To Whom Is George Zimmerman a Hero? And Why?

edgarblythe wrote:

I pray for the day Zimmerman's alligator mouth overloads his tadpole ass in just the right circumstance.

Frank Apisa wrote:

It would be interesting to see him come up against another citizens of his disposition
who decides to "stand his ground" by doing to him what he did to Martin.

It'd be interesting to see a confrontational Zimmerman, refusing to back down to David...
and presenting a clear and present danger to David some day.

I'd kinda like to be watching from a distance, though...
because I know David would not take any crap from him.

And David has heat to bring to the discussion.

I 'd invite him to dinner at a near-by restaurant.
If Travon had adopted that defensive battle tactic,
then he 'd have remained intact. Instead, he chose
to slam Zimmy 's head on the cement.

David

Frank Apisa wrote:

I kinda doubt Martin would have invited him to dinner...
or that Zimmerman would have accepted.

As long as Mr. t. was not slamming Zimmy 's head on the cement,
t. wud remain intact, which wud not be very safe for the rest of us.

Frank Apisa wrote:

It would be interesting to see how things would go if Zimmerman
met up with someone else carrying a gun...and determined not to back down.

Sensible gun-owners r peaceful, if possible, within reason.
It was not reasonable for Zimmy to have remained peaceful,
while t. was slamming his head on the cement.

Frank Apisa wrote:

You would be that person, David.

But I guess to keep this narrative going...you will have to go
the "I'd invite him to dinner route."

Does the fact that it is the truth
count for anything, Frank ?
David

I pray for the day Zimmerman's alligator mouth overloads his tadpole
ass in just the right circumstance.

It would be interesting to see him come up against another citizens of his disposition
who decides to "stand his ground" by doing to him what he did to Martin.

It'd be interesting to see a confrontational Zimmerman, refusing to back down to David...
and presenting a clear and present danger to David some day.

I'd kinda like to be watching from a distance, though...
because I know David would not take any crap from him.

And David has heat to bring to the discussion.

I kinda doubt Martin would have invited him to dinner...
or that Zimmerman would have accepted.

It would be interesting to see how things would go if Zimmerman
met up with someone else carrying a gun...and determined not to back down.

You would be that person, David.

But I guess to keep this narrative going...you will have to go
the "I'd invite him to dinner route."

It certainly is YOUR perception of "the truth", David...
which brings me back to the notion that your narrative is important to you...
and you want to keep it intact...so the "I'd invite him to dinner" route is your best bet.

Reversing places with Martin, however,
and it might not be such an easy job to sell.

Let the guy tracking you persistently be someone black...and big...
and like I said, persistent...and let it be in not especially friendly territory,
like the south Bronx...

...and you might be more likely to pop a cap in the guy
than to invite him to dinner. Especially if he were persistent.

edgarblythe wrote:

I pray for the day Zimmerman's alligator mouth overloads his tadpole
ass in just the right circumstance.

Frank Apisa wrote:

It would be interesting to see him come up against another citizens of his disposition
who decides to "stand his ground" by doing to him what he did to Martin.

It'd be interesting to see a confrontational Zimmerman, refusing to back down to David...
and presenting a clear and present danger to David some day.

I'd kinda like to be watching from a distance, though...
because I know David would not take any crap from him.

And David has heat to bring to the discussion.

I 'd invite him to dinner at a near-by restaurant.
If Travon had adopted that defensive battle tactic,
then he 'd have remained intact. Instead, he chose
to slam Zimmy 's head on the cement.

David

Frank Apisa wrote:

I kinda doubt Martin would have invited him to dinner...
or that Zimmerman would have accepted.

As long as Mr. t. was not slamming Zimmy 's head on the cement,
t. wud remain intact, which wud not be very safe for the rest of us.

Frank Apisa wrote:

It would be interesting to see how things would go if Zimmerman
met up with someone else carrying a gun...and determined not to back down.

Sensible gun-owners r peaceful, if possible, within reason.
It was not reasonable for Zimmy to have remained peaceful,
while t. was slamming his head on the cement.

Frank Apisa wrote:

You would be that person, David.

But I guess to keep this narrative going...you will have to go
the "I'd invite him to dinner route."

Does the fact that it is the truth
count for anything, Frank ?

David

Frank Apisa wrote:

It certainly is YOUR perception of "the truth", David...
which brings me back to the notion that your narrative is important to you...
and you want to keep it intact...so the "I'd invite him to dinner" route is your best bet.

Thanx for your advice on my wagering options.
I have already invited BillRM and his mom to dinner,
as well as several other members of this forum, in NY.
I am not a virgin dinner inviter.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Reversing places with Martin, however,
and it might not be such an easy job to sell.

It certainly is YOUR perception of "the truth", Frank.
I deny that.
It just happened a little while ago:
I was driving away from a restaurant where I had lunch
and a fellow came running up to my white Toyota Prius,
demanding to know who was taking his car.
His own car had been parked next to mine.
I did not get mad. I did not draw on him.
I deemed it humorous.
Admittedly, he was neither "black" nor "big" as u put it.

(If he 'd been more observant, he 'd have seen my color-contrasting
pro-liberty bumper stickers deployed along the flank of my car.)

Frank Apisa wrote:

Let the guy tracking you persistently be someone black...and big...
and like I said, persistent...and let it be in not especially friendly territory,
like the south Bronx...

Wise gun owners practice conflict avoidance.
That means that we dont visit the south Bronx.

Frank Apisa wrote:

...and you might be more likely to pop a cap in the guy
than to invite him to dinner. Especially if he were persistent.

Your characterization of my anticipated behavior is irrational.
I reject it, as being implausible.

I 'd only do that as a counter-attack.
Merely following someone is, by no stretch of the imagination,
an attack; not even in the Twilight Zone.

David

Zimmerman seems to have a knack for getting into bazaar situations.

YES, but I 'm bringing out the fact
that I 'd stand my ground while MAKING FRIENDS with the guy, at the same time.

I 'm 1OO% confident that u r smart enuf to see the distinction in principle between how
I 'd stand my ground and the way that Mr. t stood his, on Zimmy 's gut with the head slamming.
At the end of the evening, we 'd be pals, and both of us intact (see the difference?).

I 'd tell Zimmy about A2K over a flavorful meal and invite him to post here.
It has already happened (b4 today's automotive incident).
Enuf time has passed since last summer that u have probably forgotten
my posts of how I stood my ground while on my mission of nostalgia in Jamaica, Queens.
After attending to business, I drove there in the middle of the nite, about 4 AM,
knowing that having moven to Florida, I 'd probably never see the
earliest stomping grounds of my human memory again.
As I stood on a broad sidewalk, examining the area
thru the eye of my memory, the manager of a bar emerged
from it and locked up. He mildly challenged my presence.
I answered with a friendly smile n a joke; no one got hurt.
That was not Travon's applied philosophy. Do u see the difference, Frank ?

Candor moves me to offer an amendment of my posted intention.
Zimmy is a human being. No one accuses him of being immaculately perfect.
Will u concede that point, Frank?? At least that is not the unanimously held consensus.
Well, in recognition of recent allegations of his involvement with road rage,
I have opted to re-consider my posted intention to begift Zimmy
with my Taurus .44 special revolver in stainless steel mirror,
if ever I met Zimmy, to compensate him for the pistol
whereof he was robbed by obama's attorney-general.

We saw on TV that Zimmy has re-armed himself anyway
and the government has promised to give it back to him
when its alleged investigation is complete.

So, everything considered:
I 'm not gonna give Zimmy my .44 Taurus revolver, if I meet him.

(When I decided to give it to Zimmy, I did not know
that Taurus had taken it out of production.)

David

YES, but I 'm bringing out the fact
that I 'd stand my ground while MAKING FRIENDS with the guy, at the same time.

I 'm 1OO% confident that u r smart enuf to see the distinction in principle between how
I 'd stand my ground and the way that Mr. t stood his, on Zimmy 's gut with the head slamming.
At the end of the evening, we 'd be pals, and both of us intact (see the difference?).

I 'd tell Zimmy about A2K over a flavorful meal and invite him to post here.
It has already happened (b4 today's automotive incident).
Enuf time has passed since last summer that u have probably forgotten
my posts of how I stood my ground while on my mission of nostalgia in Jamaica, Queens.
After attending to business, I drove there in the middle of the nite, about 4 AM,
knowing that having moven to Florida, I 'd probably never see the
earliest stomping grounds of my human memory again.
As I stood on a broad sidewalk, examining the area
thru the eye of my memory, the manager of a bar emerged
from it and locked up. He mildly challenged my presence.
I answered with a friendly smile n a joke; no one got hurt.
That was not Travon's applied philosophy. Do u see the difference, Frank ?

Candor moves me to offer an amendment of my posted intention.
Zimmy is a human being. No one accuses him of being immaculately perfect.
Will u concede that point, Frank?? At least that is not the unanimously held consensus.
Well, in recognition of recent allegations of his involvement with road rage,
I have opted to re-consider my posted intention to begift Zimmy
with my Taurus .44 special revolver in stainless steel mirror,
if ever I met Zimmy, to compensate him for the pistol
whereof he was robbed by obama's attorney-general.

We saw on TV that Zimmy has re-armed himself anyway
and the government has promised to give it back to him
when its alleged investigation is complete.

So, everything considered:
I 'm not gonna give Zimmy my .44 Taurus revolver, if I meet him.

(When I decided to give it to Zimmy, I did not know
that Taurus had taken it out of production.)

David

I still would find an encounter between Zimmerman and someone like you, David.

And if he acted anywhere near the way he did with Martin...
I suspect the encounter would not be close to as peaceful as you are suggesting.

He's a murdering rat bastard. He'll kill again.

What the hell does that even mean?

George Zimmerman will murder again.

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

He's a murdering rat bastard. He'll kill again.

Zimmy did absolutely NOTHING rong
on the night in question; not morally; not legally.
The facts of the case brought that out.

I wish I coud meet him and thank him for his valuable service.
David

too bad this thug is still free.

too bad this thug is still free.

I always find it a bit scary
when I see someone advocate imprisoning innocent people.

bobsal u1553115 wrote:

He's a murdering rat bastard. He'll kill again.

Zimmy did absolutely NOTHING rong
on the night in question; not morally; not legally.
The facts of the case brought that out.

I wish I coud meet him and thank him for his valuable service.
David

I wish you could meet him also, David.
Maybe in a dark alley...and with him in a foul mood.

You would see that justice is served.

George Zimmerman Supporter Changes Mind, ‘Trayvon Targeted For Race’
Source: INQUISITR

Friend and former neighbor Frank Taaffe is testifying against George Zimmerman before a grand jury that will decide if Zimmerman is guilty of violating Trayvon Marton’s civil rights. Despite once defending him on national TV, Taaffe now believes that Zimmerman went after teenage Martin because he was black.

According to the Orlando Sentinel, Frank alleges that a man claiming to be George Zimmerman called him and told him a “racial comment” that was disparaging to Travon Martin before being arrested for the shooting. The former neighbor wouldn’t disclose exactly what the man said outside the courtroom other than it was racist.

He didn’t testify in the earlier court case where Zimmerman was acquitted of second-degree murder charges, believing that the call was just a prank.

Taaffe made the decision to talk about the phone call with FBI due to his own personal tragedies. Recently, both of his sons died, which caused him to reflect on the pain Zimmerman caused the parents of Travon Martin. He explained to reporters, “this is a young man who didn’t deserve to die.”



Read more: http://www.inquisitr.com/1609070/george-zimmerman-supporter-changes-mind-trayvon-targeted-for-race/

Most people view Zimmerman in light of what they believed happened on that night.

George Zimmerman Supporter Changes Mind, ‘Trayvon Targeted For Race’
Source: INQUISITR

Friend and former neighbor Frank Taaffe is testifying against George Zimmerman before a grand jury that will decide if Zimmerman is guilty of violating Trayvon Marton’s civil rights. Despite once defending him on national TV, Taaffe now believes that Zimmerman went after teenage Martin because he was black.