands of the enemy (all military personnel) the first thing they tell you is not to lie or mke things up. A good interogator can mine lots of good info from your lie. Thats why your told: Name, Rank, and Service # only.
Wake up sheeple.