@McTag,
McTag wrote:I don't recognise any ideology or cynicism at play here.
Indeed. You are just lying because you enjoy falsely accusing innocent people.
McTag wrote:Just look at the facts.
Your outrageous lies are not facts.
McTag wrote:The only possible defence Zimmerman could use to answer the murder charge was that he was attacked.
Not exactly. Despite your lies, even if this had been an illegal killing, it would only have been manslaughter.
"Pointing out that it is only manslaughter" is a possible defense against a murder charge. Obviously not as ideal as "pointing out that it was not a crime at all", but still a possible defense against a murder charge.
McTag wrote:But he was the one who stalked the man,
Not a crime.
McTag wrote:then engaged with him (against official direction not to do so)
Stop lying, scumbag. He did no such thing.
Not that it would make it murder (or even manslaughter) had Mr. Zimmerman actually questioned Trayvon, but your lies about innocent people should never go unchallenged.
McTag wrote:armed with a lethal weapon, and ready (eager?) to use it.
We remain Free People here in America. We have the Right to Carry Guns whenever we go about in public.
McTag wrote:The marks on his head are not convincing,
You're a freak who likes lynching innocent people.
McTag wrote:and were most probably applied afterwards, as a ploy.
Stop lying, scumbag. You have no possible case that those marks were applied after the fact.
Your lies are unconscionable.
McTag wrote:It was a murder.
McTag rapes little boys.