@hawkeye10,
You omitted the fact that the first sentence of that article states that the letter of outrage to CNN was written by Martin Singer, Cosby's lawyer.
I didn't think you were dumb enough, or gullible enough, to fall for that desperate PR ploy by Cosby's attorney to blame the media for Cosby's alleged "victimization" at their hands---it's Cosby's victim narrative he doesn't want challenged.
He wants everyone, of course, to believe these accusers are all lying, and he's clearly trying to bully the media out of giving them airtime to talk about their experiences with Cosby. The media would love to have Cosby present his side of the story, but this same lawyer refuses to let Cosby speak--then he complains that the coverage is "unbalanced".
It's the newest party line from the Cosby camp--i.e. the media hasn't properly "vetted" his accusers, so all these women
might well be lying, and Cosby is the real victim
--we also heard the same thing earlier this week from Cosby's wife and one of his daughters. It's a desperate move on their part to try to create the illusion he's the victim of a smear campaign by the media, but it's also a foolish move since it only ticks the media off even more to have their integrity questioned for, very obviously, self-serving reasons by those desperate to bail Cosby out of his current situation.
Why would Beverly Johnson's ex-boyfriend, who she lived with from 2006--2009, have anything relevant to say about an incident with Cosby she claims happened in the mid 80's? It was Cosby's lawyer who wanted this man interviewed by CNN because he hoped he could tell CNN something that would help to discredit Beverly Johnson. Why? Because Cosby's lawyer is panicked about Johnson, she's the highest profile of Cosby's accusers, well known in her own right, and she's currently suing Cosby for defamation of character because of things he recently said about her to two different publications. So, they are desperate to try to discredit Beverly, any way they can.
I suspect Johnson's ex-boyfriend really had nothing of interest to tell CNN, despite his trying to sell some kind of story to them at Cosby's lawyer's urging. I suspect, from that article, they saw him as a creep trying to make a few bucks out of his past relationship with Johnson, by using them for that purpose, and told him to get lost. And that's what really infuriated Cosby's lawyer--the fact that CNN was actually applying some journalistic standards, and they weren't allowing that shyster lawyer to try to manipulate them.
The fact that Beverly Johnson never said anything negative about Cosby to this ex-boyfriend doesn't mean a damn thing. If anything that supports her credibility in what she says about him now. She hasn't been trying to hang Cosby for the past 30 years or so, there was no reason she should have discussed what happened with Cosby 20 years earlier with that ex-boyfriend--it wasn't a traumatic incident for her. She came forward now only to support the women who spoke about being drugged by him--she claims only that Cosby tried to drug her, but not that he sexually assaulted her. So, despite Cosby's lawyer's attempts to sell this guy's story to CNN, in hopes it would somehow discredit Johnson, it sounds like the ex-boyfriend really had nothing of interest to tell them.
If Cosby's accusers were all lying about him, that lawyer would be slapping defamation of character suits on them right and left. But he's not doing that, is he? Guess why?
Instead, the lawyer's taking the "smear campaign" strategy and trying to blame the media--maybe next he'll blame a vast right-wing conspiracy.
He's got a client who's sinking fast, into some very deep quicksand, and they are desperate to find a rope they can throw to him. So far, they haven't found one.
In the letter the lawyer allegedly sent to CNN, he does make a veiled threat to sue them at the end of it. I'm sure they are quaking in their boots.
http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/1219-cosby-johnson-zucker-letter-02.pdf
You're just the kind of chump that lawyer hopes he can convince that poor Bill is the victim in all of this--the victim of over 2 dozen lying women and the victim of an outrageous media smear campaign. And you're gullible enough to fall for it because you love these male victim narratives.