@McTag,
McTag wrote: In any civilised country,
this would have been a murder trial,
It
was a murder trial.
McTag wrote:with the evidence supporting the prosecution.
There was
NO evidence that defendant did anything improper.
He was ideal, in all respects; a fine citizen, a helpful nabor.
McTag wrote:Only one person had a gun, only one wound up dead.
Apparently, the criminal tried to murder the hero by use of Mixed Martial Arts
and slamming his head on the cement; that was the criminal 's weapon.
McTag wrote:Zimmerman is a coward
HOW was he a "coward" ???
Please explain.
McTag wrote:as well as a racist vigilante gun-nut.
Assuming that Mr. Z was a racist, that was a fine opportunity
for him to express his racism, with a black slamming his head on the cement.
By
WHAT reasoning, Mr. McTag, do u deem him to be "a gun-nut"???
How do u define "a gun-nut"???? ( I agree that his choice of guns
was ill-considered; it was
un-reliable. )
McTag wrote:He should have been dealt with properly by the law.
Very true, Mr. McTag!
I commend u upon your legal insight.
His legal rights were abused in that he shud never have been subjected
to a trial in the face of such
exculpatory circumstances!
That Republican governor was to blame, actually
FIRING
the local prosecutor and sending in a replacement with a mission
to single out and persecute Mr. Z.! Quite disgraceful indeed.
David