@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Being skeptical about people's claims about their profession, and even their rhetoric about their experience(s), is always a good idea.
Yep. And I also reserve skepticism about my own speculations about why they behave in such hyperbolic manners. Could be compensation for a lack of power in their off-lines lives, could be simply a continuation of bullying behavior that they exhibit elsewhere also, could be that more and more psych wards are allowing their inpatients internet access. Lots of possibilities. So, as a result, I try to take their words at more or less face value and suspend judgement about the rest.
The face value of goojohn's behavior with regards to this topic is that I've shown numerous statistical data from relevant experts, including various domestics organizations and the UN. It's a reasonable conclusion, in the face of that overwhelming data, that the US has a problem with police brutality, particularly when it comes to minorities. But that's the strongest claim I've made, ie, that there's a problem that just about everybody who's paying attention recognizes.
And then there's goojohn's responses: name-calling, attempts at intimidation, red herrings, stawman fallacies, etc. For example, when I say "there's a problem," he unwittingly or not hears "all cops are bad," and all of a sudden I have some sort of agenda. At the very least, it's a problem with reading comprehension (remember that people with too-high IQ's are rejected by police departments), coupled with some sort of personality disorder. Taking a step up in severity, he may genuinely have an organic condition that interferes with his ability to model reality from his sensory experiences. Dunno. Ultimately, it's not my problem. He's just another ol' yeller on teh interweebs, ultimately.