9
   

Want To Be A Patriot? Read And Sign

 
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  4  
Reply Fri 21 Feb, 2014 07:00 pm
@oralloy,
oral go to Hell.
blueveinedthrobber
 
  4  
Reply Fri 21 Feb, 2014 07:00 pm
Bill, join him
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Feb, 2014 07:11 pm
@oralloy,
DELUSIONAL!!!!!!

And the focus - just WOW!!
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Feb, 2014 07:31 pm
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:
oral go to Hell.

I'll never understand why people object so strenuously to me pointing out facts and reality.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Feb, 2014 07:31 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:
DELUSIONAL!!!!!!

Nonsense. My facts are all in order.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 21 Feb, 2014 07:39 pm
@blueveinedthrobber,
Quote:
Bill, join him


No problem as all the interesting and intelligent people are going to end up in hell and all the boring stupid people are going to the Christian idea of heaven most likely.

PS my bet is that heaven will have dial up internet access and hell will have google high speed fiber so we can all pirate the new movies in seconds.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2014 03:13 pm
@oralloy,

Brandon9000 wrote:
Sure, and I promise that I could dream up some grounds to impeach liberal congressmen for policies that I despise, but in America, we tolerate opposing viewpoints and settle things with elections.
oralloy wrote:
Move On got its start by arguing that Democrats should be allowed to commit felonies with impunity.

It's a small step from "Democrats should be allowed to commit felonies with impunity" to "Republicans should be prosecuted even when they've done nothing wrong".
I 'm trying to remember:
didn 't the nazis begin that way in regard to their Stormtroopers, later called: "S.A." ?





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2014 03:18 pm
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:

Quote:
Never in the history of Federal
gov't have so few pieces of legislations have passed.


What does this sort of precedent say to most rational people?
It says ineffective obstructionist legislators to me.
Rag:
at WHAT point is the number of laws TOO MANY?????
According to u, are thay supposed to proceed to infinity???

There shud be a disabling Resolution in Both houses of Congress
that NO NEW LAW shall be passed until thay have repealed 6O%
of those existing.





David
izzythepush
 
  0  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2014 03:32 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Society and technology change. New laws are needed to keep up with the changes if nothing else. If laws had been passed about the interception of emails from abroad you wouldn't have the head of the NSA chuckling over your torrid love missives.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2014 03:59 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Society and technology change. New laws are needed to keep up with the changes if nothing else.
If laws had been passed about the interception of emails from abroad you wouldn't have the head
of the NSA chuckling over your torrid love missives.
Minimally, thay shud be required to repeal a statute
for each new one that thay enact. Thay shud be paid for each statute
that thay repeal and charged money for each that thay enact.





David
JTT
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 23 Mar, 2014 04:07 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
You have to be lying about having been a lawyer, Om. And a mensan - this has to be the low IQ branch.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 12:14:58